|
Radar on a cell phone
|
Radar on a cell phone
schlackoff, re-read what you wrote and be embarrassed for yourself, for you are
unequivically stating that a.) the operator of the water taxi was unable to see the weather developing, and b.) a cell phone would have. dumb. schlackoff? Are you saying the CG should require that ALL water taxis carry -- and monitor -- a radar enabled cell phone? Um, no. I'm saying that, as many have argued in the thread and as has now been proven, your statement (quoted here again:) jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more. This ain't rocket science, except to those floating on training wheels (who be definition are scared squatless of the water). is total BS. Do suppose it might be more effective to require water taxi drivers to be able to understand weather? Hey! Wait a minute! Water taxi drivers are required to be able to understand weather. Understanding the weather wouldn't have mattered a whit in this case, which is the point. There was a total of 10 minutes of warning for the cell that hit the taxi. 10 minutes is nowhere near your claim of seeing potential storms developing for hours or more. I.e, what happened is exactly what you said can't happen. Your claim that "we can see one developing for a couple hours or more" is now unequivocally proven to be total BS, just as we all suspected. Steve |
Radar on a cell phone
schlackoff, re-read what you wrote and be embarrassed for yourself, for you are
unequivically stating that a.) the operator of the water taxi was unable to see the weather developing, and b.) a cell phone would have. dumb. schlackoff? Are you saying the CG should require that ALL water taxis carry -- and monitor -- a radar enabled cell phone? Um, no. I'm saying that, as many have argued in the thread and as has now been proven, your statement (quoted here again:) jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more. This ain't rocket science, except to those floating on training wheels (who be definition are scared squatless of the water). is total BS. Do suppose it might be more effective to require water taxi drivers to be able to understand weather? Hey! Wait a minute! Water taxi drivers are required to be able to understand weather. Understanding the weather wouldn't have mattered a whit in this case, which is the point. There was a total of 10 minutes of warning for the cell that hit the taxi. 10 minutes is nowhere near your claim of seeing potential storms developing for hours or more. I.e, what happened is exactly what you said can't happen. Your claim that "we can see one developing for a couple hours or more" is now unequivocally proven to be total BS, just as we all suspected. Steve |
Radar on a cell phone
|
Radar on a cell phone
|
Radar on a cell phone
schlackoff, you bring nothing of any value to any discussion. Not sure whether
you are too dumb not to sit in dog****, or you just like to. btw, do you suppose the water taxi driver was told about the winds coming. that's the news report, which may be wrong. but schlackoff just wants to say the driver was totally unable to see what was coming, thus excusing schlackoff from seeing what's coming. maybe schlackoff isn't dumb? maybe he is lazy? schlackoff, re-read what you wrote and be embarrassed for yourself, for you are unequivically stating that a.) the operator of the water taxi was unable to see the weather developing, and b.) a cell phone would have. Seems like you can't even understand simple english. Nowhere did I say anything about a cell phone. I'll say it again, your statement: "jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more." has been proven to be wrong. Again, there's no mention of a cellphone in your statement and I didn't say anything about a cellphone either. The only thing I'm saying is that your statement above is wrong. That's it, nothing more. Can you comprehend that? Steve schlackoff? Are you saying the CG should require that ALL water taxis carry -- and monitor -- a radar enabled cell phone? Um, no. I'm saying that, as many have argued in the thread and as has now been proven, your statement (quoted here again:) jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more. This ain't rocket science, except to those floating on training wheels (who be definition are scared squatless of the water). is total BS. Do suppose it might be more effective to require water taxi drivers to be able to understand weather? Hey! Wait a minute! Water taxi drivers are required to be able to understand weather. Understanding the weather wouldn't have mattered a whit in this case, which is the point. There was a total of 10 minutes of warning for the cell that hit the taxi. 10 minutes is nowhere near your claim of seeing potential storms developing for hours or more. I.e, what happened is exactly what you said can't happen. Your claim that "we can see one developing for a couple hours or more" is now unequivocally proven to be total BS, just as we all suspected. Steve |
Radar on a cell phone
schlackoff, you bring nothing of any value to any discussion. Not sure whether
you are too dumb not to sit in dog****, or you just like to. btw, do you suppose the water taxi driver was told about the winds coming. that's the news report, which may be wrong. but schlackoff just wants to say the driver was totally unable to see what was coming, thus excusing schlackoff from seeing what's coming. maybe schlackoff isn't dumb? maybe he is lazy? schlackoff, re-read what you wrote and be embarrassed for yourself, for you are unequivically stating that a.) the operator of the water taxi was unable to see the weather developing, and b.) a cell phone would have. Seems like you can't even understand simple english. Nowhere did I say anything about a cell phone. I'll say it again, your statement: "jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more." has been proven to be wrong. Again, there's no mention of a cellphone in your statement and I didn't say anything about a cellphone either. The only thing I'm saying is that your statement above is wrong. That's it, nothing more. Can you comprehend that? Steve schlackoff? Are you saying the CG should require that ALL water taxis carry -- and monitor -- a radar enabled cell phone? Um, no. I'm saying that, as many have argued in the thread and as has now been proven, your statement (quoted here again:) jeff, ONLY a sailor of training wheels is totally oblivious to an approaching thunderstorm until 10 minutes before it arrives. The rest of us know their potential exists for that particular day well before we cast off, and we can see one developing for a couple hours or more. This ain't rocket science, except to those floating on training wheels (who be definition are scared squatless of the water). is total BS. Do suppose it might be more effective to require water taxi drivers to be able to understand weather? Hey! Wait a minute! Water taxi drivers are required to be able to understand weather. Understanding the weather wouldn't have mattered a whit in this case, which is the point. There was a total of 10 minutes of warning for the cell that hit the taxi. 10 minutes is nowhere near your claim of seeing potential storms developing for hours or more. I.e, what happened is exactly what you said can't happen. Your claim that "we can see one developing for a couple hours or more" is now unequivocally proven to be total BS, just as we all suspected. Steve |
Radar on a cell phone
|
Radar on a cell phone
|
Radar on a cell phone
schlackoff, it is a sad fact that you consume oxygen that might otherwise be
used by human beings. Not sure about lazy, but definitely dumb. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com