Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:06:00 -0000, otnmbrd
wrote: Larry wrote in news:Xns99ADAD78CF807noonehomecom@ 208.49.80.253: Celestial Navigation, while quite romantic and "salty", are no longer necessary for worldwide navigation. Larry No longer necessary, true, but for a long distance sailor the ability to use it can/could come in handy for many reasons. Hell, we could say that the Mark 1 eyeball or soundings are no longer necessary, but we still use them and find good reasons to do so. You know it's kind of funny. Everyone talks about using an archaic method of determining position and never mention using either a lead line to determine depth or a chip log to determine speed. How come all the advocates of a relative low tech method of determining a position never mention that the system is unusable for navigation in tight spaces, narrow channels, etc. and dead reckoning or taking sights or measuring depth will be necessary. I never hear anyone recommend having a lead line on board in case your electronic depth sounder fails or a chip log mounted on the stern pulpit in case your electronic speed log fails. I am not saying that one shouldn't learn celestial navigation or not carry extra life jackets but it is no longer a necessary skill. Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Celestial Navigation Weekend | Cruising | |||
Celestial Navigation Seminar at Sea | Tall Ships | |||
Celestial Navigation | ASA | |||
Celestial Navigation question | General | |||
Celestial Navigation question | Cruising |