LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
john s.
 
Posts: n/a
Default ICW -- In Danger

Glenn Ashmore wrote in message news:2me_b.14381$23.140@lakeread04...
I ran into this situation when I was doing research on the marine
sanitation legislation. The problem is that the Corps of Engineers does
not keep records of yacht traffic on the AICW. Unlike most of the newer
impounds and waterways that the COE maintains, the AICW was created
before recreational boating had a major economic impact. They must
evaluate the economic impact of the AICW on commercial traffic only.

It is actually sort of a self fulfilling situation. The COE has to
allocate its budget based on economic impact. For several years barge
traffic on the AICW was well below the Gulf Coast ICW in total tons and
ton-miles. That made the COE allocate more money to other waterways.
Tonnage was down 20% from 2000 to 2001 primarily because the low level
of maintenance caused so much of shoaling. Now it is 1/20th of the Gulf
ICW traffic so it is hard to justify renovating it. Less funding = less
traffic = even less funding. If estimated 15,000 recreational boats
that transit the waterway twice a year could be included the picture
would be a lot different.

The thing that really hacks me is that Rep. Jack Kingston from my state
who is on the Appropriations Committee did not ask for any funding and
all the ICW through Georgia is in his district. All we got was enough
to keep 2 engineers at work measuring the shoaling in 100 miles of
waterway.


DSK wrote:

The budget for maintaining the ICW has never been lavish. Now it's just
been cut a bit more...

One of the big problems I see is that the section between Beaufort NC
and Norfolk is going downhill. For much of the Atlantic, going offshore
isn't too terrible an option (*if* the inlets are passable)... but Cape
Hattaras is a deal breaker.

anchorlt wrote:


Nothing that a few more tax cuts won´t solve....
john
Salty Southeast Nautical Newsletter Supplement


(very long cut-n-paste spam snipped)

There was an article in Soundings recently about how much the commercial
traffic in the ICW contributes to the economy, and they noted that the
figures don't include recreational traffic. The question is, does the
ICW pay it's own way?

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
( OT ) America — still unprepared, still in danger Jim General 0 April 2nd 04 04:25 PM
Danger where you find it Chuck Bollinger Cruising 0 December 5th 03 04:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017