Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year
and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
I just installed a KISS in Ft. Lauderdale (where I was replacing my Fischer Panda (ooops, slap, slap, slap :-) ) before I moved the boat back to Guatemala. As a result I only have a few weeks experience with it. I will say that I'm having trouble with vibration. I've carefully followed their instructions on ballancing the blades, but I'm still getting vibration. I'm planning on machining a replacement support-pole hub that will have a bearing in it that will ride against the stainless pole. That will get rid of most of the vibration I suspect. I will also agree that the thermal cutouts seem to cut-out too soon. I noted I was getting cut-outs in the 20-25 kt range. Even worse, this seemed to have disabled the STOP switch position. To me this means that if I don't stop it in time that I may have to use a pole to swing it sideways into the wind, which is probably something that I don't want to do if the wind is getting up there and especially if I'm out at sea. If this is what is really happening (and I think that it is), this is a serious design flaw. On the plus side it's very easy to maintain and parts are available anywhere. And it's VERY quiet. You can hear the blades woosh, but that's about all. I hate the Air Marines and have even moved in an anchorage due to their noise. -- Geoff P.S. If you're interested, there's a photo of the generator at http://www.geoffschultz.org/2003 _Sailing/BlueJacket_Work/imagepages/image9.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff,
Interesting about the thermal cutout bypassing the switch. That bears looking into. The few times I experienced the cutouts engaging, I just went and threw the switch and it shutdown. It could have been that the cutouts had released by then anyway. I used the pole mount kit that had rubber pads at the base. The 2 braces go to the side and top of the radar arch and also have rubber pads inside the pipe clamps. Very little vibration and then only at higher speeds. Doug "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 7.77... Doug, I just installed a KISS in Ft. Lauderdale (where I was replacing my Fischer Panda (ooops, slap, slap, slap :-) ) before I moved the boat back to Guatemala. As a result I only have a few weeks experience with it. I will say that I'm having trouble with vibration. I've carefully followed their instructions on ballancing the blades, but I'm still getting vibration. I'm planning on machining a replacement support-pole hub that will have a bearing in it that will ride against the stainless pole. That will get rid of most of the vibration I suspect. I will also agree that the thermal cutouts seem to cut-out too soon. I noted I was getting cut-outs in the 20-25 kt range. Even worse, this seemed to have disabled the STOP switch position. To me this means that if I don't stop it in time that I may have to use a pole to swing it sideways into the wind, which is probably something that I don't want to do if the wind is getting up there and especially if I'm out at sea. If this is what is really happening (and I think that it is), this is a serious design flaw. On the plus side it's very easy to maintain and parts are available anywhere. And it's VERY quiet. You can hear the blades woosh, but that's about all. I hate the Air Marines and have even moved in an anchorage due to their noise. -- Geoff P.S. If you're interested, there's a photo of the generator at http://www.geoffschultz.org/2003 _Sailing/BlueJacket_Work/imagepages/image9.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fischer panda problems | Cruising | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum Shutting Down | General | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum | General | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum | Boat Building |