Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glenn Ashmore wrote in message news:2me_b.14381$23.140@lakeread04...
I ran into this situation when I was doing research on the marine sanitation legislation. The problem is that the Corps of Engineers does not keep records of yacht traffic on the AICW. Unlike most of the newer impounds and waterways that the COE maintains, the AICW was created before recreational boating had a major economic impact. They must evaluate the economic impact of the AICW on commercial traffic only. It is actually sort of a self fulfilling situation. The COE has to allocate its budget based on economic impact. For several years barge traffic on the AICW was well below the Gulf Coast ICW in total tons and ton-miles. That made the COE allocate more money to other waterways. Tonnage was down 20% from 2000 to 2001 primarily because the low level of maintenance caused so much of shoaling. Now it is 1/20th of the Gulf ICW traffic so it is hard to justify renovating it. Less funding = less traffic = even less funding. If estimated 15,000 recreational boats that transit the waterway twice a year could be included the picture would be a lot different. The thing that really hacks me is that Rep. Jack Kingston from my state who is on the Appropriations Committee did not ask for any funding and all the ICW through Georgia is in his district. All we got was enough to keep 2 engineers at work measuring the shoaling in 100 miles of waterway. DSK wrote: The budget for maintaining the ICW has never been lavish. Now it's just been cut a bit more... One of the big problems I see is that the section between Beaufort NC and Norfolk is going downhill. For much of the Atlantic, going offshore isn't too terrible an option (*if* the inlets are passable)... but Cape Hattaras is a deal breaker. anchorlt wrote: Nothing that a few more tax cuts won´t solve.... john Salty Southeast Nautical Newsletter Supplement (very long cut-n-paste spam snipped) There was an article in Soundings recently about how much the commercial traffic in the ICW contributes to the economy, and they noted that the figures don't include recreational traffic. The question is, does the ICW pay it's own way? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) America — still unprepared, still in danger | General | |||
Danger where you find it | Cruising |