Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harlan Lachman" wrote Roger, I don't remember who it was who responded to me, but his point, expressed more succinctly and powerfully than my summation was that it was irresponsible to boat off the coast of Maine in a fog and hope others spent the money and developed the expertise to prevent accidents. Actually, what is irresponsible, according to the rules of the road and centuries of common law, is proceeding at a speed that will not allow you to stop in half of your visibility. Radar, which is only an aid to navigation, lets people do this at a lower level of anxiety so they do. It has not yet been established that radar is a substitute for visibility but law and reality diverge as is usually the case. Even in Maine, I have seldom seen it so thick that I could not do a complete U turn at normal speed in half my visibility. I'm out in the open cockpit where my vision and hearing are not attenuated by a pilothouse. Operating without radar, I'm actually technically responsible whereas the guy in his trawler yacht with all the bells and whistles over running his stopping and maneuvering distance by three or four times is not. GPS, of course, has made the situation much worse. Lots of people out there following the little cursor around and full speed. How many of them do you think actually know how to use the radar in a way that would let them correctly analyze and respond to a crossing situation? Paradoxically, as vessels get larger and safer for their occupants, they become more of a hazard to others. I'd certainly agree with you from the vantage point of a larger, faster, heavier, and less maneuverable boat but I don't present much of a hazard to other boats likely to be out there. Any irresponsibility issue arises out of hazard to my passengers and possibility of needing rescue from the many who are being technically and actually irresponsible by using navigational aids to proceed with too much speed and too little look out. I have a radar reflector, they should see me. Practically, radar is of much more limited use on a sailboat than a powerboat. Proper use requires constant plotting and tracking. That would put me down below relying on a generally inexperienced guest to take the helm and lookout. Sure, it would tell me that other boats are out there but I generally know that because I hear them. There are fogs and there are fogs. Visibility is usually a lot better than it seems. There are days, times, and places, where I wouldn't go; just as there are weather conditions that would keep me anchored or tied up. The mere operation of a boat in restricted visibility is not, by itself, irresponsible. Sure, there is a level of risk, and that level of risk would be lower if in installed radar. The argument that someone is irresponsible simply because there is a an available way to lessen risk is spurious. At any level of vessel size and complexity there will always be more equipment and more safety that you can build in. The ocean is a dangerous place and yachting is optional so, by that standard, just being a cruiser is irresponsible. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Commodores Meanderings | General | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Trip Report - Little Tupper Time | Touring |