| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "sherwindu" wrote in message ... Gordon wrote: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...GHUN14OU18.DTL Looks like they got caught in that big storm. Gordon The article referenced above had the following comment" "Double-hulled catamaran sailboats are fast and lightweight -- and harder to capsize than some single-hull sloops. " What they should have added is that single hull boats have one stable state, right side up. Even when they capsize, the heavy keel will bring it back upright. A catamaran, on the other hand, is stable in two configurations, upright and upside down. Once they flip, they almost never right themselves. Sherwin D. Yeah, possibly on the bottom. Whereas the catamaran won't sink. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Yep, don't leave the boat until the boat leaves you. I would feel safer in a multihull. -- SeeYaa Harbin Osteen KG6UROWhen American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? - |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Harbin Osteen" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "sherwindu" wrote in message ... Gordon wrote: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...GHUN14OU18.DTL Looks like they got caught in that big storm. Gordon The article referenced above had the following comment" "Double-hulled catamaran sailboats are fast and lightweight -- and harder to capsize than some single-hull sloops. " What they should have added is that single hull boats have one stable state, right side up. Even when they capsize, the heavy keel will bring it back upright. A catamaran, on the other hand, is stable in two configurations, upright and upside down. Once they flip, they almost never right themselves. Sherwin D. Yeah, possibly on the bottom. Whereas the catamaran won't sink. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Yep, don't leave the boat until the boat leaves you. I would feel safer in a multihull. -- SeeYaa Harbin Osteen KG6UROWhen American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? Obviously, I don't know better than anyone else what actually happened. However, my guess is that they were on deck trying to get control of the situation (as most of us would try to do), got hit by a big wave/high gust combination, and went over the side either because they didn't use a harness or the harness broke. Counter intuitive though it might have been, they were safer below, hove to as best as they could manage. I also don't understand why they didn't activate their EPIRB. There's no requirement that the boat be sinking to do so. I'm betting we'll never know with certainty what happened. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've thought about this a lot, especially since a number of my friends
thought it might have been my cat - we are planning to sail from Trinidad to Mexico this spring. I realize that in the past I've felt very safe in the cockpit of my catamaran, enough not to require my crew or myself to use a harness. I realize this is probably not as precautious an attitude as I'd thought, at least not at night or during anything other than great weather. While we always have jack lines rigged up for going outside the coamings, I think a line running abeam just below the bimini hard top might not be a bad idea at all. Your hypothesis of what might have happened, and your advice about staying inside, hove to, etc. seem spot on to me. Also, an SSB or HAM radio, or maybe a satellite phone would have been an excellent option. I was once in a very bad storm off Magdelina Bay, the worst I've ever seen. I radioed a friend, gave him my coordinates and checked back in every hour. Nothing bad happened, but knowing there was someone on land watching for me helped the crew's (and my) piece of mind immensely. Had we had problems, at least someone would have known our position and last status. Cheers, Robb Capt. JG wrote: Obviously, I don't know better than anyone else what actually happened. However, my guess is that they were on deck trying to get control of the situation (as most of us would try to do), got hit by a big wave/high gust combination, and went over the side either because they didn't use a harness or the harness broke. Counter intuitive though it might have been, they were safer below, hove to as best as they could manage. I also don't understand why they didn't activate their EPIRB. There's no requirement that the boat be sinking to do so. I'm betting we'll never know with certainty what happened. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Capt. JG wrote: Obviously, I don't know better than anyone else what actually happened. Me too........ However, my guess is that they were on deck trying to get control of the situation (as most of us would try to do), got hit by a big wave/high gust combination, and went over the side either because they didn't use a harness or the harness broke. Swept clean. Counter intuitive though it might have been, they were safer below, hove to as best as they could manage. And if flipped, still floating it no communication with the sea. I also don't understand why they didn't activate their EPIRB. There's no requirement that the boat be sinking to do so. One crew inside. Why? maybe resting. maybe too sick to be on deck, maybe navigator/radio. Flipped, hit head. Noody on deck any more and only one left not able inside. Personally I like to establish a radio check-in on the hour. Gives the USCG kid somthing to do and log. No contact, sooner to start the search. Every minuet counts when there is only :45 on the exposure clock. But who knows. I'm betting we'll never know with certainty what happened. Dead men tell no tales. ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gordon wrote:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...GHUN14OU18.DTL Looks like they got caught in that big storm. Gordon CG has suspended search for the 3 missing crewmen. Craft was a 44 footer coming from Frisco to Puget Sound. Last log input stated they had lowered the sails and streamed 2 anchors. EPIRB was found locked up where it couldn't deploy. Gordon |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:00:53 -0800, Gordon wrote:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...GHUN14OU18.DTL Looks like they got caught in that big storm. Gordon More he http://news.google.com/?ned=us&ncl=1112035558&hl=en Matt O. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
The following is the actual NOAA weather forecast for the storm. I
clipped this the night of the strom to email to some friends. - - - - - - - - - COASTAL WATERS FORECAST NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PORTLAND OREGON 903 PM PST THU DEC 14 2006 COASTAL WATERS FROM CAPE SHOALWATER WASHINGTON TO FLORENCE OREGON AND WESTWARD 60 NM STORM WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 4 AM PST FRIDAY TONIGHT S WIND 45 TO 55 KT WITH GUSTS TO 70 KT... VEERING TO SW 45 TO 50 KT WITH GUSTS TO 60 KT AFTER MIDNIGHT. COMBINED SEAS 38 FT DOMINANT PERIOD 12 SECONDS. SHOWERS AND SCATTERED TSTMS. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..OFFSHORE WATERS FORECAST 830 PM PST THU DEC 14 2006 WASHINGTON AND OREGON WATERS FROM 60 NM TO 250 NM OFFSHORE. CAPE FLATTERY TO CAPE LOOKOUT HURRICANE FORCE WIND WARNING OVERNIGHT W TO NW WINDS 45 TO 55 KT...EXCEPT TO 65 KT OVER THE W PORTION EARLY. SEAS 14 TO 21 FT BUILDING TO 24 TO 35 FT...HIGHEST SE. SCATTERED SHOWERS...BECOMING ISOLATED LATE. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Of the 35 or so comments thus far, no one has questioned why this boat was in the strom to begin with. Even if the boat did not have SSB or a SAT phone to check in with someone, it would have had to have a VHF radio and they clearly would have heard the constant NOAA Weather forecasts stating that HURRICANE FORCE WINDS were expected, with 38 foot seas. This is not a case of them being caught in a strom 3000 miles out to sea. They were hugging the coast and could have ducked into any number of ports. All I can think of is that they thought they could tough it out, which I would think is a bad assumption given that you have no exerience with how that boat handles, or, they waited too long to head for cover and by then the coast guard had closed the entrances to the harbors because the waves were already breaking on the bars. Thus leaving them stuck out in the open. Last fall I traveled down that same stretch, and it only took about a 10 foot swell to close all of the bar entrances, to non-comercial vessels under 50 feet in length. -Mark "Calpurnia" www.goreads.com |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is not a case of them being caught in a strom 3000 miles out to sea. They were hugging the coast and could have ducked into any number of ports. All I can think of is that they thought they could tough it out, which I would think is a bad assumption given that you have no exerience with how that boat handles, or, they waited too long to head for cover and by then the coast guard had closed the entrances to the harbors because the waves were already breaking on the bars. Thus leaving them stuck out in the open. Last fall I traveled down that same stretch, and it only took about a 10 foot swell to close all of the bar entrances, to non-comercial vessels under 50 feet in length. -Mark Mark R. wrote: The following is the actual NOAA weather forecast for the storm. I clipped this the night of the strom to email to some friends. WASHINGTON AND OREGON WATERS FROM 60 NM TO 250 NM OFFSHORE. CAPE FLATTERY TO CAPE LOOKOUT HURRICANE FORCE WIND WARNING Of the 35 or so comments thus far, no one has questioned why this boat was in the strom to begin with. Its not polite to critize the dead. There are parents, sisters, lovedones listening and so to those sitting at Davy Jones' table. Even if the boat did not have SSB or a SAT phone to check in with someone, it would have had to have a VHF radio and they clearly would have heard the constant NOAA Weather forecasts stating that HURRICANE FORCE WINDS were expected, with 38 foot seas. Yes, and if you read the Ocean Prediction Center weather maps there is a little boax that says those estimates are ONLY the upper 1/3 mean wave higth. In other words, there's gonna be a lot more and a lot bigger than the predicted wave size. NOw add to that weather advisory... 1) greater wave size because of shallow areas around headlands (cape balanco) and 2) increased wind speed at the headlands. 1+2= Bodies not recovered. Last fall I traveled down that same stretch, and it only took about a 10 foot swell to close all of the bar entrances, to non-comercial vessels under 50 feet in length. Well that depends. Astoria, Newport, Coos Bay are the "good bars" Then ya have the little ones that are never dredged any more because all the Dredge money goes to the Texas and southern ports. Gee I wonder why? Sure no need to dredge all those "blue state" channels found in WA OR CA. A few months ago some body here posted a troll. It went somethin like this: "...I need advice. Im going to sail a new to me boat north from SF to Seattle in NOvember. I know Im late but still got to go. Im new to sailing...etc." Looks like that troll was actually a tragic forecast. Take it how you want. While I type this Im siting in a motel on the south side to the Yaquina Bay bridge.Just opend a botttle of Columbia Crest Merlot I got from Safeway. Under seven bucks. Good deal. But back to fallin mariners. My house got a widow blown out when that storm went threw. I think it gusted to 106 mph here. Ive seen the same thing happen EVER year on this coast. The first time i was a junior at NHS. My friend larry and i wnt down to Waldport to check out the sail boat that got blown on the beach. A 40 year old story and remarkable the same: 60 yo couple retire and sell everything. Get a nice 32-34" steal boat and head noth form southern cal. They always had a dream to sail the world said the obituary. Well they hit a storm about Cape Blanco, got sick, got beat up. The boat was half sanded in when we got there. i think we were the first there, or at least there were no other foot prins on the sand. The ports were 8" or so round and blown in. one was shattered. The salon was full of sand. A few of their personal things were floating around inside. A coat, a book, a dream. And dont even get me started with these OUPV guys. they kill more coastal visitors every year than I have time to descibe. Lesson learned? Dont get stuck between a rock and a hard spot. I wish that people would start reading the Coast Pilot or a crusing guide. Bob -Mark "Calpurnia" www.goreads.com "Calpurnia" www.goreads.com |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark R." wrote in message ups.com... The following is the actual NOAA weather forecast for the storm. I clipped this the night of the strom to email to some friends. - - - - - - - - - COASTAL WATERS FORECAST Snip....snip.... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Of the 35 or so comments thus far, no one has questioned why this boat was in the strom to begin with. Snip....Snip.... -Mark "Calpurnia" www.goreads.com In the article, it said "What we do know is that the new owner hired a British yacht delivery company to deliver the boat from South Africa to Washington for the Seattle Boat Show in January. They stopped in San Francisco and left again on December 8. That was the last anyone heard from the crew". How long would it take to get to Seattle from San Francisco? I would think that they would have time to wait out the storm before pushing on to Seattle. Link to article: http://www.latitude38.com/LectronicL...#anchor1085433 -- SeeYaa Harbin Osteen KG6UROWhen American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? - |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the article, it said "What we do know is that the new owner hired a British yacht delivery company to deliver the boat from South Africa to Washington for the Seattle Boat Show in January. They stopped in San Francisco and left again on December 8. That was the last anyone heard from the crew". How long would it take to get to Seattle from San Francisco? I would think that they would have time to wait out the storm before pushing on to Seattle. There are two ways to make the trip, head out to sea about a 100 miles where the waves are not piled up so much, or stick along the coast so you can jump into a harbor if the weather turns nasty. It took me over three weeks to hug the coast when I was heading south from Seattle to San Diego. Twice I got stuck in a harbor, when the coast guard would close the entrance and not allow any boats in or out because of waves breaking on the bar. This groups challenge was that they were headed against the wind and the general direction of the swell. That makes for a tough trip on a good day, but when the wind is blowing 90 and the seas are 40 feet, I'm not sure how you are making any progress in a controlled fashion. The fact that the delivery comany was a "British" group may imply that they were not aware of the challenge with the harbors being closed when the waves pickup. It is also possible, but not probable, that the were not aware how the NOAA weather service works and that you need to change chanels about every 30 miles or so and thus would have thought they were out of range and could not get weather info. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Coast Guard Tips Off Ships Before Security Inspections | General | |||
| Coast Guard Tips Off Ships Before Security Inspections | General | |||
| HAM and SSB Frequencies | Cruising | |||
| Today's Coast Guard Rescue Story, with photo links | General | |||
| Coast Guard Searching for WWII veterans: | General | |||