![]() |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "Gogarty" wrote in message ... In article . net, says... Absolutely. My father was fond of saying: "This isn't a dress rehearsal." His point being that one lives life or one does not. You can't take your money with you, and I sure as hell have no great desire to pass it one to my kid and screw her up. We initially thought of naming our boat "SOCI" with a sedilla on the C. But we thought it might be unncessarily provocative. Short for Spending Our Children's Inheritance. I've seen similar names, such as "Our Kids' Inheritance" and "Leaving Nothing Behind for the Kids." The last one is a puzzlement--can you imagine calling that in when asking for a slip? Max Asking for a slip? And that alone doesn't embarrass you? Not in the least. My wife and I prefer to anchor whenever we can. Some places we choose to visit don't have anchorages, and occasionally we have people aboard who have different preferences and requirements than ours. We make every attempt to accommodate our passengers/friends. Begging to pay big bucks to tie up to two piles and a pier squeezed in among other losers while having your boat attacked by stray electricity, In over 40 years of boating, I have yet to experience anything resembling enough stray electricity to affect any more harm to my boat than a slight degradation of my sacrificial zincs. water polluted with sewage and fuel and oil, Not in the Great Lakes. I'm sorry if you must sail such waters. subjected to roaches, noise, fumes, rats, cats and dogs ****ing on your lines. Never in 40 years. The very least of your worries is how stupid the name of your boat is, I should think. Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Why on earth would you pay money to support any operation that treats you like scum and charges an arm and a leg for it. Ya gotta be a masochist. We've done the mooring bit, and of course we anchor far more often than take transient slips when cruising. But we enjoy the camaraderie of a slip in our home port. Most of the people on the dock are close friends. We party with them, we sail with them, or take them sailing with us. We dine with them, and have pleasant evenings with them while chatting and watching the sun set off the end of our dock, all while loners and antisocial types hang on their moorings in solitude, wondering what all the laughter from our dock is about. Each to his own. Of course I realize you'd prefer a world in which everyone thought exactly as you do, but that might be a world in which most of us would prefer not to live. Max |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Sounds like someone who'd own a talking horse. Max |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Beats the hell outta Lauri. In your wildest dreams. Lauri is a sexy name. Wilbur is . . . . . . um, Wilbur. Neal is for nerds. Max |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Mar 22, 10:25 pm, "Maxprop" wrote:
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Beats the hell outta Lauri. In your wildest dreams. Lauri is a sexy name. Wilbur is . . . . . . um, Wilbur. Neal is for nerds. Max Now Max behave...you're going to make Lauri blush. Joe Joe |
The average boat owning idiot.
Real sailors, on the other hand, live aboard and travel from place
to place and anchor out every night of the year. Hell with that. I'd rather do a race and go home to my nice air- condition house and get horizontal on my sofa and watch my 50" LCD projection TV. |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Dave" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:08:19 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Mahommed Panaeyotis Hendra Make fun of these It's not overly difficult to make fun of somebody who can't even spell Mohammad correctly . . . Ah, and there we have in a nutshell Neal's problem--a total inability to think outside his narrow little box. When you name a kid, there is no such thing as spelling the name "correctly." You spell the name however you damn well please and that's the kid's name. So what if one is spelled John and another Jon? And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). Wilbur Hubbard You are wrong moron. As the Koran - or more correctly transliterated from the arabic - Q'uran - is written in arabic, there are several accepted spellings. |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:05:24 -0400, "mr.b" wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. Upon thinking about it, I can't recall anyone outside the USA with the name that the miniomaniac uses as a pseudonym. Where did it originate apart from the talking horse tv show? |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:08:11 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "mr.b" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. Yah. T'was but a joke, son. The idea being...oh bugger it. ;-) Are you an "Asterix" fan - Gosginny and Udzero? Peter H |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:28:11 -0400, Jeff wrote:
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:48 PM: "Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 2:10 PM: And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). How then do you know the English spelling of Mohamed, as there is no English version of the Qur'an? Google it, silly boy! Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful Peter H |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:11:08 -0400, Jeff wrote:
* Peter Hendra wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:03 AM: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful This is the first I had heard of that. I don't know if its specifically British, or new political correctness. Of course, a newspaper style guide is likely to be responsive to a vocal minority, so its not clear what the meaning of "many" is. http://www.guardian.co.uk/styleguide...184829,00.html Muhammad Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of God's prophets, who delivered God's final message. They recognise Moses and Jesus as prophets also. The above transliteration is our style for the prophet's name and for most Muhammads living in Arab countries, though where someone's preferred spelling is known we respect it, eg Mohamed Al Fayed, Mohamed ElBaradei. The spelling Mohammed (or variants) is considered archaic by most British Muslims today, and disrespectful by many of them i don't know how many Moslems there are in Britain and it really doesn't matter but there are 230 million in Indonesia where I sometimes work, and over 11 million in Malaysia, who most likely have never heard of the Guardian (no disrespect intended) and who would smile politely at that statement and be amused that people would spend time on such irrelevancies. There is a centuries old Sufi story my grandfather once told me (of many). Please bear with me. 'With reference to the Guardian report" A man, lost in dense forest amongst steep mountains, stumbled into a hidden valley and came across a small village where he was made welcome and given food, drink and a bed for the night. He noticed that the meat and other food he had been so generously given was uncooked and discovered to his amazement that the villagers did not use or even know anything about fire. To repay his hosts he showed them how to kindle fire by rubbing two sticks together, one a hardwood, the other soft. He then showed them how to cook their meat, rendering it tastier and easier to chew. he taught them bread making, how to harden their spear points in the fire and that they did not need to go to bed with sunset but could sit about, sew, talk, tell stories to the young (it was before the invention of television) and even illustrate Book IV of Plato's Republic with shadows on the wall from the light oif the fire (He was a well read man). Several centuries later, another traveller came across the valley and found that there were three villages in place of the original one. Those in the first worshiped a single eternal flame, praying to it and leaving offerings in the small temple sheltering it. A dedicated priesthood ensured that the flame never went out and none but the initiated came near it. They used the fire for nothing else as it was too sacred for such profanities as cooking. The second village, about which he had been warned to be a nest of heretics, did not worship the fire. Instead, they worshiped the memory of the man who had taught them to make it. They held in reverence a sacred book that told of his deeds and contained many of his sayings. They never used fire at all, no longer knew how to make it or what it could be used for. The priests warned him as he was leaving of the last village. They were a damned people and he had best avoid contact with them. At the last village on his way through the valley, the traveller found that the inhabitants neither worshiped the fire nor the man who introduced it. They merely used it for cooking, heating, light and all the myriad uses that it could be put to. The point, or the message is.........? Less I be flamed for plagarism, I would point out that the originator of this story is unknown. My grandfather was from Crete. This and many like it are told between Greece and India, especially in those countries once dominated by the Turkish empire. Peter |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:09:27 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Dave" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:28:11 -0400, Jeff said: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Now there you go confusing things for poor Wilbur, Jeff. He likes everything to be simple, with only one "right" answer--the one he thinks is right. Ambiguities like those you suggest will drive him to distraction. No, I just consider the source. It's more to do with inference than ambiguities. What Jeff infers is often a non sequitur. As the premises spring from the source and the source is suspect then premise equals moot point as concerns being driven to distraction. Simple unassailable logic. Wilbur Hubbard Ever heard of Dicken's "Mrs Malaprop"? Your use of the above terms clearly illustrates the term "malapropism" and reveals your obvious lack of a reasonable education. Pedantism is not an enviable profession Peter |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:50:24 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "Peter Hendra" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:08:11 -0600, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "mr.b" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. Yah. T'was but a joke, son. The idea being...oh bugger it. ;-) Are you an "Asterix" fan - Gosginny and Udzero? Peter H Wasn't before, perhaps now. It was the Latin quote that brought it to mind - no I never "did" Latin. I am not sure if they are obtainable in the States, but they are an excellent set of "comic" books describing the adventures of the main hero "Asterix" and the other villagers of a small group of "indomitable Gauls" holding out against the might of Caesar's Legions. Originally written as an educational series for French children, they have been translated into many, many languages since. They are certainly not only for children. People of all ages are fans. The molre you know, the more you will get from them. Many of the names and much of the conversation are Latin puns. My sister learned Latin at school and gets far more out of them than I do. They are amongst our family's favourite books and are read by all of us over and over again. each time getting something new from them. The Druid "Getafix" brews a magic potion that gives the villagers superhuman strength which they use to "bash' the Roman troops. Most of the series are about the travels of Astewrix and Obelix - a menhir delivery man about the world. I know that if you read just one, you would be an addict forever. Try to get one. You will not regret it. cheers Peter |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:52:01 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "Jeff" wrote in message ... * Peter Hendra wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:03 AM: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful This is the first I had heard of that. I don't know if its specifically British, or new political correctness. Of course, a newspaper style guide is likely to be responsive to a vocal minority, so its not clear what the meaning of "many" is. http://www.guardian.co.uk/styleguide...184829,00.html Muhammad Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of God's prophets, who delivered God's final message. They recognise Moses and Jesus as prophets also. The above transliteration is our style for the prophet's name and for most Muhammads living in Arab countries, though where someone's preferred spelling is known we respect it, eg Mohamed Al Fayed, Mohamed ElBaradei. The spelling Mohammed (or variants) is considered archaic by most British Muslims today, and disrespectful by many of them Yeah, like there was a Jewish boy running around the Middle East named "Jesus." It ain't even close to being phonetically correct. Yes KLC, He was a Jewish boy. for his entire life, he was never a Christian. I was always confused as a kid by the many pictures of Jesus (we refer to him as Isus ibn Mariam - the last often is spelled with a "y"). He was usually portrayed as having blonde hair, fair skin and bright blue eyes. His outstretched hands were never calloused like other carpenters. I'll bet you didn't know that he is also the Moslem Messiah. .. cheers Peter |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:07:10 -0400, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:00:12 +1100, Peter Hendra wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:09:27 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:28:11 -0400, Jeff said: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Now there you go confusing things for poor Wilbur, Jeff. He likes everything to be simple, with only one "right" answer--the one he thinks is right. Ambiguities like those you suggest will drive him to distraction. No, I just consider the source. It's more to do with inference than ambiguities. What Jeff infers is often a non sequitur. As the premises spring from the source and the source is suspect then premise equals moot point as concerns being driven to distraction. Simple unassailable logic. Wilbur Hubbard Ever heard of Dicken's "Mrs Malaprop"? Your use of the above terms clearly illustrates the term "malapropism" and reveals your obvious lack of a reasonable education. Pedantism is not an enviable profession Peter Actually, that was, "The Rivals", by Richard Sheridan. CWM My God!!! You are right. I now stand as a self acknowledged imbecile thanks Peter |
The average boat owning idiot.
Maxprop wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Sounds like someone who'd own a talking horse. Max Hey...Tennessee Walkers are cool horses and if I had a horse down here I would be tempted..with all this flat land seems the most efficient thing and they can rack ...ever sat a rack...it's really weird... |
The average boat owning idiot.
Scotty wrote:
"Ringmaster" wrote in message oups.com.. . Real sailors, on the other hand, live aboard and travel from place to place and anchor out every night of the year. Hell with that. I'd rather do a race and go home to my nice air- condition house and get horizontal on my sofa and watch my 50" LCD projection TV. So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Ringmaster" wrote in message oups.com.. .. Real sailors, on the other hand, live aboard and travel from place to place and anchor out every night of the year. Hell with that. I'd rather do a race and go home to my nice air- condition house and get horizontal on my sofa and watch my 50" LCD projection TV. So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty |
The average boat owning idiot.
Scotty wrote:
"katy" wrote in projection TV. So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if we bathed? together? With Ringmaster? His wife might not like that... |
The average boat owning idiot.
"katy" wrote in projection TV. So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if we bathed? together? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:19:03 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Beats the hell outta Lauri. Wilbur Hubbard Your ignorance and indefendable rudeness is appalling. You obviously have never travelled overseas or come into contact with any cultures other than your own. You are the epitome of the ugly American who knows nothing of the world apart from his own immediate surroundings and judges other cultures by his own narrow and extremely limited view. I thank God that your type generally stay at home. To make fun of another person's name (who you have never met) which is unfamiliar to your ears is childish and rather churlish to say the least. If nothing else, it reveals your true nature as a pathetic, insignificant little man who I can readily imagine would never have the courage to verbalise in person the trite frass which he so bravely pens to the web. I would imagine that Lauri is more of a man than even you claim to be. The North Sea is not a place for wimps. I can well imagine that you are short in stature as well as in mind as you display and reveal to the world obvious symptoms of "short man's disease" Get a life Besides, just how manly is your pseudonym - "Wilbur" What has a Wilbur ever done? Mahommed Panaeyotis Hendra Make fun of these Captain Kneel's real name is Evelyn. |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... Mahommed Panaeyotis Hendra Make fun of these It's not overly difficult to make fun of somebody who can't even spell Mohammad correctly . . . Wilbur Hubbard |
The average boat owning idiot.
katy wrote:
So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? Hey, now I know that Scotty baths every six months, whether he needs it or not! Cheers Marty |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
... katy wrote: So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? Hey, now I know that Scotty baths every six months, whether he needs it or not! Cheers Marty How do you know? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:08:19 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Mahommed Panaeyotis Hendra Make fun of these It's not overly difficult to make fun of somebody who can't even spell Mohammad correctly . . . Ah, and there we have in a nutshell Neal's problem--a total inability to think outside his narrow little box. When you name a kid, there is no such thing as spelling the name "correctly." You spell the name however you damn well please and that's the kid's name. So what if one is spelled John and another Jon? And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). Wilbur Hubbard |
The average boat owning idiot.
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 2:10 PM:
And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). How then do you know the English spelling of Mohamed, as there is no English version of the Qur'an? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 2:10 PM: And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). How then do you know the English spelling of Mohamed, as there is no English version of the Qur'an? Google it, silly boy! Wilbur Hubbard |
The average boat owning idiot.
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:48 PM:
"Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/23/2007 2:10 PM: And, there in a nutshell is Dave's self-centered myopia. He has an ingrained, liberal inability to see that societal prejudice exists and how kids with weird names or misspelled names are the victims of disrespect, taunting, bullying etc. Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. If any Christian or Islamic name is used it should be spelled as it is in the Bible or Koran. I pity a kid with the name Mahommed should the radical Islamic Fascists take over. Such kids will be among the very first to have their heads severed from their bodies for blaspheming the Prophet Mohammad. Then they'll come after the parent(s) who visited the abomination upon the world (and might I add, rightly so). How then do you know the English spelling of Mohamed, as there is no English version of the Qur'an? Google it, silly boy! Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. |
The average boat owning idiot.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. |
The average boat owning idiot.
"mr.b" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. Yah. T'was but a joke, son. The idea being...oh bugger it. ;-) |
The average boat owning idiot.
"katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:39:07 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Real sailors anchor or moor out and take a dinghy to shore. Real sailors are not named Wilbur. It has an un-manly sound to it. Sounds like someone who'd own a talking horse. Max Hey...Tennessee Walkers are cool horses and if I had a horse down here I would be tempted..with all this flat land seems the most efficient thing and they can rack ...ever sat a rack...it's really weird... I said "talking," not *walking.* g Max |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... katy wrote: So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? Hey, now I know that Scotty baths every six months, whether he needs it or not! Cheers Marty How do you know? Jealous? Max |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:28:11 -0400, Jeff said: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Now there you go confusing things for poor Wilbur, Jeff. He likes everything to be simple, with only one "right" answer--the one he thinks is right. Ambiguities like those you suggest will drive him to distraction. No, I just consider the source. It's more to do with inference than ambiguities. What Jeff infers is often a non sequitur. As the premises spring from the source and the source is suspect then premise equals moot point as concerns being driven to distraction. Simple unassailable logic. Wilbur Hubbard |
The average boat owning idiot.
* Peter Hendra wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:03 AM:
Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful This is the first I had heard of that. I don't know if its specifically British, or new political correctness. Of course, a newspaper style guide is likely to be responsive to a vocal minority, so its not clear what the meaning of "many" is. http://www.guardian.co.uk/styleguide...184829,00.html Muhammad Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of God's prophets, who delivered God's final message. They recognise Moses and Jesus as prophets also. The above transliteration is our style for the prophet's name and for most Muhammads living in Arab countries, though where someone's preferred spelling is known we respect it, eg Mohamed Al Fayed, Mohamed ElBaradei. The spelling Mohammed (or variants) is considered archaic by most British Muslims today, and disrespectful by many of them |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:08:11 -0600, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "mr.b" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:14:44 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:10:21 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Any responsible parent names his child with a good, solid, respectable conventionally spelled name. Q.E.D. So is that pronounced "Ked," or "Qwed"? quod erat demonstrandum you can look it up, but basically Wilbur's parents have been slurred. Yah. T'was but a joke, son. The idea being...oh bugger it. ;-) Are you an "Asterix" fan - Gosginny and Udzero? Peter H Wasn't before, perhaps now. |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Jeff" wrote in message . .. * Peter Hendra wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:03 AM: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful This is the first I had heard of that. I don't know if its specifically British, or new political correctness. Of course, a newspaper style guide is likely to be responsive to a vocal minority, so its not clear what the meaning of "many" is. http://www.guardian.co.uk/styleguide...184829,00.html Muhammad Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of God's prophets, who delivered God's final message. They recognise Moses and Jesus as prophets also. The above transliteration is our style for the prophet's name and for most Muhammads living in Arab countries, though where someone's preferred spelling is known we respect it, eg Mohamed Al Fayed, Mohamed ElBaradei. The spelling Mohammed (or variants) is considered archaic by most British Muslims today, and disrespectful by many of them Yeah, like there was a Jewish boy running around the Middle East named "Jesus." It ain't even close to being phonetically correct. |
The average boat owning idiot.
"katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "katy" wrote in projection TV. So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if we bathed? together? With Ringmaster will the 3 of us fit? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... katy wrote: So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? Hey, now I know that Scotty baths every six months, whether he needs it or not! you peeked? |
The average boat owning idiot.
"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... katy wrote: So would I, but you never invite me. Scotty Maybe if ypu bathed? Hey, now I know that Scotty baths every six months, whether he needs it or not! Cheers Marty How do you know? Jealous? No. I take at least one bath a month. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
The average boat owning idiot.
On 24 Mar 2007 16:30:50 -0700, "Tim" wrote:
On Mar 23, 4:28 am, Peter Hendra wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:52:01 -0600, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "Jeff" wrote in message ... * Peter Hendra wrote, On 3/23/2007 4:03 AM: Actually, that confirms my claim that there is no definitive spelling in English. The preferred English is now Muhammad, but there are many others and it is polite to follow whatever convention is used for a personal name. However, according to the Guardian style guide some Muslims find the traditional spelling "Mohammed" and varients to be archaic and disrepectful. Well, that may be so but there are a great deal of Moslems I have met with my spelling of my name in Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Oman and in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is the first I have heard of any spelling of the name to be disrespectful This is the first I had heard of that. I don't know if its specifically British, or new political correctness. Of course, a newspaper style guide is likely to be responsive to a vocal minority, so its not clear what the meaning of "many" is. http://www.guardian.co.uk/styleguide...184829,00.html Muhammad Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of God's prophets, who delivered God's final message. They recognise Moses and Jesus as prophets also. The above transliteration is our style for the prophet's name and for most Muhammads living in Arab countries, though where someone's preferred spelling is known we respect it, eg Mohamed Al Fayed, Mohamed ElBaradei. The spelling Mohammed (or variants) is considered archaic by most British Muslims today, and disrespectful by many of them Yeah, like there was a Jewish boy running around the Middle East named "Jesus." It ain't even close to being phonetically correct. Yes KLC, He was a Jewish boy. for his entire life, he was never a Christian. I was always confused as a kid by the many pictures of Jesus (we refer to him as Isus ibn Mariam - the last often is spelled with a "y"). He was usually portrayed as having blonde hair, fair skin and bright blue eyes. His outstretched hands were never calloused like other carpenters. I'll bet you didn't know that he is also the Moslem Messiah. . cheers Peter- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've never heard of him as a "Moslem Messiah" as far as I know, the Muslims, consider him a great teacher, but not the "onlybegotten Son of God" , and deffinately not on the same level as Mohammed. As this is not a Theology discussion group, I shan't elaborate too much but you are confusing the three mentioned people and roles. 1 Moslems belive that Jesus was a prophet of God as was Moses, and others. 2. When Jesus stated that he was the "Son of God", this is what any member of the Pharisees believed - that each was a son of God. Have you even wondered why Jesus was not brought before the Sanhedrin on charges of blasphemy because of that statement? 3. In the Koran, it clearly states that the Prophet Mohammed said - "there is no Mahdi (Messiah) save Isus ibn Mariam (Jesus, son of Mary)" I threw that to KLC but he refused to pick it up. cheers Peter Hendra |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com