Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:22:18 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: These kinds of discussion almost always take place without benefit of actual prop calculations. A two blade prop is inherently more efficient than a three blade. A single blade would be even more efficient if there was a way to avoid the vibration due to imbalance. Counterbalance. I've seen single blade props on airplanes, motorized gliders and even small RC aircraft. And I remember seeing a single blade boat prop in an article online a few years ago but can't find it now. It had a single blade and on the other side a rounded-off bulge in the shaft as a counterbalance. I think the reason they're not more popular is that they just look strange. Steve |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Unlubberizing the Single Screw Inboard, Part II | General | |||
A freewheeling explanation | Cruising | |||
Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) | Cruising | |||
What are the pros and cons of a folding prop? | Cruising | |||
Removing lower unit from 40 hp Johnson outboard - Help? | General |