| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM: Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the property. Four justices voted against. The five voting for were appointed by Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by Republican presidents. Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a while since we've had that! John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford December 19, 1975 Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986 Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988 David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990 Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton August 10, 1993 Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994 Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006 Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by Reagan; Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled by Democratic nominees. You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been revoked! You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went down. Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they weren't liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now. O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote that the majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html Go to the back of the class . . . Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed, only two were. And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one Republican joined the Democrat traitors? Wilbur Hubbard |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:22 PM:
"Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM: Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the property. Four justices voted against. The five voting for were appointed by Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by Republican presidents. Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a while since we've had that! John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford December 19, 1975 Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986 Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988 David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990 Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton August 10, 1993 Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994 Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006 Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by Reagan; Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled by Democratic nominees. You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been revoked! You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went down. Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they weren't liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now. O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote that the majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html Go to the back of the class . . . Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed, only two were. And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one Republican joined the Democrat traitors? Lets go over this again real slow, so that even the most ignorant conservatives can follow it. Clearly, three of the majority were Republicans appointees. The two who retired recently were, in fact, both Republican nominees, and were dissenters. The majority: John Paul Stevens Ford December 19, 1975 Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988 David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton August 10, 1993 Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994 The dissenters: Sandra Day O'Conner Reagan September 25, 1981 William Rehnquist Nixon January 7, 1972 Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986 Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 BTW, one of the Clinton appointees replaced Blackmun, who was a Nixon appointee. And Souter replaced Brennan, who was an Eisenhower appointee. So the Supreme Court has been "republican" for a long time. |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one Republican joined the Democrat traitors? Geez Neal, you take a stupid pill? Ginsburg and Breyer have been the *only* Democrat appointees in the past forty years. That "Liberal Court" you whine about is a Republican invention. |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, Wilbur Hubbard wrote: And you showed wrong. Two that were involved and now are retired were Democrat appointees. That makes four out of the five in the majority were Democrat appointees. So I was one off. Can I help it if one Republican joined the Democrat traitors? Geez Neal, you take a stupid pill? Ginsburg and Breyer have been the *only* Democrat appointees in the past forty years. That "Liberal Court" you whine about is a Republican invention. But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh! Wilbur Hubbard |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh! Wilbur Hubbard Yes.. you'd have no choice to be anything but a masturbator... What self-respecting woman would step aboard that mustard yellow sailboat with the purple interior? |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh! Wilbur Hubbard Yes.. you'd have no choice to be anything but a masturbator... What self-respecting woman would step aboard that mustard yellow sailboat with the purple interior? My Allied Seawind 32 has a white Awlgripped hull and blue cushions in the cabin. Women are all the time clamoring for a ride. And a cruise in my boat, too. Wilbur Hubbard |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny
what you said! =============================================== On January 26, a visibly flustered President Clinton addressed the public in a White House press conference and issued a forceful denial:" I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. ================================================== ================================ Or, you lie on tv to the entire world. ============================== You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed, only two were. "Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM: Five liberal justices voted in favor of the right to take the property. Four justices voted against. The five voting for were appointed by Democrat Presidents. The four voting against by Republican presidents. Five Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats???? Its been a while since we've had that! John Roberts G.W. Bush September 29, 2005 John Paul Stevens Ford December 19, 1975 Antonin Scalia Reagan September 26, 1986 Anthony Kennedy Reagan February 18, 1988 David Souter G.H.W. Bush October 9, 1990 Clarence Thomas G.H.W. Bush October 23, 1991 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton August 10, 1993 Stephen Breyer Clinton August 3, 1994 Samuel Alito G.W. Bush January 31, 2006 Also, Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Conner, who was nominated by Reagan; Roberts replaced William Rehnquist, who was nominated by Nixon So its been a long long time since the Supreme Court was controlled by Democratic nominees. You just flunked basic American History. Your citizenship has been revoked! You don't even have the right group, bonehead! Here's how it went down. Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. If they weren't liberals to begin with they are recognized as liberals now. O'Connor was joined in her dissent by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They wrote that the majority had tilted in favor of those with "disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html Go to the back of the class . . . Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed, only two were. |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
In article ,
Jeff wrote: * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/13/2007 3:01 PM: Go to the back of the class . . . Just like a Republican. When you're caught in a lie, you just deny what you said! You were very explicit in claiming that the five justices in favor were all "appointed by Democrat Presidents." In fact, as I showed, only two were. Jeff, that's not fair. I know many Republicans who don't lie... well, I know two who don't. Neal is, well, Neal. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:08:48 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: But you've got to gimme lots of credit for being a master baiter! Two or three on one hook. Bwahahahahahahahahh! The last redoubt of an idiot who's been exposed as such--claiming he was only trolling. And what about the sub-idiots who were caught by a troll so masterful they could not help themselves? What's their excuse? Only being gullible to an extreme? Bwahahahahahah. I sure know how to have a half-dozen liberals flopping around on deck at the same time. I'm better at it than even Bobsprit was. Bobsprit was a liberal and he had an impossible task. Trying to bait conservatives is impossible. Conservatives are much smarter than liberals. They are used to liberal tricks. They know how to deal with a liberal. Admit it. You clowns lost. I had you all jumping through hoops Googling to prove something you had doubts about or you wouldn'ta been spending the time Googling. It took me about ten seconds to type an outrageous statement. It took you liberals about ten minutes composing a reply. Can you say el dumbo? (a little Spanish lingo) Wilbur Hubbard (half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair) |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:22:39 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: So I was one off. Yeah. What significance is just one vote in a 5-4 decision anyway. Gore g -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
In article ,
Gogarty wrote: Well, that certainly is a non sequitur. I think it's time for us all to start working on our boats. That's where I'm headed in about an hour... bilge pump replacement. g shifts to the "left" over time, with an occasional lurch to the "right." But some of these people have real personality problems regardless of their place on the political spectrum. Scalia is the leading example. And, the scary part is that he hunts with Cheney! -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
In article ,
Gogarty wrote: My Allied Seawind 32 has a white Awlgripped hull and blue cushions in the cabin. Women are all the time clamoring for a ride. And a cruise in my boat, too. Wilbur Hubbard At last! Back on topic. BS, but back on topic. He doesn't own a boat. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
OT -- Haliburton sees handwriting on the wall. Moves offshore.
"Gogarty" wrote in message
... In article , lid says... The bilge wasn't as dirty as I was expecting... went rather well. The old Rule 500 GPH got replaced with a 750. Interestingly, the 500 worked fine in manual mode, but the auto mechanism must have died. I have exactly the same problem. Manual is fine, auto does not work. Those things are not sealed as well as you think they should be. I was astonished at the amou8nt of crud inside the top where the lectrics are. Not cold out here... 70s/80s Today, getting there. But more freezing coming according to the forecast. So we will wait another week or so before getting water into the boat. I'm going to use the new "spare" for a water-feature pump at the house. g -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com