Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arguably electronics can be made as reliable as anything else these
days, EXCEPT FOR LIGHTNING STRIKES. Reports here and on private lists suggest that any "near" strike takes out about 90% of all electronics around it. There are exceptions, but they are not consistent and most people report all electronics on board get totaled, often right down to and including the batteries. For this reason, you may want to factor the possible loss of _all_ electronics into your systems planning. Hi-tec requires trade offs for most of us: Eg. between time spent learning morse code or signal flags and that needed for assembling hi-tech electronics; the money spent on flares, fog horn, bells, and really good ground tackle as opposed to that spent for digital equipment. Time sailing and learning boat handling vs. time drawing up flow charts. I would suggest that it's a mistake, from the standpoint of seaworthiness, to put too many resources into hi-tec stuff if you short change the equally expensive but less toy-like basics. And once you acquire the basics, the hi-tec gizmos seem much less relavent or important. Learning _and practicing_ good coastal navigation is not trivial - but once you can do it, a GPS is optional. If you want hi-tec, get radar - _then learn how to use it properly_. The latter is time consuming and seriously non-trivial. Rufus Paul wrote: I've been wondering, what would be involved in having a computer interpret and display gauge readings. By this I mean something such as having a laptop receiving inputs from the various gauge sending units such as oil pressure, engine temp etc. and then displaying them in some way. I don't believe this is something I would actually do, it's just I was on a long drive yesterday and it got into my head and I would really like to figure it out. I've googled unsuccessfully (I'm ashamed to admit) so if anyone can point me in a direction ... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:06:46 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
I've been wondering, what would be involved in having a computer interpret and display gauge readings. For software see: http://www.cruzpro.com/seaviz.html and for hardware see the rest of the Cruzpro site as well. This solution involves gauges that send NMEA sentences. These are available from www.downwindmarine.com and (at better prices) from www.discount-marine.co.nz Best, Steve |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:06:46 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
I've been wondering, what would be involved in having a computer interpret and display gauge readings. For software see: http://www.cruzpro.com/seaviz.html and for hardware see the rest of the Cruzpro site as well. This solution involves gauges that send NMEA sentences. These are available from www.downwindmarine.com and (at better prices) from www.discount-marine.co.nz Best, Steve |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:06:46 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
I've been wondering, what would be involved in having a computer interpret and display gauge readings. By this I mean something such as having a laptop receiving inputs from the various gauge sending units such as oil pressure, engine temp etc. and then displaying them in some way. I don't believe this is something I would actually do, it's just I was on a long drive yesterday and it got into my head and I would really like to figure it out. I've googled unsuccessfully (I'm ashamed to admit) so if anyone can point me in a direction ... I'm not sure if you are talking about buying a solution or building one. If it's the former, someone already mentioned CruzPro. Their stuff looks nice, but I don't know anyone with personal experience using it. If ibuilding a solution interests you... I've talked to some engineer friends about designing the data capture hardware and they say it could be done rather cheaply with off the shelf parts. Serial and etherner driver chipsets are cheap, as are analog to digital convertors. Something like a PIC processor should handle assembling the data sentences easily. It's outside my current area of expertise, though The computer part is definitely doable, as you can see from my sig. The software is hard to build form the ground up, but if architected correctly, easy to extend to new instruments. For example, I can generally turn around a request to support a new NMEA sentence in less time than you'd believe. Adding a whole new guage takes a bit more time, but is still not a big deal. For engine instruments, I'd want to add more alarm functionality. Using built in sound functionality in Windows would be easy, but I think you'd really like an external alarm circuit with an annoying piezo. I already have the logging function, which to me would be the real value of using a computer in this application. You could track changes in things like oil pressure, fuel consumption at a given rpm, water temp, and alternator output over time. Of course, you could accomplish the same thing with mechanical instruments and a logbook. Logbooks are known to be highly resistant to lightning strikes and consume almost no power. :-) __________________________________________________ __________ Glen "Wiley" Wilson usenet1 SPAMNIX at worldwidewiley dot com To reply, lose the capitals and do the obvious. Take a look at cpRepeater, my NMEA data integrator, repeater, and logger at http://www.worldwidewiley.com/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Glen,
Actually I wasn't thinking of doing it at all, I was just noodling the idea -- wondering about the "how". However if I were to do it I would build it myself, and they would be in addition to standard gauges. The info I got here is plenty to keep me going for a while now. I also agree with the logbook preference, it's similar to a line I often used in the office when everyone had PDAs. I used a notebook and a daytimer and referred to them as analog assistants (PAAs?). They could survive a drop from quite a height, never ran out of batteries and you could access any data directly without having to deal with menus. I'm not sure if you are talking about buying a solution or building one. If it's the former, someone already mentioned CruzPro. Their stuff looks nice, but I don't know anyone with personal experience using it. If ibuilding a solution interests you... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:01:29 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
Hi Glen, Actually I wasn't thinking of doing it at all, I was just noodling the idea -- wondering about the "how". Better watch that. First, you have a random thought. Then you get interested enough to look into it a bit. Next thing you know, it's an obsession and you're spending all your free time making it happen. Don't ask me how I know this. ;-) __________________________________________________ __________ Glen "Wiley" Wilson usenet1 SPAMNIX at worldwidewiley dot com To reply, lose the capitals and do the obvious. Take a look at cpRepeater, my NMEA data integrator, repeater, and logger at http://www.worldwidewiley.com/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will not do this project. I will not do this project. I will not do this
project. I will not do this project. Well, at least not this week. :-) Better watch that. First, you have a random thought. Then you get interested enough to look into it a bit. Next thing you know, it's an obsession and you're spending all your free time making it happen. Don't ask me how I know this. ;-) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will not do this project. I will not do this project. I will not do this
project. I will not do this project. Well, at least not this week. :-) Better watch that. First, you have a random thought. Then you get interested enough to look into it a bit. Next thing you know, it's an obsession and you're spending all your free time making it happen. Don't ask me how I know this. ;-) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:01:29 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
Hi Glen, Actually I wasn't thinking of doing it at all, I was just noodling the idea -- wondering about the "how". Better watch that. First, you have a random thought. Then you get interested enough to look into it a bit. Next thing you know, it's an obsession and you're spending all your free time making it happen. Don't ask me how I know this. ;-) __________________________________________________ __________ Glen "Wiley" Wilson usenet1 SPAMNIX at worldwidewiley dot com To reply, lose the capitals and do the obvious. Take a look at cpRepeater, my NMEA data integrator, repeater, and logger at http://www.worldwidewiley.com/ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Glen,
Actually I wasn't thinking of doing it at all, I was just noodling the idea -- wondering about the "how". However if I were to do it I would build it myself, and they would be in addition to standard gauges. The info I got here is plenty to keep me going for a while now. I also agree with the logbook preference, it's similar to a line I often used in the office when everyone had PDAs. I used a notebook and a daytimer and referred to them as analog assistants (PAAs?). They could survive a drop from quite a height, never ran out of batteries and you could access any data directly without having to deal with menus. I'm not sure if you are talking about buying a solution or building one. If it's the former, someone already mentioned CruzPro. Their stuff looks nice, but I don't know anyone with personal experience using it. If ibuilding a solution interests you... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any way of testing dash board gauges? | Boat Building | |||
Any Way of testing dash board gauges? | General |