OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM:

Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the
property. Four justices voted against. The five voting for were
appointed by Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by
Republican presidents.

Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a
while since we've had that!

John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford
December 19, 1975
Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986
Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988
David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990
Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Clinton August 10, 1993
Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994
Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006

Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by
Reagan;
Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon

So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled
by Democratic nominees.

You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been
revoked!


You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went
down.

Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy,
David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they
weren't liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now.

O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H.
Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote
that the majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate
influence and power in the political process, including large
corporations and development firms."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html
Go to the back of the class . . .

Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny
what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five
justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In
fact, as I showed, only two were.

And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were
Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority
were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one
Republican joined the Democrat traitors?

Wilbur Hubbard

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:22 PM:

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM:

Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the
property. Four justices voted against. The five voting for were
appointed by Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by
Republican presidents.

Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a
while since we've had that!

John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford
December 19, 1975
Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986
Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988
David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990
Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Clinton August 10, 1993
Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994
Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006

Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by Reagan;
Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon

So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled
by Democratic nominees.

You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been
revoked!


You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went down.

Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy,
David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they
weren't liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now.

O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H.
Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote
that the majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate
influence and power in the political process, including large
corporations and development firms."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html
Go to the back of the class . . .

Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny
what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five
justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In
fact, as I showed, only two were.

And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were
Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority
were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one
Republican joined the Democrat traitors?


Lets go over this again real slow, so that even the most ignorant
conservatives can follow it. Clearly, three of the majority were
Republicans appointees. The two who retired recently were, in fact,
both Republican nominees, and were dissenters.

The majority:
John Paul Stevens Ford December 19, 1975
Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988
David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton August 10, 1993
Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994

The dissenters:
Sandra Day O'Conner Reagan September 25, 1981
William Rehnquist Nixon January 7, 1972
Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986
Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991

BTW, one of the Clinton appointees replaced Blackmun, who was a Nixon
appointee. And Souter replaced Brennan, who was an Eisenhower
appointee. So the Supreme Court has been "republican" for a long time.

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, Wilbur Hubbard wrote:


And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were
Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority
were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one
Republican joined the Democrat traitors?

Geez Neal, you take a stupid pill? Ginsburg and Breyer have been the
*only* Democrat appointees in the past forty years. That "Liberal Court"
you whine about is a Republican invention.

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, Wilbur Hubbard wrote:


And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were
Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority
were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one
Republican joined the Democrat traitors?

Geez Neal, you take a stupid pill? Ginsburg and Breyer have been the
*only* Democrat appointees in the past forty years. That "Liberal
Court"
you whine about is a Republican invention.

But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or
three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh!

Wilbur Hubbard

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or
three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh!

Wilbur Hubbard

Yes.. you'd have no choice to be anything but a masturbator...
What self-respecting woman would step aboard that mustard yellow sailboat
with the purple interior?

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two
or three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh!

Wilbur Hubbard

Yes.. you'd have no choice to be anything but a masturbator...
What self-respecting woman would step aboard that mustard yellow
sailboat with the purple interior?


My Allied Seawind 32 has a white Awlgripped hull and blue cushions in
the cabin. Women are all the time clamoring for a ride. And a cruise in
my boat, too.

Wilbur Hubbard

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny
what you said!

===============================================


On January 26, a visibly flustered President Clinton addressed the public
in a White House press conference and issued a forceful denial:" I want to
say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going
to say this again. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss
Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These
allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American
people.

================================================== ================================


Or, you lie on tv to the entire world.


==============================
You were very explicit in claiming that the five
justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In
fact, as I showed, only two were.

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM:

Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the property.
Four justices voted against. The five voting for were appointed by
Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by Republican presidents.

Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a while
since we've had that!

John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford
December 19, 1975
Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986
Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988
David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990
Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton
August 10, 1993
Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994
Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006

Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by Reagan;
Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon

So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled by
Democratic nominees.

You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been
revoked!


You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went down.

Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, David
H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they weren't
liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now.

O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote that the
majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate influence
and power in the political process, including large corporations and
development firms."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html
Go to the back of the class . . .

Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny what
you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in
favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed,
only two were.

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

In article ,
Jeff wrote:
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM:

Go to the back of the class . . .

Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny
what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five
justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In
fact, as I showed, only two were.

Jeff, that's not fair. I know many Republicans who don't lie... well,
I know two who don't.

Neal is, well, Neal.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:08:48 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two
or
three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh!

The last redoubt of an idiot who's been exposed as such--claiming he
was
only trolling.

And what about the sub-idiots who were caught by a troll so masterful
they could not help themselves? What's their excuse? Only being gullible
to an extreme? Bwahahahahahah. I sure know how to have a half-dozen
liberals flopping around on deck at the same time. I'm better at it than
even Bobsprit was. Bobsprit was a liberal and he had an impossible task.
Trying to bait conservatives is impossible. Conservatives are much
smarter than liberals. They are used to liberal tricks. They know how to
deal with a liberal. Admit it. You clowns lost. I had you all jumping
through hoops Googling to prove something you had doubts about or you
wouldn'ta been spending the time Googling. It took me about ten seconds
to type an outrageous statement. It took you liberals about ten minutes
composing a reply. Can you say el dumbo? (a little Spanish lingo)

Wilbur Hubbard
(half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair)

OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

So I was one off.

Yeah. What significance is just one vote in a 5-4 decision anyway.

Gore g


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com