Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking for opinions on attaching the autopilot's ram bracket to the hull.
Our boat consists of about 9/16" outer FRP, then 1" of foam, then about 1/4" FRP in the area to receive the bracket. The ram can produce about 1500 foot pounds of force. The boat is 47' full keel, 23 tons. Thanks, Doug |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
This is a time when I bet you wish the hull was steel. You certainly do have an issue and it is clear that bonding to the inner FRP skin won't cut it. My advice would be to use an aluminum mount made out of bars of 1" wide 5/16" thick spaced at 1" to 1.250 ". these verticle bars should be welded to a horizontal plate or a pair of horizontal plates that will accept the cylinder. The inner skin and foam should be removed and this assembly should occupy at least 1 square foot of area possibly more. Bond the aluminum assembly to the outer hull and fiberglass the mount in place out to the inner hull position. Steve "Doug Siddens" wrote in message news ![]() Looking for opinions on attaching the autopilot's ram bracket to the hull. Our boat consists of about 9/16" outer FRP, then 1" of foam, then about 1/4" FRP in the area to receive the bracket. The ram can produce about 1500 foot pounds of force. The boat is 47' full keel, 23 tons. Thanks, Doug |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Lusardi" wrote (some really, really, bad structural advice) It's important in engineering something like this to consider the inevitible flexing that takes place with concentrated loads. Discontinuities and changes in materials, expecially of different stiffnesses, are trouble. I can't think of anything much worse than introducing an interruption of the inner skin. Any micro cracking around the aluminum in this arrangement will let water into the core. This is something that needs to be designed for deflection rather than strength. Think of a too tight jackstand pushing in the side of your hull. It's in no danger of breaking but you wouldn't want your autopilot ram to be doing that. I would not want you to build something this critical according the these ideas without further advice from someone familiar with fiberglasss boat design who can look at the actual installation but I think a solution should include elements like these: Drill the smallest holes in the inner core that will let you remove core with an "L" shaped piece of wire chucked into a drill and a shop vac. Pack these voids with chopped mat and resin to tie the skins together. Do this for about a foot around the attachment point and then put a layer or two of glass over the whole area. Much depends on how close existing stiffening such as bulkheads are to the ram attachment point. If the hull is fairly stiff due to other structure, a large pad for the ram may be suffiicient. Find out the tensile strength of the epoxy bond to the hull and divide by about 4. Divide the maximum force the ram can exert by this number and you will need that many square inches of pad for bonding. You need to give some careful thought to the rudder stops. Will the ram limits now become the rudder stops? If so, the rudder could put still larger loads on the ram, especially in a grounding. If the rudder can hit the stops, they need to be able to accept the full strength of the ram in case the autopilot gets into a mode where it thinks it needs to be hard over. This could be through a control failure. If the area of hull where the ram is going to go is unsupported for a long distance, consider a web frame of glass covered plywood a few inches deep on each side of the ram running up and down as far as possible. The ends should land on other structure or be gradually tapered. Put one of these on each side of the attachement point and then mount the ram on a header running between them. Here is a way you can evaluate your hull stiffness without engineering: Install the ram against a temporary mount glued to the hull. Rig up a way to pump oil into it with a hand pump, (a high pressure grease gun might do) and a gauge. Piston area times PSI - force. Fasten a timber from the rail to the ground and rig a dial gauge on it touching the hull. Record some force and deflection readings and plot them on a graph. Run a line out from zero through the points untill it reaches 1500 pounds, or whatever maximum ram force is, (remember that rudder force could be greater if the ram becomes the rudder stop). If predicted deflection is fairly minimal, you probably don't need much additional stiffening. This sounds like an involved operation but hiring and engineer can be expensive too. Whatever you do with a point load like this, think about keeping all structural members and transitions tapered. Visualize the whole thing as if it was flexed and distorted way out of shape and look for areas where things would bend sharply or loads would be concentrated. Designing things to flex properly is often more important than strength. -- Roger Long |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Raymarine Autopilot does not handle my a-spinnaker | Electronics | |||
Garmins and autopilot interfaces | Electronics | |||
Raymarine autopilot problem | Electronics | |||
Autopilot fails on Raytheon ST5000+ with "No Data" error | Cruising | |||
Autopilot fails on Raytheon ST5000+ with "No Data" error | Electronics |