Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:01:24 -0700, Ian
wrote: On 15 Oct, 14:19, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:31:30 -0700, Ian wrote: What force do you think does work against gravity to allow aeroplanes to ascend? Thrust from the engine, of course. Nope. How many aircraft do you think are capable of vertical takeoff? Handwaving. The only possible source for the increase in the gravitational potential energy is the engines. Wings impart no energy that is not their function. There is drag that goes with lift, and engines have to impart energy to overcome it. I have had a commercial pilots license for more than forty years, if you want more handwaving. A Boeing 747-400 has a take off weight of 875,000 lbf and a total thrust of 4 x 63,300 = 253,200 lbf. My own aircraft has a take off mass of 370kg and no thrust whatsoever, and yet I can get it to go up. Not in still air. You can get it to sink into a mass of rising air. Or do you have a balloon. Those burners suck fuel like an engine, the chief concern is having a source of energy same as with an engine. Casady |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Oct, 00:11, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:01:24 -0700, Ian wrote: On 15 Oct, 14:19, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:31:30 -0700, Ian wrote: What force do you think does work against gravity to allow aeroplanes to ascend? Thrust from the engine, of course. Nope. How many aircraft do you think are capable of vertical takeoff? Handwaving. The only possible source for the increase in the gravitational potential energy is the engines. Wings impart no energy that is not their function. There is drag that goes with lift, and engines have to impart energy to overcome it. I have had a commercial pilots license for more than forty years, if you want more handwaving. The question was not "where does the energy come from?". The question was "what force ... does work against gravity ...?" and (save for a trivially small downwards component) that ain't thrust. My own aircraft has a take off mass of 370kg and no thrust whatsoever, and yet I can get it to go up. Not in still air. A glider can climb in still air. Not for very long, normally, but it can certainly climb. No thrust. Or do you have a balloon. Those burners suck fuel like an engine, the chief concern is having a source of energy same as with an engine. How do you think helium balloons work? Ian |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:13:56 -0700, Ian
wrote: How do you think helium balloons work? You have me there. However, how many do you think are in use? I would guess somewhere between zero and none. For all practical purposes they don't exist. Myself, I like to fly small hydrogen balloons. Dry cleaner bags. You dissolve aluminum chips in lye to get the hydrogen. Casady |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Oct, 14:32, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:13:56 -0700, Ian wrote: How do you think helium balloons work? You have me there. However, how many do you think are in use? I would guess somewhere between zero and none. For all practical purposes they don't exist. Doesn't mean they don't work. Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No Rewrites Required! | ASA | |||
The Physics of Sailing | Cruising | |||
The Physics of Paddling | General | |||
Nordhavn 43 - What you think? | Cruising | |||
Physics Question | General |