Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
That's true. I have a freid that departed here in October
for the BVIs. Was going to stop for fuel in the Bahamas. He ended going down the coast instead. Doug s/v Callista "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:yshFb.9051$JD6.9037@lakeread04... Kelton Joyner wrote: It seems that the people not going to the Bahamas has had an impact on the economy. The recently announced that the permit is now good for muntiple entries. Two within 90 days. Now that probably doesn,t help people who come down from the north for a couple weeks-months, it does help those of us who like to jump over to Bimini for a weekend every few weekends. Kelton s/v Isle Escape What has me bugged is that it does not matter if you are "cruising" or not. You have to pay just to transit Bahamian waters. I am working a return delivery, Tortola/Ft. Lauderdale in January. Our three man crew usually works on a set fee pluss airfare and gets to keep anything over expenses. Because time is money we normally only stop at Puerto Plata and Georgetown but $300 is a bit much to pay for one evening on dry ground. Looks like we will have to make the run up the Old Bahama Channel and hope we don't meet any Cuban gunboats. It is going to be a long slog. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
"Rosalie B." wrote in message ... x-no-archive:yes "Doug Dotson" wrote: Why didin't you say so. If Bob doesn't want to go then that's it. WX windows are just a fact of life, we had to wait 6 weeks last year. But six weeks anchored in Lake Worth beats anything up here in Maryland. We haven't been to Lake Worth since our first trip down - we avoid that whole area and just wait in Ft. Pierce until we can get offshore to Miami. (Our daughter and grandchildren live in Miami, and we kind of like Miami.) We would never leave to go to the Bahamas from that far north anyway - our boat is too slow. Going to the Bahamas from Ft Pierce would be a slog. We went on the outside from Fernandina to Ft Pierce and then inside to Lake Worth. Returning to Ft Pierce is not bad if you are a US citizen. We buddied with our Kanuk friends who have to check back in person anyway, so Lake Worth is where we reentered. I can agree that the Bahamas aren't that great. But again aren't that bad. You made it sound like the fee and reentry changes are the reasons you chose The fee and the re-entry changes ARE the reasons Bob has chosen not to go this year. And maybe a bit because of his heart attack two years ago, but that is completely unexpressed, so I may be altogether wrong about that. I still have some level of anxiety from that which causes me to keep asking him what he's doing or does he feel OK which irritates him - so if I think of it in time, I try not to ask those questions. Tha's good. Health is way more important than cruising. Cruising, especially on a sailboat, is alot of work and stress. As I said before, an extra $200 in the grand scheme of things is not a big deal (although it does **** me off). The reentry procedure is now the same for US citizens as it had been for non-citizens for yesrs. Doesn't keep them away. I'm somewhat less comfortable in lively conditions than I was before, and I didn't really like them before. We don't enjoy getting bounced around either. not to go this year. Just those items are an unfortunate fact of life and a minor inconvenience. We anchor out most of the time and rarely stay at marinas as well. Nobody ever made fun of us for it. Just the opposite actually. You've got it backwards - we stay in marinas almost all the time and people think we spend too much money that way. (Not that it is any of their business really.) Maybe I misstated myself. We stay at anchor 90% of the time and save mucho $$$. They wish they had the skill and confidence to do it and save all the money we did. Doug s/v Callista We anchor out pretty much all the time so marina costs are not much concern. "Doug Dotson" wrote: Rosalie, Why are you depriving yourself of one of the finer points of life just for a few extra dollars and a few extra procedures to comply with? Your protest affects no one but yourself. Life is too short. BOb doesn't want to go. Therefore, I'm not going. There's a lot of hassle to going to the Bahamas (I mean finding a weather window etc.), and I just don't like the Bahamas THAT much that I'm willing to put up with the extra fee, and the extra hassle on coming back. Some folks kind of look down on us because we don't anchor out every night but spend money on marinas. And here you are telling me it's just a few extra dollars. As I said - we could probably afford the fee if that was all it was. "Jerry" wrote: Hopefully it will keep some of the rift-raft out. I'm sorry you feel that way about us. We aren't going this year -- but in our case it's more because of the new 'homeland security' regulations in regard to immigration than to the Bahamas entry fees although that is a part of it too. I think the new regulations are stupid and because they do not increase security at all but just penalize the honest people I'm not willing to go to jail or be fined to demonstrate that it IS stupid. I just don't know how to get through the institutionalized stupidity. "RWKxxx" wrote in message ... We plan to go around the 10th of January I am sorry to see anyone going to the Bahamas as long as they have that ridicules $300 entry free in place. It will be corrected only when enough people stay away. grandma Rosalie |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
"Rosalie B." wrote in message ... x-no-archive:yes "Doug Dotson" wrote: Why didin't you say so. If Bob doesn't want to go then that's it. WX windows are just a fact of life, we had to wait 6 weeks last year. But six weeks anchored in Lake Worth beats anything up here in Maryland. We haven't been to Lake Worth since our first trip down - we avoid that whole area and just wait in Ft. Pierce until we can get offshore to Miami. (Our daughter and grandchildren live in Miami, and we kind of like Miami.) We would never leave to go to the Bahamas from that far north anyway - our boat is too slow. Going to the Bahamas from Ft Pierce would be a slog. We went on the outside from Fernandina to Ft Pierce and then inside to Lake Worth. Returning to Ft Pierce is not bad if you are a US citizen. We buddied with our Kanuk friends who have to check back in person anyway, so Lake Worth is where we reentered. I can agree that the Bahamas aren't that great. But again aren't that bad. You made it sound like the fee and reentry changes are the reasons you chose The fee and the re-entry changes ARE the reasons Bob has chosen not to go this year. And maybe a bit because of his heart attack two years ago, but that is completely unexpressed, so I may be altogether wrong about that. I still have some level of anxiety from that which causes me to keep asking him what he's doing or does he feel OK which irritates him - so if I think of it in time, I try not to ask those questions. Tha's good. Health is way more important than cruising. Cruising, especially on a sailboat, is alot of work and stress. As I said before, an extra $200 in the grand scheme of things is not a big deal (although it does **** me off). The reentry procedure is now the same for US citizens as it had been for non-citizens for yesrs. Doesn't keep them away. I'm somewhat less comfortable in lively conditions than I was before, and I didn't really like them before. We don't enjoy getting bounced around either. not to go this year. Just those items are an unfortunate fact of life and a minor inconvenience. We anchor out most of the time and rarely stay at marinas as well. Nobody ever made fun of us for it. Just the opposite actually. You've got it backwards - we stay in marinas almost all the time and people think we spend too much money that way. (Not that it is any of their business really.) Maybe I misstated myself. We stay at anchor 90% of the time and save mucho $$$. They wish they had the skill and confidence to do it and save all the money we did. Doug s/v Callista We anchor out pretty much all the time so marina costs are not much concern. "Doug Dotson" wrote: Rosalie, Why are you depriving yourself of one of the finer points of life just for a few extra dollars and a few extra procedures to comply with? Your protest affects no one but yourself. Life is too short. BOb doesn't want to go. Therefore, I'm not going. There's a lot of hassle to going to the Bahamas (I mean finding a weather window etc.), and I just don't like the Bahamas THAT much that I'm willing to put up with the extra fee, and the extra hassle on coming back. Some folks kind of look down on us because we don't anchor out every night but spend money on marinas. And here you are telling me it's just a few extra dollars. As I said - we could probably afford the fee if that was all it was. "Jerry" wrote: Hopefully it will keep some of the rift-raft out. I'm sorry you feel that way about us. We aren't going this year -- but in our case it's more because of the new 'homeland security' regulations in regard to immigration than to the Bahamas entry fees although that is a part of it too. I think the new regulations are stupid and because they do not increase security at all but just penalize the honest people I'm not willing to go to jail or be fined to demonstrate that it IS stupid. I just don't know how to get through the institutionalized stupidity. "RWKxxx" wrote in message ... We plan to go around the 10th of January I am sorry to see anyone going to the Bahamas as long as they have that ridicules $300 entry free in place. It will be corrected only when enough people stay away. grandma Rosalie |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
All good points. Probably better to post them in a newsgroup
that is oriented toward such things. Doug s/v Callista "stealth" wrote in message ... "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:lFgFb.9050$JD6.3215@lakeread04... stealth wrote: What exactly have our leaders changed regarding homeland security going offshore and back? Given the dog and pony show they are selling in the name of our safety, I can only imagine the lunacy that they have implemented against law abiding U. S. citizens that are boaters. As an airline pilot and avid aviator, I get to witness the idiocy you mention first hand! TSA is nothing more than smoke and mirrors for the duped public who falsely believe otherwise. Here is the latest word on Bahamas/South Florida clearing. First the bahamian Government has softened a little. You can now exit and return once in the first 90 days of the year long cruising permit. They have also made it clearer that you are not to be charged overtime fees or for the dinghy either on deck or towed. On the US side, you can still clear customs by phone if you have a sticker but Immigration wants in person check in. Once you have tied up you have to take a $40 taxi ride to the airport or to Dodge Island. While the crew is spending the day checking into the US, Osama can unload the neuclear device and check into the Holliday Inn. If I understand you correctly, customs never once visits the actual boat? Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish as to who is dumber; those that create these idiotic laws or the people who continually vote these idiots into office and allow it to continue. TSA is a farce and nothing more than a police state affair that gives the uninformed a false warm and cozy feeling that they are safe from terrorist harm. It amazes me how many people I meet in my travels actually believe that the government/TSA is doing an outstanding job of protecting us. Point in case, they strip search airline pilots in plain view of the passengers, take away their nail clippers, and then allow them to board the flight deck which contains a crash axe, flares, AND complete control of the aircraft. It would seem logical that rather than worrying about every pair of nail clippers that may or may not get on a flight, safety would be better served if we concerned ourselves more with "who" is on the flight rather than "what". If someone of middle eastern origin balks at removing their turban for inspection due to religious reasons, they are allowed to pass through security without fail due to the fact they we don't want to racial profile for fear of making anyone angry. Make note that all successful terrorist hijackers have been from those of the middle east. Yet, TSA will demand that an elderly and frail grandmother in a wheel chair be searched with no exceptions if they so choose. In addition, if a crew member refuses to remove their hat, they WILL be fired, and the TSA (not the FAA) now has full authority to revoke the airmen certificates (license) of anyone that they (again, not the FAA) deems a national security threat. This interpretation of who and why is at the sole discretion of the TSA. Currently, there is no check and balance of this outrageous power, and as such, we are at the mercy of minimum wage high school drop outs in determining who can board and who cannot. My point is that we have the technology to determine with utmost certainty the identity of any one individual, yet we choose to allow ourselves to be scrutinized by a police state mentality in the name of safety. I realize I am getting off topic for which this group is intended, but I lurk in this group from time to time as it is my intention to buy a 35'-40' in the near future and dock it in the Miami area. And as a law abiding citizen, I would like to be able to retain the freedom to float my boat at will without constantly being treated like a common criminal. As such, witnessing what the government has done in the name of safety to the aviation sector, both commercial and private, the topic of new TSA rules boating to and from the Bahamas peaked my curiosity. Thanks for the reply. s |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
All good points. Probably better to post them in a newsgroup
that is oriented toward such things. Doug s/v Callista "stealth" wrote in message ... "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:lFgFb.9050$JD6.3215@lakeread04... stealth wrote: What exactly have our leaders changed regarding homeland security going offshore and back? Given the dog and pony show they are selling in the name of our safety, I can only imagine the lunacy that they have implemented against law abiding U. S. citizens that are boaters. As an airline pilot and avid aviator, I get to witness the idiocy you mention first hand! TSA is nothing more than smoke and mirrors for the duped public who falsely believe otherwise. Here is the latest word on Bahamas/South Florida clearing. First the bahamian Government has softened a little. You can now exit and return once in the first 90 days of the year long cruising permit. They have also made it clearer that you are not to be charged overtime fees or for the dinghy either on deck or towed. On the US side, you can still clear customs by phone if you have a sticker but Immigration wants in person check in. Once you have tied up you have to take a $40 taxi ride to the airport or to Dodge Island. While the crew is spending the day checking into the US, Osama can unload the neuclear device and check into the Holliday Inn. If I understand you correctly, customs never once visits the actual boat? Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish as to who is dumber; those that create these idiotic laws or the people who continually vote these idiots into office and allow it to continue. TSA is a farce and nothing more than a police state affair that gives the uninformed a false warm and cozy feeling that they are safe from terrorist harm. It amazes me how many people I meet in my travels actually believe that the government/TSA is doing an outstanding job of protecting us. Point in case, they strip search airline pilots in plain view of the passengers, take away their nail clippers, and then allow them to board the flight deck which contains a crash axe, flares, AND complete control of the aircraft. It would seem logical that rather than worrying about every pair of nail clippers that may or may not get on a flight, safety would be better served if we concerned ourselves more with "who" is on the flight rather than "what". If someone of middle eastern origin balks at removing their turban for inspection due to religious reasons, they are allowed to pass through security without fail due to the fact they we don't want to racial profile for fear of making anyone angry. Make note that all successful terrorist hijackers have been from those of the middle east. Yet, TSA will demand that an elderly and frail grandmother in a wheel chair be searched with no exceptions if they so choose. In addition, if a crew member refuses to remove their hat, they WILL be fired, and the TSA (not the FAA) now has full authority to revoke the airmen certificates (license) of anyone that they (again, not the FAA) deems a national security threat. This interpretation of who and why is at the sole discretion of the TSA. Currently, there is no check and balance of this outrageous power, and as such, we are at the mercy of minimum wage high school drop outs in determining who can board and who cannot. My point is that we have the technology to determine with utmost certainty the identity of any one individual, yet we choose to allow ourselves to be scrutinized by a police state mentality in the name of safety. I realize I am getting off topic for which this group is intended, but I lurk in this group from time to time as it is my intention to buy a 35'-40' in the near future and dock it in the Miami area. And as a law abiding citizen, I would like to be able to retain the freedom to float my boat at will without constantly being treated like a common criminal. As such, witnessing what the government has done in the name of safety to the aviation sector, both commercial and private, the topic of new TSA rules boating to and from the Bahamas peaked my curiosity. Thanks for the reply. s |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
We checked back in via a cellphone. From what I understand
the whole process now has to be done in person. Doug s/v Callista "Rosalie B." wrote in message ... x-no-archive:yes "stealth" wrote: "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:lFgFb.9050$JD6.3215@lakeread04... stealth wrote: What exactly have our leaders changed regarding homeland security going offshore and back? Given the dog and pony show they are selling in the name of our safety, I can only imagine the lunacy that they have implemented against law abiding U. S. citizens that are boaters. As an airline pilot and avid aviator, I get to witness the idiocy you mention first hand! TSA is nothing more than smoke and mirrors for the duped public who falsely believe otherwise. Here is the latest word on Bahamas/South Florida clearing. First the bahamian Government has softened a little. You can now exit and return once in the first 90 days of the year long cruising permit. They have also made it clearer that you are not to be charged overtime fees or for the dinghy either on deck or towed. On the US side, you can still clear customs by phone if you have a sticker but Immigration wants in person check in. Once you have tied up you have to take a $40 taxi ride to the airport or to Dodge Island. While the crew is spending the day checking into the US, Osama can unload the neuclear device and check into the Holliday Inn. If I understand you correctly, customs never once visits the actual boat? Well that's not quite correct. You can clear customs or at least start the procedure by phone (although they do insist on a land line - you can't or aren't supposed to be able to do it by cell phone although I have managed to do so) whether or not you have a sticker. If you don't have a sticker, you have to get one and then phone and tell them the number to finish the clearing in process. (This is only for boats over a certain length BTW) But customs can, at their discretion, require you to wait at the dock for them to actually visit the boat and do an inspection in person. I'm pretty sure this is still the same. I heard that some ports of entry were more likely to do an in person inspection than others. I think it's pretty much the same in the Bahamas depending on the port. In Bimini, Chub, West End, Morgan's Bluff and other small places, one person gets off the boat and checks in with customs and then with immigration. Actually I think at Morgan's Bluff you anchor and they come out to you. Sometimes customs and immigration are the same person and sometimes not. In Nassau or Lucaya, you tie up to the dock and wait for them to get around to visiting your boat. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish as to who is dumber; those that create these idiotic laws or the people who continually vote these idiots into office and allow it to continue. TSA is a farce and nothing more than a police state affair that gives the uninformed a false warm and cozy feeling that they are safe from terrorist harm. It amazes me how many people I meet in my travels actually believe that the government/TSA is doing an outstanding job of protecting us. Point in case, they strip search airline pilots in plain view of the passengers, take away their nail clippers, and then allow them to board the flight deck which contains a crash axe, flares, AND complete control of the aircraft. It would seem logical that rather than worrying about every pair of nail clippers that may or may not get on a flight, safety would be better served if we concerned ourselves more with "who" is on the flight rather than "what". If someone of middle eastern origin balks at removing their turban for inspection due to religious reasons, they are allowed to pass through security without fail due to the fact they we don't want to racial profile for fear of making anyone angry. Make note that all successful terrorist hijackers have been from those of the middle east. Yet, TSA will demand that an elderly and frail grandmother in a wheel chair be searched with no exceptions if they so choose. In addition, if a crew member refuses to remove their hat, they WILL be fired, and the TSA (not the FAA) now has full authority to revoke the airmen certificates (license) of anyone that they (again, not the FAA) deems a national security threat. This interpretation of who and why is at the sole discretion of the TSA. Currently, there is no check and balance of this outrageous power, and as such, we are at the mercy of minimum wage high school drop outs in determining who can board and who cannot. My point is that we have the technology to determine with utmost certainty the identity of any one individual, yet we choose to allow ourselves to be scrutinized by a police state mentality in the name of safety. I realize I am getting off topic for which this group is intended, but I lurk in this group from time to time as it is my intention to buy a 35'-40' in the near future and dock it in the Miami area. And as a law abiding citizen, I would like to be able to retain the freedom to float my boat at will without constantly being treated like a common criminal. As such, witnessing what the government has done in the name of safety to the aviation sector, both commercial and private, the topic of new TSA rules boating to and from the Bahamas peaked my curiosity. Thanks for the reply. s grandma Rosalie |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
We checked back in via a cellphone. From what I understand
the whole process now has to be done in person. Doug s/v Callista "Rosalie B." wrote in message ... x-no-archive:yes "stealth" wrote: "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:lFgFb.9050$JD6.3215@lakeread04... stealth wrote: What exactly have our leaders changed regarding homeland security going offshore and back? Given the dog and pony show they are selling in the name of our safety, I can only imagine the lunacy that they have implemented against law abiding U. S. citizens that are boaters. As an airline pilot and avid aviator, I get to witness the idiocy you mention first hand! TSA is nothing more than smoke and mirrors for the duped public who falsely believe otherwise. Here is the latest word on Bahamas/South Florida clearing. First the bahamian Government has softened a little. You can now exit and return once in the first 90 days of the year long cruising permit. They have also made it clearer that you are not to be charged overtime fees or for the dinghy either on deck or towed. On the US side, you can still clear customs by phone if you have a sticker but Immigration wants in person check in. Once you have tied up you have to take a $40 taxi ride to the airport or to Dodge Island. While the crew is spending the day checking into the US, Osama can unload the neuclear device and check into the Holliday Inn. If I understand you correctly, customs never once visits the actual boat? Well that's not quite correct. You can clear customs or at least start the procedure by phone (although they do insist on a land line - you can't or aren't supposed to be able to do it by cell phone although I have managed to do so) whether or not you have a sticker. If you don't have a sticker, you have to get one and then phone and tell them the number to finish the clearing in process. (This is only for boats over a certain length BTW) But customs can, at their discretion, require you to wait at the dock for them to actually visit the boat and do an inspection in person. I'm pretty sure this is still the same. I heard that some ports of entry were more likely to do an in person inspection than others. I think it's pretty much the same in the Bahamas depending on the port. In Bimini, Chub, West End, Morgan's Bluff and other small places, one person gets off the boat and checks in with customs and then with immigration. Actually I think at Morgan's Bluff you anchor and they come out to you. Sometimes customs and immigration are the same person and sometimes not. In Nassau or Lucaya, you tie up to the dock and wait for them to get around to visiting your boat. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish as to who is dumber; those that create these idiotic laws or the people who continually vote these idiots into office and allow it to continue. TSA is a farce and nothing more than a police state affair that gives the uninformed a false warm and cozy feeling that they are safe from terrorist harm. It amazes me how many people I meet in my travels actually believe that the government/TSA is doing an outstanding job of protecting us. Point in case, they strip search airline pilots in plain view of the passengers, take away their nail clippers, and then allow them to board the flight deck which contains a crash axe, flares, AND complete control of the aircraft. It would seem logical that rather than worrying about every pair of nail clippers that may or may not get on a flight, safety would be better served if we concerned ourselves more with "who" is on the flight rather than "what". If someone of middle eastern origin balks at removing their turban for inspection due to religious reasons, they are allowed to pass through security without fail due to the fact they we don't want to racial profile for fear of making anyone angry. Make note that all successful terrorist hijackers have been from those of the middle east. Yet, TSA will demand that an elderly and frail grandmother in a wheel chair be searched with no exceptions if they so choose. In addition, if a crew member refuses to remove their hat, they WILL be fired, and the TSA (not the FAA) now has full authority to revoke the airmen certificates (license) of anyone that they (again, not the FAA) deems a national security threat. This interpretation of who and why is at the sole discretion of the TSA. Currently, there is no check and balance of this outrageous power, and as such, we are at the mercy of minimum wage high school drop outs in determining who can board and who cannot. My point is that we have the technology to determine with utmost certainty the identity of any one individual, yet we choose to allow ourselves to be scrutinized by a police state mentality in the name of safety. I realize I am getting off topic for which this group is intended, but I lurk in this group from time to time as it is my intention to buy a 35'-40' in the near future and dock it in the Miami area. And as a law abiding citizen, I would like to be able to retain the freedom to float my boat at will without constantly being treated like a common criminal. As such, witnessing what the government has done in the name of safety to the aviation sector, both commercial and private, the topic of new TSA rules boating to and from the Bahamas peaked my curiosity. Thanks for the reply. s grandma Rosalie |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
... Looks like we will have to make the run up the Old Bahama Channel and hope we don't meet any Cuban gunboats. I was unaware this had become a problem. Bush and Rumsfeld have established that Osama is wintering in Havana, of course. This was obvious once the CIA conclusively demonstrated that the Tropicana chorus line are now appearing in bourkas. -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
... Looks like we will have to make the run up the Old Bahama Channel and hope we don't meet any Cuban gunboats. I was unaware this had become a problem. Bush and Rumsfeld have established that Osama is wintering in Havana, of course. This was obvious once the CIA conclusively demonstrated that the Tropicana chorus line are now appearing in bourkas. -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Cruising Bahamas
Armond Perretta wrote: Glenn Ashmore wrote: ... Looks like we will have to make the run up the Old Bahama Channel and hope we don't meet any Cuban gunboats. I was unaware this had become a problem. Bush and Rumsfeld have established that Osama is wintering in Havana, of course. This was obvious once the CIA conclusively demonstrated that the Tropicana chorus line are now appearing in bourkas. I am more concerned about the CNB weapons that the Dubya tried to claim Castro was building. Bet everyone forgot about that. Bush got caught in a big lie and evidently didn't learn much when he came up with the Iraq justification. - Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BAHAMAS RELAXES CRUISING FEE TO ALLOW MULTIPLE ENTRIES | General | |||
Fin keel spade rudder for cruising Bahamas & Caribbean? | Cruising | |||
Cruising the Bahamas | Cruising | |||
bahamas cruising permit | Cruising | |||
bahamas cruising permit 1000.00?? read on and weep. | Cruising |