Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 878
Default Albergs

Been looking at old Alberg 35s as a possible single handed cruiser.
The 35 was made by Ericson and Pearson and one other company.
Does anyone have a feel for any differences in quality between the
different builders?
Thanks
Gordon
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 95
Default Albergs

On Aug 13, 5:09 pm, Gordon wrote:
Been looking at old Alberg 35s as a possible single handed cruiser.
The 35 was made by Ericson and Pearson and one other company.
Does anyone have a feel for any differences in quality between the
different builders?
Thanks
Gordon


I Believe Hinterhoeller designed some of the Albergs. My Hr28 was a
very strong boat.

Terry K

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 244
Default Albergs

Gordon wrote:
Been looking at old Alberg 35s as a possible single handed cruiser.
The 35 was made by Ericson and Pearson and one other company.
Does anyone have a feel for any differences in quality between the
different builders?
Thanks
Gordon

Cape Dory, IIRC.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 44
Default Albergs

On Aug 13, 4:09 pm, Gordon wrote:
Been looking at old Alberg 35s as a possible single handed cruiser.
The 35 was made by Ericson and Pearson and one other company.
Does anyone have a feel for any differences in quality between the
different builders?
Thanks
Gordon


Good Old Boat Magazine did a article on the 35s you might be able to
track it down but anyway there is an interesting story on how Ericson
started building the Alberg 35s after Pearson abandoned the design.
Apparently the Pearson plant in Sausalito dumped the mold for the hull
at the dump because Pearson decided to concentrate all production on
the east coast. Anyway the workers were suppose to break up the mold
but didn't. Someone spotted the mold, trucked it down to Orange and
the rest is Ericson history. Bruce King did some redesigning on the
keel. Pearson later sued Ericson over the hull after they put the
Alberg 35 into production but lost the suit.
You notice how the later Ericsons have split windows? It's because
Columbia sued about the window design and won.
So Ericsons solution was to just split it.


Ericson was a new company and money was tight but they did not
compromise on quality. They did not cut corners on manufacturing. The
plant even had a water tank that they dunked each new yacht into to
test for water tight integrity.
The Ericson 41 was the boat to have at the time and did well in yacht
races so kept the company in the money.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017