Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For boats w/out a bowsprit, a good thick strip of SS, say 3/16 x 1 (or
1-1/2), running down the stem from below the forestay fitting to the curve of the forefoot would help reduce damage. Would also help when indulging in a little "Chicago parking" into concrete docks at a couple knots... g Bowsprits usually have a stay (correct name escapes me at the moment) down to the water line. In this case you could run the SS strip from the lower end of the stay down the forefoot, but if you charged into anything above the water, you'd catch 'sprit stay. Probably the strip would still help, though. Rufus Jeff Morris wrote: Avoidance strategies might reduce the odds of collision somewhat, but not enough to consider the risk eliminated. Radar, for instance, might work in some conditions, but not all. This leaves two approaches: one, which has been discussed, is preparing to handle the damage efficiently. I'd be curious what percentage of collision damages event can be handled with a collision mat, and how many required abandoning ship. Clearly, when the damage is too severe, most vessels will sink like the proverbial stone, but there are certain levels of damage where a mat will save the day. The third approach is to reduce the odds of the vessel sinking, with positive floatation and/or collision bulkheads. Multihulls have an advantage, since they don't have the dead weight of the keel, and the hulls are shaped to facilitate flotation chambers. But any relatively light vessel can be made reasonably unsinkable. One can make a case that floatation bags are a better investment than a liferaft. |