Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
See the Long Beach diagram page
http://www.lbwater.org/pdf/lb_graphic.pdf This uses 2 pressure stages and nanofiltration not reverse osmosis membranes - 525 psi and 250 psi - much less energy per gallon. Any marine watermaker development in this direction? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The principle has been around for a while but it is not cost effective
except in very large scale plants. In RO the TDS rejection rate is fairly stable and the volume of product flow varies with pressure. In nanofiltration salinity of the product water is directly related to pressure so very precise regulation is required. Also, RO is self cleaning because the flow of the brine is parallel to the membrane surface while nanofilters force brine directly against the fliter so they have to be brought off line for maintenance on a regular basis. Nanofiltration would be cost effective for a municipal water system or maybe an aircraft carrier where personel are available for operation and maintenance but RO is more practical on a yacht. Panama wrote: See the Long Beach diagram page http://www.lbwater.org/pdf/lb_graphic.pdf This uses 2 pressure stages and nanofiltration not reverse osmosis membranes - 525 psi and 250 psi - much less energy per gallon. Any marine watermaker development in this direction? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The principle has been around for a while but it is not cost effective
except in very large scale plants. In RO the TDS rejection rate is fairly stable and the volume of product flow varies with pressure. In nanofiltration salinity of the product water is directly related to pressure so very precise regulation is required. Also, RO is self cleaning because the flow of the brine is parallel to the membrane surface while nanofilters force brine directly against the fliter so they have to be brought off line for maintenance on a regular basis. Nanofiltration would be cost effective for a municipal water system or maybe an aircraft carrier where personel are available for operation and maintenance but RO is more practical on a yacht. Panama wrote: See the Long Beach diagram page http://www.lbwater.org/pdf/lb_graphic.pdf This uses 2 pressure stages and nanofiltration not reverse osmosis membranes - 525 psi and 250 psi - much less energy per gallon. Any marine watermaker development in this direction? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|