Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles,
I'm originally from Brockville & noticed your message about the length of the Lakers when I was doing a search. My father was a ship's master on them and they were very long for a reason, to get through the locks on the St. Lawrence. There are no other ships around the world with the Laker's narrow configuration. Cynde "Charles T. Low" wrote in message ... This is larger than the Titanic by far. Interestingly (to me), many of the lake freighters which sift by my small city of Brockville on the St. Lawrence Seaway are longer than the Titanic. Perhaps it was a big ship _for its time_. With some difficulty, I found a QM2 specifications page at www. cunard.co.uk, which said this: ==== Length: 345 meters / 1,132 feet Beam: 41 meters / 135 feet Beam at Bridge Wings: 45 meters / 147.5 feet Draft: 10 meters / 32 feet 10 inches Height (Keel to Funnel): 72 meters / 236.2 feet Gross Tonnage: Approximately 150,000 gross tons Passengers: 2,620 Crew: 1,253 Top Speed: Approximately 30 knots (34.5 mph) Power: 157,000 horsepower, environmentally friendly, gas turbine/diesel electric plant Propulsion: Four pods of 21.5 MW each; 2 fixed and 2 azimuthing Strength: Extra thick steel hull for strength and stability for Atlantic crossings Stabilizers: Two sets Cost: Estimated $800 million dollars ==== Charles T. Low - remove "UN" www.boatdocking.com www.ctlow.ca/Trojan26 - my boat |