Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. I always have to grin when people tell me the Lavac needs no maintenance, that only the pump requires occasional--about every 5 years or so--rebuilding. I don't know of any other toilet BOWLS that require any maintenance either...MAYBE a new seat/lid every 10 years or so--which is usually less often than the Lavac needs a new seal. Nor does any decent quality toilet pump require rebuilding any more often than about once every 5 years or so as long as it's kept lubricated. But there's something about putting the pump 2-5' from the bowl instead of right next to it on the same base that changes everything in people's minds. I'm not knocking the Lavac...it's an outstanding toilet--though not necessarily the right toilet for everyone. But I can't help wondering if it would have even a fraction of the appeal it has, if it worked exactly the same way, but the pump and bowl were side-by-side on a single base. ![]() -- Peggie You are absolutely right! I never thought of that but it is true, psychologically it makes a difference. Or, as they say: It is all in the head ![]() --Ernst |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Friday Ethics Question | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building |