BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Cruising (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/)
-   -   FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/8549-frs-gmrs-radio-fcc-licensing.html)

Gary Schafer December 27th 03 05:36 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing
 
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:18:11 GMT, (Larry W4CSC) wrote:

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 22:09:12 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote:

Actuallly it was Radio Shack on this one......


No, Moto is the reason it has a 1/2w transmitter and the private
license fees are so rediculously high for other services. Motorola
wants everyone that needs a walkie talkie to buy TRUNKED RADIO SERVICE
from, who else, THEM!

A friend of mine applied to the private licensing contractor the FCC
uses to get a 150 Mhz band system license to put up a nice repeater
with a couple of base stations and a bunch of mobiles. He's in the
paging business and has been for 30+ years. They actually tried to
pull a fast one and told him there were no licenses available....until
he filed suit in court. Suddenly, all those dead 150 Mhz frequencies
we had been monitoring for 6 months WERE, in fact, available for
license. One of Moto's strings must have broken. One of the nice
walkies is sitting on my desk. I heard him calling his wife, earlier.
We even have a telephone interconnect I can use if my cellphone
coverage sucks. The repeater runs high power from 800' up a tower and
my 7 watt walkie works 70 miles inland.

My point was Motorola doesn't WANT you to have private, untaxed
communications over a mile or so.....see?



There were other companies selling those cheap radios long before
motorola got in that end of the business. Remember Ritron, Maxon etc.

Motorola sold more "private" repeater systems than anyone else. They
sold many thousands of them.

At one time there were no private vhf repeater frequencies available
except for low power short range stuff. Only public safety and
industrial.

Regards
Gary




Rich Hampel December 27th 03 06:33 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio ----- "tweaking"
 
I get your message! nothing like a captive market/audience.

'nother question: since these GMRS radios are so close in frequency to
the UHF business bands, can they be 'tweaked' to these frequencies ---
a la 464 mHz????

Rich Hampel December 27th 03 06:33 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio ----- "tweaking"
 
I get your message! nothing like a captive market/audience.

'nother question: since these GMRS radios are so close in frequency to
the UHF business bands, can they be 'tweaked' to these frequencies ---
a la 464 mHz????

sailor December 27th 03 07:27 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing
 
GMRS has been out many, many more years than FRS. Originally designed for
the service they now provide. The rules established at that time required a
license. As with all things Government, it is much easier to establish a law
than to change it. Many use GMRS without licensing altho' strictly you are
supposed to get one.


"Keith" wrote in message
...
Well, I got a nice little Christmas present, a pair of Motorola T4500 FRS
(or so I thought) radios. Seems that these broadcast on both the FRS (Family
Radio Service) channels and the newer GMRS (General Mobile Radio Service)
frequencies.

When FRS came out, they were nice little radios that didn't require a
license, and had a good range, relatively inexpensive, etc. Of course,
somebody couldn't leave good enough, so they came out with the GMRS
frequencies. The radios use a higher power on the GMRS frequencies.

Well guess what? To be strictly legal, you have to get a license for these
new GMRS frequencies. $75 for 5 years from the FCC, you have to fill out
forms 605 and 159. Now, I can of course operate these radios on channels
8-14 ONLY without a license and be legal, because these are the old FRS
frequencies. Sheesh, the license is more than the radios!

Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to
apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just
another taxation scheme.



sailor December 27th 03 07:27 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing
 
GMRS has been out many, many more years than FRS. Originally designed for
the service they now provide. The rules established at that time required a
license. As with all things Government, it is much easier to establish a law
than to change it. Many use GMRS without licensing altho' strictly you are
supposed to get one.


"Keith" wrote in message
...
Well, I got a nice little Christmas present, a pair of Motorola T4500 FRS
(or so I thought) radios. Seems that these broadcast on both the FRS (Family
Radio Service) channels and the newer GMRS (General Mobile Radio Service)
frequencies.

When FRS came out, they were nice little radios that didn't require a
license, and had a good range, relatively inexpensive, etc. Of course,
somebody couldn't leave good enough, so they came out with the GMRS
frequencies. The radios use a higher power on the GMRS frequencies.

Well guess what? To be strictly legal, you have to get a license for these
new GMRS frequencies. $75 for 5 years from the FCC, you have to fill out
forms 605 and 159. Now, I can of course operate these radios on channels
8-14 ONLY without a license and be legal, because these are the old FRS
frequencies. Sheesh, the license is more than the radios!

Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to
apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just
another taxation scheme.



Billy Bob December 27th 03 09:29 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing
 
Gotta love this clown.

He begins his mean mouthed post by insulting the original poster's
intelligence when asking a reasonable question and then follows with:

"Unlisensed" which presumably means "unlicensed"

"therefor" which presumably means "therefore"

and ends his uncalled for "mouth off" by calling the orignal poster a
"MOORON" which presumably was meant to mean "moron"

Only a MORON can't spell MORON.

No wonder you're so insecure.

"Me", you're an idiot...or maybe I should spell it idjut so's youz can
figures it out fer yurself?


Me wrote


If you actually knew what you were talking about you would be DANGEROUS.
GMRS predates FRS by only about 30 years. FRS is an unlisensed Service
because the power of the radio's is small. GMRS Radios have more power
and therefor are capable of interfering with other radio systems that
SHARE the same frequencies. This is why they are LICENSED, so that if
you interfere with someone else's LICENSED system, they can identify you
and get you to STOP. If you aren't capable of filling out the LICENSE
FORM or can't AFFORD the fee, then you need to stay on FRS or CB where
Mooron's belong.

me



Billy Bob December 27th 03 09:29 PM

FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing
 
Gotta love this clown.

He begins his mean mouthed post by insulting the original poster's
intelligence when asking a reasonable question and then follows with:

"Unlisensed" which presumably means "unlicensed"

"therefor" which presumably means "therefore"

and ends his uncalled for "mouth off" by calling the orignal poster a
"MOORON" which presumably was meant to mean "moron"

Only a MORON can't spell MORON.

No wonder you're so insecure.

"Me", you're an idiot...or maybe I should spell it idjut so's youz can
figures it out fer yurself?


Me wrote


If you actually knew what you were talking about you would be DANGEROUS.
GMRS predates FRS by only about 30 years. FRS is an unlisensed Service
because the power of the radio's is small. GMRS Radios have more power
and therefor are capable of interfering with other radio systems that
SHARE the same frequencies. This is why they are LICENSED, so that if
you interfere with someone else's LICENSED system, they can identify you
and get you to STOP. If you aren't capable of filling out the LICENSE
FORM or can't AFFORD the fee, then you need to stay on FRS or CB where
Mooron's belong.

me




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com