Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you decide. They are both decent boats, but if you are doing
sailing for sailing's sake, the 9.6 is the better deal by far. If the C. 30 is your first cruising boat, go that way. Neither boat is wrong, just less or more right for you. And then you might want to look at good Pearson 30, a boat that outsails the Catalina as well and is better put togther than either. Average cost = 15K. Capt RB C&C 32 NY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Pearson 30 is an excellent boat and a great sailer, but is even
more into "old school" sailing than the Columbia 9.6, and is likely to have an antique set of hank-on sails and one old car battery in it to power the nav lights and maybe the LORAN G. Pearson 30 was built between 1971 and 1981, I believe. Pretty much the same era, but more of a sailors boat. Most have been updated. Mine had factory wheel, along with furling and full batten main. Most alberg 30's I see these days have furling! I now sail a C&C 32, which is faster and more refined...but the P30 was a heck of a boat. Capt RB C&C 32 NY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ON Topic -- Power boat novice seeks advice | General | |||
Prop Size - Advice on Advice? | General | |||
Sage restoration advice wanted (osmosis) | General | |||
advice needed on cruiser/motorsailer purchase | Cruising | |||
Practical alternative to buying paper charts? | Cruising |