![]() |
|
Inboard vs Outboard
If this has been beat to death before, my apology.
I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in
rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? Not necessarily. There's snob appeal and esthetics at work as much as considerations of efficiency. The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. A 15- to 20 HP fourstroke OB iss as powerful as you'd need. Most 30 HP direct drive IBs put out 17-18 HP at the prop. Speaking of the prop, you'd want a special one for an OB on a sailboat with a maximum hull speed of 7 knots (30-32 feet). You want something with bite, not speed. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. Well, if you are sailing most of the time, there's no real issue then. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Things to consider: Where does the gas go? Is the OB permanently hosed and wired to a control lever near the helm? Does your transom "suit" an OB? Canoe sterns generally don't, for instance. The looks of the thing...do you care? A 15 HP 4-stroke OB is well over 100 lbs.: can you lift it off for storage? I'll bet a thief and his buddy can. Advantages: ease of access, reliability, transportability, easy to get gas, can be lifted clear of the water while sailing, reducing drag. Can conceivably be used fixed or pivoting, making docking a lot easier. Rapid response. Can be transferred to a (largish) tender, like a 10 foot RIB, which is perfect for a 15 HP. Easy to unfoul the prop. Easy to maintain and get semi-cheap spares. Possible to hand-start. Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, gearing and prop usually not ideal for sailboat speeds, although this can probably be remedied, not ideal for prolonged use like Atomic 4s or diesels, not great with charging batteries, running lights, etc. May interfere or preclude windvane steering. I put these points forward for debate, not as uncontestable. Personally, I think an OB can work on a 30 foot or more boat, but I usually see them on nothing bigger than a 27 foot C&C that's stripped for racing. Must be a reason for that.... However, when my Atomic 4 overheated on a cruise in 2000, I was able to lash my 10' Zodiac to the side of my five ton cruiser and use the 10 HP 1985 Honda 4-stroke to drive the boat at 4 knots for several NM until we got to our home port. So, yes, it can be done. Burnt a lot more gas than usual, however G. R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in
rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? Not necessarily. There's snob appeal and esthetics at work as much as considerations of efficiency. The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. A 15- to 20 HP fourstroke OB iss as powerful as you'd need. Most 30 HP direct drive IBs put out 17-18 HP at the prop. Speaking of the prop, you'd want a special one for an OB on a sailboat with a maximum hull speed of 7 knots (30-32 feet). You want something with bite, not speed. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. Well, if you are sailing most of the time, there's no real issue then. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Things to consider: Where does the gas go? Is the OB permanently hosed and wired to a control lever near the helm? Does your transom "suit" an OB? Canoe sterns generally don't, for instance. The looks of the thing...do you care? A 15 HP 4-stroke OB is well over 100 lbs.: can you lift it off for storage? I'll bet a thief and his buddy can. Advantages: ease of access, reliability, transportability, easy to get gas, can be lifted clear of the water while sailing, reducing drag. Can conceivably be used fixed or pivoting, making docking a lot easier. Rapid response. Can be transferred to a (largish) tender, like a 10 foot RIB, which is perfect for a 15 HP. Easy to unfoul the prop. Easy to maintain and get semi-cheap spares. Possible to hand-start. Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, gearing and prop usually not ideal for sailboat speeds, although this can probably be remedied, not ideal for prolonged use like Atomic 4s or diesels, not great with charging batteries, running lights, etc. May interfere or preclude windvane steering. I put these points forward for debate, not as uncontestable. Personally, I think an OB can work on a 30 foot or more boat, but I usually see them on nothing bigger than a 27 foot C&C that's stripped for racing. Must be a reason for that.... However, when my Atomic 4 overheated on a cruise in 2000, I was able to lash my 10' Zodiac to the side of my five ton cruiser and use the 10 HP 1985 Honda 4-stroke to drive the boat at 4 knots for several NM until we got to our home port. So, yes, it can be done. Burnt a lot more gas than usual, however G. R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured
to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:21:56 -0500, rhys wrote: OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? Not necessarily. There's snob appeal and esthetics at work as much as considerations of efficiency. The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. A 15- to 20 HP fourstroke OB iss as powerful as you'd need. Most 30 HP direct drive IBs put out 17-18 HP at the prop. Speaking of the prop, you'd want a special one for an OB on a sailboat with a maximum hull speed of 7 knots (30-32 feet). You want something with bite, not speed. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. Well, if you are sailing most of the time, there's no real issue then. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Things to consider: Where does the gas go? Is the OB permanently hosed and wired to a control lever near the helm? Does your transom "suit" an OB? Canoe sterns generally don't, for instance. The looks of the thing...do you care? A 15 HP 4-stroke OB is well over 100 lbs.: can you lift it off for storage? I'll bet a thief and his buddy can. Advantages: ease of access, reliability, transportability, easy to get gas, can be lifted clear of the water while sailing, reducing drag. Can conceivably be used fixed or pivoting, making docking a lot easier. Rapid response. Can be transferred to a (largish) tender, like a 10 foot RIB, which is perfect for a 15 HP. Easy to unfoul the prop. Easy to maintain and get semi-cheap spares. Possible to hand-start. Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, gearing and prop usually not ideal for sailboat speeds, although this can probably be remedied, not ideal for prolonged use like Atomic 4s or diesels, not great with charging batteries, running lights, etc. May interfere or preclude windvane steering. I put these points forward for debate, not as uncontestable. Personally, I think an OB can work on a 30 foot or more boat, but I usually see them on nothing bigger than a 27 foot C&C that's stripped for racing. Must be a reason for that.... However, when my Atomic 4 overheated on a cruise in 2000, I was able to lash my 10' Zodiac to the side of my five ton cruiser and use the 10 HP 1985 Honda 4-stroke to drive the boat at 4 knots for several NM until we got to our home port. So, yes, it can be done. Burnt a lot more gas than usual, however G. R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured
to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:21:56 -0500, rhys wrote: OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? Not necessarily. There's snob appeal and esthetics at work as much as considerations of efficiency. The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. A 15- to 20 HP fourstroke OB iss as powerful as you'd need. Most 30 HP direct drive IBs put out 17-18 HP at the prop. Speaking of the prop, you'd want a special one for an OB on a sailboat with a maximum hull speed of 7 knots (30-32 feet). You want something with bite, not speed. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. Well, if you are sailing most of the time, there's no real issue then. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Things to consider: Where does the gas go? Is the OB permanently hosed and wired to a control lever near the helm? Does your transom "suit" an OB? Canoe sterns generally don't, for instance. The looks of the thing...do you care? A 15 HP 4-stroke OB is well over 100 lbs.: can you lift it off for storage? I'll bet a thief and his buddy can. Advantages: ease of access, reliability, transportability, easy to get gas, can be lifted clear of the water while sailing, reducing drag. Can conceivably be used fixed or pivoting, making docking a lot easier. Rapid response. Can be transferred to a (largish) tender, like a 10 foot RIB, which is perfect for a 15 HP. Easy to unfoul the prop. Easy to maintain and get semi-cheap spares. Possible to hand-start. Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, gearing and prop usually not ideal for sailboat speeds, although this can probably be remedied, not ideal for prolonged use like Atomic 4s or diesels, not great with charging batteries, running lights, etc. May interfere or preclude windvane steering. I put these points forward for debate, not as uncontestable. Personally, I think an OB can work on a 30 foot or more boat, but I usually see them on nothing bigger than a 27 foot C&C that's stripped for racing. Must be a reason for that.... However, when my Atomic 4 overheated on a cruise in 2000, I was able to lash my 10' Zodiac to the side of my five ton cruiser and use the 10 HP 1985 Honda 4-stroke to drive the boat at 4 knots for several NM until we got to our home port. So, yes, it can be done. Burnt a lot more gas than usual, however G. R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:20:52 -0800, engsol
wrote: Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm My pleasure. I can't answer my own question as to why boats over 27' rarely, if ever, feature an outboard, but as I've lost significant sailing time in the last few years due to mishaps with my inboard engine, it certainly has occurred to me. In my case, with a pinched reverse transom IOR-style stern, an outboard and its pivoting mount would adversely affect its looks, and I like the boat's looks... Oh, here's another downside: a lot of weight in the stern can affect the balance of the boat and lead to unnecessary or undesirable "hobbyhorsing" in certain sea conditions. To a degree, this is offset by a high ballast ratio which on some older racer-cruisers is 40-50%, but other models would "feel" 100-120 lbs. off the stern more than others, just as they would "feel" 200 feet of chain and a 66 lb. Bruce anchor at the bow. That's why you'd want to strike a balance between OB power and getting it off the stern: the trim settings of an OB can mitigate somewhat its weight, but when it's off and stowed out of the water, it's like having a woman hanging off the stern rail. Which may appeal...I dunno...G R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:20:52 -0800, engsol
wrote: Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm My pleasure. I can't answer my own question as to why boats over 27' rarely, if ever, feature an outboard, but as I've lost significant sailing time in the last few years due to mishaps with my inboard engine, it certainly has occurred to me. In my case, with a pinched reverse transom IOR-style stern, an outboard and its pivoting mount would adversely affect its looks, and I like the boat's looks... Oh, here's another downside: a lot of weight in the stern can affect the balance of the boat and lead to unnecessary or undesirable "hobbyhorsing" in certain sea conditions. To a degree, this is offset by a high ballast ratio which on some older racer-cruisers is 40-50%, but other models would "feel" 100-120 lbs. off the stern more than others, just as they would "feel" 200 feet of chain and a 66 lb. Bruce anchor at the bow. That's why you'd want to strike a balance between OB power and getting it off the stern: the trim settings of an OB can mitigate somewhat its weight, but when it's off and stowed out of the water, it's like having a woman hanging off the stern rail. Which may appeal...I dunno...G R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
Well ... I'm definitely no expert but just had to join in :-). I'd go
outboard in this situation with logic as follows ... safe haven close by, you can pick up a used outboard for next to nothing and if it was me, that's what I would do and consider it a throwaway if something goes really wrong. And if a repair is required, just drop it off and go sailing ... maybe even beg a loaner off the shop. All they're used for around here is to get out of the boat basin ... and that doesn't take much hp given a sailboats hull design and efficiency once it gets moving. Geez ... those things move forward with a gentle breeze applied to the hull :-) "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Well ... I'm definitely no expert but just had to join in :-). I'd go
outboard in this situation with logic as follows ... safe haven close by, you can pick up a used outboard for next to nothing and if it was me, that's what I would do and consider it a throwaway if something goes really wrong. And if a repair is required, just drop it off and go sailing ... maybe even beg a loaner off the shop. All they're used for around here is to get out of the boat basin ... and that doesn't take much hp given a sailboats hull design and efficiency once it gets moving. Geez ... those things move forward with a gentle breeze applied to the hull :-) "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Norm,
Let me start by saying that my current boat is a 4600# 26ft Lod center board sloop. It has a 10Hp long shaft electric start on a movable mount. I know nothing about your home water. I never thought I would have and outboard for an auxiliary, but I do now. The only time it gets bad is when you have to power in an inlet that has rollers coming out. Other than that I'm usually sailing because I can't power the much over 6.0 but if it is blowing at all I can make 6.4-5. Bad things: The engine is where you don't want weight. The prop is too close to the surface and all that stuff. It can be stolen, but a McGard bolt will make that really tough. Good things: New outboards are stone reliable (at least as good as an A4 - ever) (and they can most all be started when your battery is down) If (when)it needs attention you don't have to try to fit in the little hole it is crammed into. You can even take it ashore and either fix it yourself or tell someone "here - fix it, make it all better and give it back" You even can barrow an engine if needed. The shaft packing never drips. Matt Colie A.Sloop "Bonne Ide'e" S2-7.9 #1 Lifelong Waterman, Licensed Mariner and Pathological Sailor engsol wrote: If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Norm,
Let me start by saying that my current boat is a 4600# 26ft Lod center board sloop. It has a 10Hp long shaft electric start on a movable mount. I know nothing about your home water. I never thought I would have and outboard for an auxiliary, but I do now. The only time it gets bad is when you have to power in an inlet that has rollers coming out. Other than that I'm usually sailing because I can't power the much over 6.0 but if it is blowing at all I can make 6.4-5. Bad things: The engine is where you don't want weight. The prop is too close to the surface and all that stuff. It can be stolen, but a McGard bolt will make that really tough. Good things: New outboards are stone reliable (at least as good as an A4 - ever) (and they can most all be started when your battery is down) If (when)it needs attention you don't have to try to fit in the little hole it is crammed into. You can even take it ashore and either fix it yourself or tell someone "here - fix it, make it all better and give it back" You even can barrow an engine if needed. The shaft packing never drips. Matt Colie A.Sloop "Bonne Ide'e" S2-7.9 #1 Lifelong Waterman, Licensed Mariner and Pathological Sailor engsol wrote: If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:44:42 GMT, "bowgus" wrote:
Well ... I'm definitely no expert but just had to join in :-). I'd go outboard in this situation with logic as follows ... safe haven close by, you can pick up a used outboard for next to nothing and if it was me, that's what I would do and consider it a throwaway if something goes really wrong. And if a repair is required, just drop it off and go sailing ... maybe even beg a loaner off the shop. All they're used for around here is to get out of the boat basin ... and that doesn't take much hp given a sailboats hull design and efficiency once it gets moving. Geez ... those things move forward with a gentle breeze applied to the hull :-) Well, of course you are right, and until post WWII a lot of smaller (under 50') boats had no auxiliaries at all, as they were considered dangerous (paraffin, gas) or balky and too heavy (diesel). You only need a motor on a sailboat for passagemaking, getting in and out of confined spots like some wind-locked basins, and to charge batteries. If you needed to "power" into a basin in heavy weather, for instance, you might use close to 100% of your available thrust, but our grandparents used to run or claw offshore or drop anchor. These days, many of us have to "be somewhere", and the engine helps that happen. Maybe the problem is not in our boats, but in ourselves.... R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:44:42 GMT, "bowgus" wrote:
Well ... I'm definitely no expert but just had to join in :-). I'd go outboard in this situation with logic as follows ... safe haven close by, you can pick up a used outboard for next to nothing and if it was me, that's what I would do and consider it a throwaway if something goes really wrong. And if a repair is required, just drop it off and go sailing ... maybe even beg a loaner off the shop. All they're used for around here is to get out of the boat basin ... and that doesn't take much hp given a sailboats hull design and efficiency once it gets moving. Geez ... those things move forward with a gentle breeze applied to the hull :-) Well, of course you are right, and until post WWII a lot of smaller (under 50') boats had no auxiliaries at all, as they were considered dangerous (paraffin, gas) or balky and too heavy (diesel). You only need a motor on a sailboat for passagemaking, getting in and out of confined spots like some wind-locked basins, and to charge batteries. If you needed to "power" into a basin in heavy weather, for instance, you might use close to 100% of your available thrust, but our grandparents used to run or claw offshore or drop anchor. These days, many of us have to "be somewhere", and the engine helps that happen. Maybe the problem is not in our boats, but in ourselves.... R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
Are you a sailing sailboater or a motoring sailboater?
Could make the difference. G "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Are you a sailing sailboater or a motoring sailboater?
Could make the difference. G "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Comments interspersed throughout:
"rhys" wrote in message ... OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? snipped some good bits that were here Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. more god bits snipped Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, I've been out in a 35 footer (40% ballast ratio) in a lake on days when occasionally water came over the stern from pitching while motoring into a strong wind. I have a feeling that would be the end of the OB, especially with the increased hobbyhorsing you'd get with all that extra weight so far aft alternately lifting the prop out of the water and then driving it back in. more good bits snipped here "rhys" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:20:52 -0800, engsol wrote: Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm My pleasure. I can't answer my own question as to why boats over 27' rarely, if ever, feature an outboard, but as I've lost significant sailing time in the last few years due to mishaps with my inboard engine, it certainly has occurred to me. In my case, with a pinched reverse transom IOR-style stern, an outboard and its pivoting mount would adversely affect its looks, and I like the boat's looks... Oh, here's another downside: a lot of weight in the stern can affect the balance of the boat and lead to unnecessary or undesirable "hobbyhorsing" in certain sea conditions. To a degree, this is offset by a high ballast ratio which on some older racer-cruisers is 40-50%, but other models would "feel" 100-120 lbs. off the stern more than others, just as they would "feel" 200 feet of chain and a 66 lb. Bruce anchor at the bow. That's why you'd want to strike a balance between OB power and getting it off the stern: the trim settings of an OB can mitigate somewhat its weight, but when it's off and stowed out of the water, it's like having a woman hanging off the stern rail. Which may appeal...I dunno...G R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
Comments interspersed throughout:
"rhys" wrote in message ... OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? snipped some good bits that were here Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. more god bits snipped Disadvantages: Easy to steal, easy to swamp in a seaway, I've been out in a 35 footer (40% ballast ratio) in a lake on days when occasionally water came over the stern from pitching while motoring into a strong wind. I have a feeling that would be the end of the OB, especially with the increased hobbyhorsing you'd get with all that extra weight so far aft alternately lifting the prop out of the water and then driving it back in. more good bits snipped here "rhys" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:20:52 -0800, engsol wrote: Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm My pleasure. I can't answer my own question as to why boats over 27' rarely, if ever, feature an outboard, but as I've lost significant sailing time in the last few years due to mishaps with my inboard engine, it certainly has occurred to me. In my case, with a pinched reverse transom IOR-style stern, an outboard and its pivoting mount would adversely affect its looks, and I like the boat's looks... Oh, here's another downside: a lot of weight in the stern can affect the balance of the boat and lead to unnecessary or undesirable "hobbyhorsing" in certain sea conditions. To a degree, this is offset by a high ballast ratio which on some older racer-cruisers is 40-50%, but other models would "feel" 100-120 lbs. off the stern more than others, just as they would "feel" 200 feet of chain and a 66 lb. Bruce anchor at the bow. That's why you'd want to strike a balance between OB power and getting it off the stern: the trim settings of an OB can mitigate somewhat its weight, but when it's off and stowed out of the water, it's like having a woman hanging off the stern rail. Which may appeal...I dunno...G R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
I had a 7.5 HP and a 3.5 HP outboard(s) on my old 24ft sloop in Puget
Sound and I never had a problem. If it needed work I'd just pull it off and take it to the shop. Sometimes I would motor for hour's. I liked it. I got good at docking and having one hand on the engine throttle and the other on the tiller. After I had motored out of the marina I would turn off the engine and while laying on my stomach off the transom and pull the motor bracket to the up position so that the long shaft lower unit was out of the water for less drag. But this could be a difficult reach on a 30' boat with more freeboard as a bigger boat may be higher off the water. Depend's on the boat. engsol wrote in message . .. If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
I had a 7.5 HP and a 3.5 HP outboard(s) on my old 24ft sloop in Puget
Sound and I never had a problem. If it needed work I'd just pull it off and take it to the shop. Sometimes I would motor for hour's. I liked it. I got good at docking and having one hand on the engine throttle and the other on the tiller. After I had motored out of the marina I would turn off the engine and while laying on my stomach off the transom and pull the motor bracket to the up position so that the long shaft lower unit was out of the water for less drag. But this could be a difficult reach on a 30' boat with more freeboard as a bigger boat may be higher off the water. Depend's on the boat. engsol wrote in message . .. If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
OB prop more likely to leave water if pitching in large waves.
==== Charles T. Low - remove "UN" www.boatdocking.com/BDPhoto.html - Photo Contest www.boatdocking.com www.ctlow.ca/Trojan26 - my boat ==== "engsol" wrote in message ... Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
OB prop more likely to leave water if pitching in large waves.
==== Charles T. Low - remove "UN" www.boatdocking.com/BDPhoto.html - Photo Contest www.boatdocking.com www.ctlow.ca/Trojan26 - my boat ==== "engsol" wrote in message ... Thanks....you've given me a number of considerations that hadn't occured to me....fuel storage...theft...etc. On the other hand, some things aren't a factor, such as a windvane. Thanks again. Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
An OB will give you a little weight, up atop the transom.
An IB would provide a greater mass, and place it well down in the hull. It would seem to me that the lower COG would be a benefit, but I guess that would depend whether the actual mounting is below the current effective COG. I'd think most NA's would consider the weight and mass of an inboard when designing a boat, so in some cases it might be foolish to actually remove an existing inboard when making a swtich to OB power. Diesel is an option with an inboard, not really so with an outboard. Just the diesel vs. gas equation should make the inboard more reliable than the outboard. |
Inboard vs Outboard
An OB will give you a little weight, up atop the transom.
An IB would provide a greater mass, and place it well down in the hull. It would seem to me that the lower COG would be a benefit, but I guess that would depend whether the actual mounting is below the current effective COG. I'd think most NA's would consider the weight and mass of an inboard when designing a boat, so in some cases it might be foolish to actually remove an existing inboard when making a swtich to OB power. Diesel is an option with an inboard, not really so with an outboard. Just the diesel vs. gas equation should make the inboard more reliable than the outboard. |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:33:33 -0400, "Ken Heaton"
wrote: Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. I agree...I was referring more to the access while at dock...you can lash a pram under the transom and with a bucket and small tool kit, do 90% of your maintenance in the nice fresh air and sunshine, instead of in a dimly lit cave. more god bits snipped Man, and I thought crucifixion was nasty...god bits, indeed! R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:33:33 -0400, "Ken Heaton"
wrote: Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. I agree...I was referring more to the access while at dock...you can lash a pram under the transom and with a bucket and small tool kit, do 90% of your maintenance in the nice fresh air and sunshine, instead of in a dimly lit cave. more god bits snipped Man, and I thought crucifixion was nasty...god bits, indeed! R. |
Inboard vs Outboard
I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD
I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD
I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message ... If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
M,
Thanks for the advice. It's right in line with other good responses to my query. A light-weight OB might be OK as a backup, but I have to admit I like the safety of diesel. As to the boat condition, I'm willing to trade my sweat for a lower price. As odd as it may sound, (I can hear the old-timers groaning), I'm looking forward to working on my boat and learning how to repair and maintain her. Have any leads or pointers? Norm On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:34:41 -0800, "Michael" wrote: I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message .. . If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
M,
Thanks for the advice. It's right in line with other good responses to my query. A light-weight OB might be OK as a backup, but I have to admit I like the safety of diesel. As to the boat condition, I'm willing to trade my sweat for a lower price. As odd as it may sound, (I can hear the old-timers groaning), I'm looking forward to working on my boat and learning how to repair and maintain her. Have any leads or pointers? Norm On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:34:41 -0800, "Michael" wrote: I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message .. . If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Norm, I know of a boat that you may like at Everett Marina. An older
man own's it and is unable to take it out anymore. He show's up every summer on weekends to hang-out on it. Told me once he'd probably almost give it to the right person. Email me for directions. (it has an inboard) engsol wrote in message . .. If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
Norm, I know of a boat that you may like at Everett Marina. An older
man own's it and is unable to take it out anymore. He show's up every summer on weekends to hang-out on it. Told me once he'd probably almost give it to the right person. Email me for directions. (it has an inboard) engsol wrote in message . .. If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
In article ,
engsol wrote: If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Our boat came as inboard or outboard and I'm in regular contact with a sister who has the outboard. For "short" distances, particularly if you're not in a hurry, the outboard is just fine. If you might like to go far and "fast", inboard is the way to go. I'm somewhat arbitrarily thinking 25 nm and 5-5.5 knots as short, and up to 70-80 nm at 6 knots (on our hull speed of 6.6) as fast. "not in a hurry" includes: "If it ain't fun, it ain't fun and I'm parking it until it GETS fun!" (AKA cruising) An outboard will require alternate charging unless you're VERY frugal. In a heavy slog, the prop will come out of the water more often than anyone likes. A larger than needed outboard not only gives you the punch to go fast if you have to, but will last longer. For our purposes, I'd want an diesel inboard. But I lust after the cavernous stowage our sister has under the cockpit. I think you could park a small car in there. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Inboard vs Outboard
In article ,
engsol wrote: If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Our boat came as inboard or outboard and I'm in regular contact with a sister who has the outboard. For "short" distances, particularly if you're not in a hurry, the outboard is just fine. If you might like to go far and "fast", inboard is the way to go. I'm somewhat arbitrarily thinking 25 nm and 5-5.5 knots as short, and up to 70-80 nm at 6 knots (on our hull speed of 6.6) as fast. "not in a hurry" includes: "If it ain't fun, it ain't fun and I'm parking it until it GETS fun!" (AKA cruising) An outboard will require alternate charging unless you're VERY frugal. In a heavy slog, the prop will come out of the water more often than anyone likes. A larger than needed outboard not only gives you the punch to go fast if you have to, but will last longer. For our purposes, I'd want an diesel inboard. But I lust after the cavernous stowage our sister has under the cockpit. I think you could park a small car in there. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Inboard vs Outboard
If you don't find anything by end of June send me an email. I'm heading out
to work on a freighter until then. I have a 26' Westerly Centaur which is what I'll term an advanced project boat. I used her for three years and now she's on the dry and does need some work. In my case I could have her back sailing in three weeks. Except I bought the next size larger a Westerly Berwick. The Centaur will be available in July when I get back with or without the T9.9 Yamaha. Can you wire a 12 volt system? Can you finish off a cabin interior. That's the bulk of it. M. "engsol" wrote in message ... M, Thanks for the advice. It's right in line with other good responses to my query. A light-weight OB might be OK as a backup, but I have to admit I like the safety of diesel. As to the boat condition, I'm willing to trade my sweat for a lower price. As odd as it may sound, (I can hear the old-timers groaning), I'm looking forward to working on my boat and learning how to repair and maintain her. Have any leads or pointers? Norm On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:34:41 -0800, "Michael" wrote: I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message .. . If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
If you don't find anything by end of June send me an email. I'm heading out
to work on a freighter until then. I have a 26' Westerly Centaur which is what I'll term an advanced project boat. I used her for three years and now she's on the dry and does need some work. In my case I could have her back sailing in three weeks. Except I bought the next size larger a Westerly Berwick. The Centaur will be available in July when I get back with or without the T9.9 Yamaha. Can you wire a 12 volt system? Can you finish off a cabin interior. That's the bulk of it. M. "engsol" wrote in message ... M, Thanks for the advice. It's right in line with other good responses to my query. A light-weight OB might be OK as a backup, but I have to admit I like the safety of diesel. As to the boat condition, I'm willing to trade my sweat for a lower price. As odd as it may sound, (I can hear the old-timers groaning), I'm looking forward to working on my boat and learning how to repair and maintain her. Have any leads or pointers? Norm On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:34:41 -0800, "Michael" wrote: I use a Yamaha T9.9 four stroke on my 26' sloop. On the second boat 31' LOD I use an inboard diesel. Both out of PortTownsend. For the San Juans you definitely need an engine but both will work. Inboard takes up inside space diesel is safer. Outboard gives you more internal room but gas is more dangerous. Diesels last at least 10 times as long as outboards in terms of engine hours. If you go inboard use diesel not gas. If you go outboard use four stroke with a reduction gear and a long shaft not a two stroke. Both work fine. M. PS You want a ready to go boat or one that needs a bit of work? "engsol" wrote in message .. . If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Thanks, Norm |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:20:46 +0000, engsol wrote:
If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Well, most of my points have already been covered, but I'll add them anyway... The only advantage I can think of with an outboard is cost: I just dropped $10K CDN on a 26hp inboard diesel, and you can buy a 25hp 4-stroke outboard for about 1/3 of that. Then again, my old engine was 20 years old and had about 4000 hrs on it... Disadvantages? - Prop leaves the water when in waves. This includes wakes from larger boats such as ferries or tugs, and is worse the larger the boat is (one reason you don't see many OBs on larger boats) - Access for repairs, etc. when at sea is hazardous at best. - Doesn't charge batteries well (My new engine has 71 Amp alternator) - Is raw-water cooled, so even if you flush it after each use, it's not good for more than 5 years or so in salt water. - You can't heat domestic water with it - not available in diesel I don't think the swamping issue is significant in San Juans, although you might get a rogue wave or wake that would temporarily swamp it. So unless you're using the boat as a glorified day-sailor (A friend use to call them "sammich-anna-sixpack sailors"), I'd say the inboard is a better bet. Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 |
Inboard vs Outboard
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:20:46 +0000, engsol wrote:
If this has been beat to death before, my apology. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? The advantage of an OB is cost, doesn't take up interior room, at least semi-reliable these days. But then I wonder about enough power in a seaway. The area I plan to sail (San Juan Islands) is quite sheltered.... wind chop, but seldom any significant swells. A safe haven is rarely more than 4 - 5 hours away. So what am I missing, or haven't thought of, as regards to OB power? Well, most of my points have already been covered, but I'll add them anyway... The only advantage I can think of with an outboard is cost: I just dropped $10K CDN on a 26hp inboard diesel, and you can buy a 25hp 4-stroke outboard for about 1/3 of that. Then again, my old engine was 20 years old and had about 4000 hrs on it... Disadvantages? - Prop leaves the water when in waves. This includes wakes from larger boats such as ferries or tugs, and is worse the larger the boat is (one reason you don't see many OBs on larger boats) - Access for repairs, etc. when at sea is hazardous at best. - Doesn't charge batteries well (My new engine has 71 Amp alternator) - Is raw-water cooled, so even if you flush it after each use, it's not good for more than 5 years or so in salt water. - You can't heat domestic water with it - not available in diesel I don't think the swamping issue is significant in San Juans, although you might get a rogue wave or wake that would temporarily swamp it. So unless you're using the boat as a glorified day-sailor (A friend use to call them "sammich-anna-sixpack sailors"), I'd say the inboard is a better bet. Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 |
Inboard vs Outboard
Comments below:
wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:33:33 -0400, "Ken Heaton" wrote: Comments interspersed throughout: "rhys" wrote in message .. . OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? snipped some good bits that were here Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. If you are on a sailboat, and it's "blowing", why on earth do you need the motor? BB Many boaters need their motor for the last bit of their sail to re-enter a marina, etc. Some things are tricky to do with sails alone, especially if its blowing and you are short handed. If you are having motor problems you are going to try to get it running while sailing with some sea room, no? -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
Inboard vs Outboard
Comments below:
wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:33:33 -0400, "Ken Heaton" wrote: Comments interspersed throughout: "rhys" wrote in message .. . OK, I've got an old 33 footer powered by an Atomic 4...currently in rebuild mode. Trust me...I've thought of this. I'm looking for a boat to enjoy upon retirement this May. Being poor, I'll have to settle for an older boat, 30-32 feet. I've seen a number of boats in my price range on my list, but have rejected the ones with an OB. But then I got to wondering...should I do so? snipped some good bits that were here Advantages: ease of access, Debateable actually, if you're out sailing and the weather is deteriorating, say it's starting to rain and blow and you are having engine troubles, try working on that 100 lb outboard while its hanging over the stern in the wind and the rain. See what I mean? Not too hard to loose some small part or tool overboard. With an inboard you're down below, probably uncomfortable and dropping things, but they are still in the boat and you aren't opening the engine to rain and spray. If you are on a sailboat, and it's "blowing", why on earth do you need the motor? BB Many boaters need their motor for the last bit of their sail to re-enter a marina, etc. Some things are tricky to do with sails alone, especially if its blowing and you are short handed. If you are having motor problems you are going to try to get it running while sailing with some sea room, no? -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
Inboard vs Outboard
Many boaters need their motor for the last bit of their sail to re-enter a
marina, etc. Some things are tricky to do with sails alone, especially if its blowing and you are short handed. turn around and go back offshore. If you are having engine problems (unlikely for most modern outboard engines, but rather more likely with a crudded up diesel fuel tank) and you manage to get the engine running is STILL far more likely to have continuing engine problems. If you are entering a marina in a blow and you are worried about your engine you used bad judgement. If you used bad judgement, an outboard is more reliable than your inboard with a precise fuel system with known junk in the fuel tank. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com