Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:54:01 -0400, Jeff wrote: * Wayne.B wrote, On 3/24/2007 5:15 PM: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:02:58 -0400, Jeff wrote: Although I like Micron Extra, at $225/gal, its gotten too pricey. Compared to the price of haulouts and bottom painting, it's a bargain. I normally put a coat on every year. Last year I skipped to see what would happen, and to let some of the accumulation ablate off. The results were mixed - by the end of the second season I had fair number of barnacles - much more than when I went 12 months mainly in Florida. So for my area, I can't call it "two season." My catamaran takes 2 gallons, so that's $450. And since I haul each winter, there's nothing saved in that regard. As for Practical Sailor's occasional dubious techniques, I've seen that from just about every testing group that actually tells us how they test. Although I don't always follow their recommendations, I can't remember a time that I've been disappointed by their advice. And there simply isn't anyone else doing tests, so for better or worse, they/re the best. In the case of the CPP, it was rated "good" for northern waters, while Micron was just "fair," so for half the price, its worth a try. I feel your trust in PS is misplaced. They don't just do unscientific testing, but they are totally capricious as far as their recommendations. Bottom paint has traditionally been one of their most egrarious screwups. One year about 3 years ago, they tested all of the paints by the usual dubious methods. They then proceeded to give the TOP rating to a paint that hadn't done as well as one of the others, and stated it was simply because they "had always liked it, and it was a long time favorite". That's about as unethical as you can get. When talking about Practical Sailor's tests and evaluations, I don't think "garbage " is too strong. I DO hope you have good luck with that CPP, but as everyone knows, there is no free lunch. If Pettit has a similar, but name-brand paint for more money, you really need to know why they would make a cheaper product for West Marine to compete against their own sauce. The recent price hike of Micron Extra is mostly due to the soaring price of COPPER. CWM Take a bathroom scale into the paint store. Weigh the different brands gallon size. The one that weighs the most is the best, most long-lasting paint. It's all bout the copper content. You buy inexpensive paint, you get less copper. It doesn't take a rocket scientist. Same thing with lead acid batteries. Weigh them. The heaviest one has the most lead is the best battery. Simple, simple, simple. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/24/2007 7:12 PM:
.... Take a bathroom scale into the paint store. Weigh the different brands gallon size. The one that weighs the most is the best, most long-lasting paint. It's all bout the copper content. You buy inexpensive paint, you get less copper. It doesn't take a rocket scientist. Same thing with lead acid batteries. Weigh them. The heaviest one has the most lead is the best battery. Simple, simple, simple. Dumb, dumb, dumb. All of the ablatives have about the same copper (or cuprous oxide) content - ranging between 37% and 42%. The hard paints vary more. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bottom paint choice? | Cruising | |||
Bottom Paint Question ,, on prep, type, application | Cruising | |||
Bottom Growth Question | ASA | |||
Getting to the bottom of it... (Ablative question) | Boat Building | |||
Bottom Paint | ASA |