![]() |
Sails
Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it
necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon |
Sails
"Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Essie has a Profurl NC32 furler, Genoa built by North Sails. No foam or other "bulker" in the luff, works just fine. YMMV. |
Sails
"Gordon" wrote in message
... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Sails
On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe |
Sails
"Joe" wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe I agree. Anybody installing roll-ups on a 27-footer is a weenie! Total waste of money, a source of extra trouble and breakdowns, decreased performance, ugly-looking and expensive. Only fools pay extra for less. Wilbur Hubbard |
Sails
The shape of my 130 with foam is bad enough when reefed down that I would
sure go with the foam. The size of the sail doesn't have that much to do with the geometry of the sail shape. I'm always astounded how well my boat sails with the working jib which has great shape. I put a luff doubling on it this winter so I can leave it up and fly it more often. Good shape trumps area in most conditions. -- Roger Long |
Sails
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... The shape of my 130 with foam is bad enough when reefed down that I would sure go with the foam. The size of the sail doesn't have that much to do with the geometry of the sail shape. I'm always astounded how well my boat sails with the working jib which has great shape. I put a luff doubling on it this winter so I can leave it up and fly it more often. Good shape trumps area in most conditions. -- Roger Long My 130 Genny is relatively flat-cut. That does certainly make a difference when reefing. If air is light enough that it wants shape, I should probably put the drifter up anyway. |
Sails
"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com... On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe Sorry dude, but I single-hand all the time. Hank on sails are fine when you don't have to reef often by yourself. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Sails
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:15:02 -0700, Gordon said: Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Might it not make a difference whether you're talking a 100% working jib or a 155% Jenny? It might. g -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Sails
Dave wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:49:53 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: I agree. Anybody installing roll-ups on a 27-footer is a weenie! One of Neal's defining characteristics is making a virtue of necessity. I'm not only a lazy weenie, but an OLD lazy weenie. Didn't we just have a thread about brains versus brawn? Gordon BTW Sail will be somewhere between 125 and 135%. |
Sails
On May 10, 5:56 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Joe" wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe Sorry dude, but I single-hand all the time. Hank on sails are fine when you don't have to reef often by yourself. -- "j" ganz - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - An inner and outer fore stay, 2 sail tracks on the main, and a mizzen and it's easy to keep ahead of the wind single handed with hank on sails. Auto pilots helps. Joe |
Sails
With a foan luff you will be able to reef down a full ~30% of what you
have and still have GOOD sail shape. 130 X .70 = 91% Without the foam, etc. luff you will only be able to reef down a few % and then the sail at the luff (entry shape) will become quite full/rounded; full/rounded is not what you want when you reef as full/rounded luff shape is to 'power up' a sail .... and you will heel more and point less as the increased 'roundness' of the luff shape essentially changes the sail's "angle of attack". Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon |
Sails
"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com... On May 10, 5:56 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Joe" wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe Sorry dude, but I single-hand all the time. Hank on sails are fine when you don't have to reef often by yourself. -- "j" ganz - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - An inner and outer fore stay, 2 sail tracks on the main, and a mizzen and it's easy to keep ahead of the wind single handed with hank on sails. Auto pilots helps. Joe Well good for you! I prefer the ease of pulling one line to roll up my sail. If you don't, don't feel you have to get one. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Sails
If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe Sorry dude, but I single-hand all the time. Hank on sails are fine when you don't have to reef often by yourself. I agree wholeheartedly. It took me years to change to a roller furler due to a number of reasons including thoughts of the thing malfunctioning in heavy weather and having to pull the whole sail out to get it down. A friend of mine who had circumnavigated solo in her 30 footer without an engine convinced me. It is safer being a single hander being able to reef etc from the cockpit, faster and much less effort. I'm not racing so why would any less than perfect sail set worry me? Peter |
Sails
Gordon wrote:
Dave wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:49:53 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: I agree. Anybody installing roll-ups on a 27-footer is a weenie! One of Neal's defining characteristics is making a virtue of necessity. I'm not only a lazy weenie, but an OLD lazy weenie. Didn't we just have a thread about brains versus brawn? Gordon BTW Sail will be somewhere between 125 and 135%. According to Larry, if you are OLD you shouldn't be out on a boat without a young able bodied seaman to do everything for you. |
Sails
"krj" wrote in message ... Gordon wrote: Dave wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:49:53 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: I agree. Anybody installing roll-ups on a 27-footer is a weenie! One of Neal's defining characteristics is making a virtue of necessity. I'm not only a lazy weenie, but an OLD lazy weenie. Didn't we just have a thread about brains versus brawn? Gordon BTW Sail will be somewhere between 125 and 135%. According to Larry, if you are OLD you shouldn't be out on a boat without a young able bodied seaman to do everything for you. I can dream about that, but there never any around when I want to go sailing Leanne |
Sails
"Leanne" wrote in :
I can dream about that, but there never any around when I want to go sailing Parris Island??....(c; NAS Beaufort??.....((c; Larry -- |
Sails
On May 10, 3:56 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Joe" wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 4:30 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? Thanks Gordon Necessary? No. Good idea? Maybe. Depends on the size of the jib to begin with. I have a 100% on a furler with no foam. Quantum built it for me from a jib that was for a furler that got replaced with a new one. If I reef the 100, the sail is no longer perfect, but it wasn't perfect anyway. g I've been considering a 130, and for that I would have them put the foam. -- "j" ganz If you bought proper hanked on sails you will not need rotting foam and other types of dunnage used to maintain a proper sail shape. Joe Sorry dude, but I single-hand all the time. Hank on sails are fine when you don't have to reef often by yourself. -- "j" ganz I've hanked on enough sails singlehanded to appreciate a good reefer/ furler. Far Cove has one, and it's a Joy to always have Just Enough headsail rather than always too much or too little. As for the foam luff: I think it's a Good Idea, and as mentioned does give you a better sail shape when reefed, but not necessary for reefing. Just make sure you get a GOOD furling system (mine is a Harken) - the cheaper ones furl but don't reef. druid http://www.bcboatnet.org |
Sails
In article .com,
druid wrote: I've hanked on enough sails singlehanded to appreciate a good reefer/ furler. Far Cove has one, and it's a Joy to always have Just Enough headsail rather than always too much or too little. As for the foam luff: I think it's a Good Idea, and as mentioned does give you a better sail shape when reefed, but not necessary for reefing. Just make sure you get a GOOD furling system (mine is a Harken) - the cheaper ones furl but don't reef. I have a Schaefer. Sailing with it reefed in 25kts plus isn't a problem. Definitely, you need a decent mechanism. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
Sails
On 2007-05-10 17:15:02 -0400, Gordon said:
Putting a profurl headsail roller reefer on a 27 footer. Is it necessary to have luff foam or rope for reefing on a sail this small? Some sailmakers say yes, some no. Any direct experiences? We have the rope luff on the 135 and it does seem to work better than foam after a couple of years' use. Either makes a furled sail's shape better, though not perfect. Our 110 doesn't have either, though. When the weather's too high for that and a double-reefed main, I'm gonna either be in the anchorage or on the way, in weather too rough to point much anyway, and I'll be minimizing heel and wanting the power. Your mileage will definitely vary as each boat differs. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com