Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And then I think it's fair to say, that if you use Raymarine/SeaTalk it is
(depite disadvantages of a propritary standard) extremely easy to interconnect and at absolutely no extra cost. So if you do; why not interconnect and get the extra features for free. And true wind is a must, unless you call yourself 'Wilbur Hubbard' and is satisfied with sloppy sailing and use your saved energy on being rude to people posting relevant questions. Bjarke wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 10, 11:38 pm, Larry wrote: wrote in news:1176244717.431800.16850 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: SNIP The coordinated turns in any REASONABLE wind/current/speed situation is so smooth....no overshoot or undershoot....Ghosts don't oversteer..(c; Larry -- Larry Many thanks for your info. Matt |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This past winter I thought it would be a great time to upgrade my
dated sailing instruments. I spent many hours researching all the vendors, and in the end I went with Raymarine. I was so impressed with the ease of self installation and setup, that I ordered a new C80, GPS, and Wheel pilot the same night. My "old" (2006) GPS unit is still in perfect working condition, and I am using it as a backup now. I was worried about the Seatalk standard at the start, however, I am a absolutley impressed with the whole system. With the C80, and the autopilot the both offer NMEA out which will broadcast many of the Seatalk (not all) sentences to other on board equipment. Although the instuments cost a bit more than others up front you are getting a well engineered product, that you should not have to fuss with. Mike |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mlkress" wrote in news:1176468858.686885.36230
@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: I was worried about the Seatalk standard at the start, however, I am a absolutley impressed with the whole system. I'd just wish they'd drop the wired serial bus nonsense and go BLUETOOTH with everything on the boat! It's time everything was WIRELESS, even the sensors in the bilge! The speed log Bluetooth pairs with the log transducer. The radar scanner Bluetooth pairs with the radome for video and control. Same with all the rest....(c; Larry -- |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As long as they produce wired instruments for me, then it's fine with me if
you want all the problems with bluetooth. Bjarke "Larry" wrote in message ... "mlkress" wrote in news:1176468858.686885.36230 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: I was worried about the Seatalk standard at the start, however, I am a absolutley impressed with the whole system. I'd just wish they'd drop the wired serial bus nonsense and go BLUETOOTH with everything on the boat! It's time everything was WIRELESS, even the sensors in the bilge! The speed log Bluetooth pairs with the log transducer. The radar scanner Bluetooth pairs with the radome for video and control. Same with all the rest....(c; Larry -- |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bjarke M. Christensen" bjarkeNG@grevestrand_punktum_danmark wrote in
message k... As long as they produce wired instruments for me, then it's fine with me if you want all the problems with bluetooth. What problems with bluetooth? Meindert |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That my ear-device for my telephone contantly get confused and that my
f...... bluetooth keybord and mouse has to be re-installed every time I replace the battery. I wish I'd opted for the IR version or cable .... I btw pulled the wires for my new ST60 log and depth instruments today. 3 hours work and for the next 10 years I know they will *always* be in contact ..... I if they were bluetooth I would have used 2 hours on 12 volt wires anway. Great investment ... Bjarke "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ll.nl... "Bjarke M. Christensen" bjarkeNG@grevestrand_punktum_danmark wrote in message k... As long as they produce wired instruments for me, then it's fine with me if you want all the problems with bluetooth. What problems with bluetooth? Meindert |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That my ear-device for my telephone contantly get confused and that my
f...... bluetooth keybord and mouse has to be re-installed every time I replace the battery. I wish I'd opted for the IR version or cable .... I btw pulled the wires for my new ST60 log and depth instruments today. 3 hours work and for the next 10 years I know they will *always* be in contact .... I if they were bluetooth I would have used 2 hours on 12 volt wires anway. Great investment ... What he said. Unless there's already power available you're still going to have to run wire. NMEA2000 supports powering devices from the network so it's only one cable to pull. I've got two fuel flow sensors and a GPS antenna off mine. Likewise, I've found the reprogramming madness of bluetooth devices to be more trouble than it's worth. I'd hate to imagine the hassles of reprogramming something at sea, under bad conditions, trying to find the batteries and the manual. No thanks. Wireless has it's place but other than for secondary displays or perhaps remote control I don't see using it on most boats. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bjarke M. Christensen" bjarkeNG@grevestrand_punktum_danmark wrote in
message k... That my ear-device for my telephone contantly get confused and that my f...... bluetooth keybord and mouse has to be re-installed every time I replace the battery. I wish I'd opted for the IR version or cable .... Those are typical examples of bad design to save money, resulting in bad reputation of the technology. The same has happened with USB. Both technologies allow for beautiful solutions when done right from the start. Of course I am biased, since I have designed bluetooth and USB enabled multiplexers that do work properly :-) I have had customers buy a multiplexer with a serial interface (resulting in the infamous "crazy mouse" problem in Windows) because they were reluctant to buy one with a USB interface. And it is precisely the one with USB interface that does NOT have this crazy mouse problem and always works, like PnP/USB was supposed to work. The same with bluetooth: by using better modules than cheap consumer stuff, pairing info is stored permanently and every time the system is brought up, the communication is there as if a serial cable was attached. But the cheap consumer stuff is stripped down to the bare necessities, and to save another 50c on cost, the non-volatile memory chip needed to store this sort of info is omitted. A similar problem exists with USB devices, by omitting a tiny chip with a unique serial number, windows can only recognize a cheap usb-serial converter by the USB port is is plugged in, resulting in a different com port number when you plug it in a different USB port. By adding this little chip, such a converter would have the same com port number, no matter which USB port on your PC you plug it into. Meindert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Summer at the beach near Seattle video... | General | |||
Cheap navigation system | ASA | |||
A question about NMEA, AIS and Raymarine | Electronics | |||
NMEA: What confusion is that? | Electronics | |||
Connect Raymarine ST60 Multi to laptop | Electronics |