Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If.....radar was THAT sensitive then why was I, sailing a 43 footer, nearly
run over by a tanker in the English Channel between Flushing and Lowestoft? The weather was stormy, rainy and it happened in the middle of the night during a downpour! And....vessels are not on auto pilot in that location. Radar is a tool, but it does not replace common sense ;-) -- c ya Wim www.cruising.ca/thousand/f-index.html "surfnturf" wrote in message news:xlMvb.461044$pl3.204000@pd7tw3no... : The waters cited are not prone to large swells, but I have been in a water : taxi late at night and seen the radar pick out logs and other debris on the : water. It was overcast, poor visibility and moderately high wind at the : time. : : Unfortunately, did not note manufacturer of unit. : : surfnturf : : "Doug Dotson" wrote in message : ... : Maybe on a dead calm sea. : : "Tom Dacon" wrote in message : ... : : : The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. : A : debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off : any : radar collision alarm.. : : : This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland : passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range : can : commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's : surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. : In : fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. : : Tom Dacon : : : : : : |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The waters cited are not prone to large swells, but I have been in a water
taxi late at night and seen the radar pick out logs and other debris on the water. It was overcast, poor visibility and moderately high wind at the time. Unfortunately, did not note manufacturer of unit. surfnturf "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... Maybe on a dead calm sea. "Tom Dacon" wrote in message ... The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. A debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off any radar collision alarm.. This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range can commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. In fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. Tom Dacon |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe on a dead calm sea.
"Tom Dacon" wrote in message ... The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. A debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off any radar collision alarm.. This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range can commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. In fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. Tom Dacon |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if your radar will pick up such a low profile object, how would you be
able to set an alarm to such a low threshole and not get false trigger from the just a slight chop. Your radar has better sensitivity than mine.. I would be happy if I could see a mooring bouy when coming into an anchorage at night. Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if your radar will pick up such a low profile object, how would you be
able to set an alarm to such a low threshole and not get false trigger from the just a slight chop. Your radar has better sensitivity than mine.. I would be happy if I could see a mooring bouy when coming into an anchorage at night. Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Technique for avoiding collision with floating debris......
From: "Tom Dacon" This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range can commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. In fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. Well, as long as you stay in "calm waters" it looks like you'll be OK. :-) Capt. Bill |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Technique for avoiding collision with floating debris......
From: "Tom Dacon" This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range can commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. In fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. Well, as long as you stay in "calm waters" it looks like you'll be OK. :-) Capt. Bill |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. A debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off any radar collision alarm.. This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range can commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. In fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. Tom Dacon |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm afraid the human eye ball is about the only thing that can keep you from
running into floating debris.. The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. A debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off any radar collision alarm.. Keep a good watch and have a stout boat.. Failing that, have a collision mat in the emergency locker (along with a plan on how to use it). -- My opinion and experience. FWIW Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Avoidance strategies might reduce the odds of collision somewhat, but not enough to
consider the risk eliminated. Radar, for instance, might work in some conditions, but not all. This leaves two approaches: one, which has been discussed, is preparing to handle the damage efficiently. I'd be curious what percentage of collision damages event can be handled with a collision mat, and how many required abandoning ship. Clearly, when the damage is too severe, most vessels will sink like the proverbial stone, but there are certain levels of damage where a mat will save the day. The third approach is to reduce the odds of the vessel sinking, with positive floatation and/or collision bulkheads. Multihulls have an advantage, since they don't have the dead weight of the keel, and the hulls are shaped to facilitate flotation chambers. But any relatively light vessel can be made reasonably unsinkable. One can make a case that floatation bags are a better investment than a liferaft. -- -jeff www.sv-loki.com "The sea was angry that day, my friend. Like an old man trying to send back soup at the deli." "Courtney Thomas" wrote in message ... Is there an electronic strategy with alarms to avoid collision with floating objects while sailing ? A full description would be appreciated. Thank you. -- Courtney Thomas s/v Mutiny lying Oriental, NC WDB5619 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|