Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Budget max to buy is low $100k's. Annual budget would be in the
neighborhood of $25-30k. Cap'n Ric wrote: Annual budget of 30K for a power boat isn't much unless you plan on not going very far. Or get a boat that is fuel efficient (ie not a speedboat) From what I have read, and talking to a lot of different cruiser in both power & sail bost, there isn't a whole lot of difference in the cost of cruising (unless you are burning fuel to make ten tons of boat & furniture plane). DSK |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Budget max to buy is low $100k's. Annual budget would be in the neighborhood of $25-30k. Cap'n Ric wrote: Annual budget of 30K for a power boat isn't much unless you plan on not going very far. Or get a boat that is fuel efficient (ie not a speedboat) From what I have read, and talking to a lot of different cruiser in both power & sail bost, there isn't a whole lot of difference in the cost of cruising (unless you are burning fuel to make ten tons of boat & furniture plane). DSK Though one can never rely on manufacturer's claims, the range of boats we're looking at are single engine or small twin trawlers that seem to burn well under 10gph with most quoted in the 4 - 7gph range. We don't expect to break any speed records - in fact, maybe the idea behind a cruise, at least for us, is the journey as much as the destination. That may change in the long-run, but for now, that's the vision. However, some factors that have been brought to our attention include insurance and home slip. We have not taken these fully into consideration. So we do need to pay more attention to these fixed costs in our annual operating budget. We have a great deal on our current slip and our insurance broker has done a very effective job to minimize our costs. We have some time, plenty of time, before we commit. I just hope the current prices stay depressed until AFTER we make the purchase. ![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cal Vanize wrote:
Though one can never rely on manufacturer's claims, the range of boats we're looking at are single engine or small twin trawlers that seem to burn well under 10gph with most quoted in the 4 - 7gph range. We burn about 1 3/4 gph cruising about 7 to 7.5 knots. The boat will (in theory) go 8.5 but fuel consumption starts getting up into the 5gph range and we make a loke of wake and foam and noise, for not a lot of speed gained. http://sports.webshots.com/album/550708407IeSjaU ... We don't expect to break any speed records - in fact, maybe the idea behind a cruise, at least for us, is the journey as much as the destination. That may change in the long-run, but for now, that's the vision. Sure. There are too many great places, too close together, to be worth rushing frantically from one to the next. We've had cruises in NC and on the Chesapeake where we never went more than 30 miles in a day and enjoyed beautiful anchorages every night. However, some factors that have been brought to our attention include insurance and home slip. We have not taken these fully into consideration. So we do need to pay more attention to these fixed costs in our annual operating budget. We have a great deal on our current slip and our insurance broker has done a very effective job to minimize our costs. And don't forget, cruising is best defined as "fixing your boat in exotic & inconvenient locations." There will always be unexpected expenses, but with good skills & foresight they are not crippling. IMHO 30K a year is do-able. People are out there cruising for less. We have some time, plenty of time, before we commit. I just hope the current prices stay depressed until AFTER we make the purchase. ![]() I think the price depression of the boat market is mostly a matter of more realistic expectations on the part of sellers who are trying to unload neglected boats. The top 10% of boats in best condition seem to be selling readily. However, I do think there are two long term factors (and they affect more than just the boat market) 1- the golden age of retirement is over. Fewer & fewer people are going to be able to afford to buy a boat and cruise when they stop work (or just slow down). 1a- waterfront property is getting more & more expensive driving up costs for marinas & facilities; boating expenses are climb & it's going to be harder & harder to find out-of-the-way Mom-N-Pop friendly marinas. 2- younger people are less & less interested in the outdoors in general. The demand for boats (relative to the population) is shrinking. But hey, if it was all gonna be easy, it wouldn't be fun! Fair Skies Doug King |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:36:48 -0500, DSK wrote:
We burn about 1 3/4 gph cruising about 7 to 7.5 knots. The boat will (in theory) go 8.5 but fuel consumption starts getting up into the 5gph range and we make a loke of wake and foam and noise, for not a lot of speed gained. Here's another data point: On our Grand Banks 49 we average about 1 gallon per mile on extended cruises unless we make a really concious effort to economize which can save an additional 10 to 20%. That includes about 4 hours per day of generator time, running on both engines, and using active stabilizers virtually 100% of the time. Our average speed is about 8.5 kts, slowing to about 7.9 if we are really trying to stretch the fuel. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:36:48 -0500, DSK wrote: We burn about 1 3/4 gph cruising about 7 to 7.5 knots. The boat will (in theory) go 8.5 but fuel consumption starts getting up into the 5gph range and we make a loke of wake and foam and noise, for not a lot of speed gained. Here's another data point: On our Grand Banks 49 we average about 1 gallon per mile on extended cruises unless we make a really concious effort to economize which can save an additional 10 to 20%. That includes about 4 hours per day of generator time, running on both engines, and using active stabilizers virtually 100% of the time. Our average speed is about 8.5 kts, slowing to about 7.9 if we are really trying to stretch the fuel. This doesn't seem quite right to me - my catamaran, which weighs about 15% of what your trawler weighs, uses almost as much fuel. If you boat displaces 60000 pounds, then it will need about 60 HP to get over 7 knots, 90 hp to get to 8.5 knots. Looking at specs for various Caterpillar engines, the gallons/hour at 60 hp is 3+ gals. Using two smaller engines doesn't help that much, though at least they can idle with lower consumption. Your number only make sense if you spend more time on average using you engines to run the A/C than propel the boat. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:51:33 -0500, Jeff wrote:
This doesn't seem quite right to me - my catamaran, which weighs about 15% of what your trawler weighs, uses almost as much fuel. If you boat displaces 60000 pounds, then it will need about 60 HP to get over 7 knots, 90 hp to get to 8.5 knots. Looking at specs for various Caterpillar engines, the gallons/hour at 60 hp is 3+ gals. Using two smaller engines doesn't help that much, though at least they can idle with lower consumption. Your number only make sense if you spend more time on average using you engines to run the A/C than propel the boat. I'm not entirely sure that I understand your point. The numbers are what they are, and yes, the boat weighs about 60,000 lbs. The engines are twin Detroit 6-71s which are way bigger than what is actually needed to run at 8.5 kts. I'm sure that introduces some inefficiencies. The port side engine also drives a hydraulic pump for the stabilizer system. It wouldn't surprise me if that took an additional 10 to 20 hp, or about 1 gph. The primary generator is an oversized 20 KW unit that uses about 1 gph on average but we do not run it continuously except in hot weather. The best we have ever done is about 6 gallons per hour running 7.9 kts in flat water, and using the smaller backup generator as little as possible. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:51:33 -0500, Jeff wrote: This doesn't seem quite right to me - my catamaran, which weighs about 15% of what your trawler weighs, uses almost as much fuel. If you boat displaces 60000 pounds, then it will need about 60 HP to get over 7 knots, 90 hp to get to 8.5 knots. Looking at specs for various Caterpillar engines, the gallons/hour at 60 hp is 3+ gals. Using two smaller engines doesn't help that much, though at least they can idle with lower consumption. Your number only make sense if you spend more time on average using you engines to run the A/C than propel the boat. I'm not entirely sure that I understand your point. The numbers are what they are, and yes, the boat weighs about 60,000 lbs. The engines are twin Detroit 6-71s which are way bigger than what is actually needed to run at 8.5 kts. I'm sure that introduces some inefficiencies. The port side engine also drives a hydraulic pump for the stabilizer system. It wouldn't surprise me if that took an additional 10 to 20 hp, or about 1 gph. The primary generator is an oversized 20 KW unit that uses about 1 gph on average but we do not run it continuously except in hot weather. The best we have ever done is about 6 gallons per hour running 7.9 kts in flat water, and using the smaller backup generator as little as possible. Sorry - I read 1 GPM as 1 GPH! Doing about 8 GPH when approaching hull speed is in line with my rules of thumb. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK inscribed in red ink for all to know:
Budget max to buy is low $100k's. Annual budget would be in the neighborhood of $25-30k. Cap'n Ric wrote: Annual budget of 30K for a power boat isn't much unless you plan on not going very far. Or get a boat that is fuel efficient (ie not a speedboat) From what I have read, and talking to a lot of different cruiser in both power & sail bost, there isn't a whole lot of difference in the cost of cruising (unless you are burning fuel to make ten tons of boat & furniture plane). DSK I can only offer this direct, real-world comparison. Two years ago, we (and our 50' ketch, Perkins 4-236 4 cyl diesel) made a month-long trip from Seattle to Desolation Sound and back. During the same time frame, friends of ours down the dock made essentially the same trip in their 55' (?) trawler-style power boat. Not sure of the power plants, but they are also diesel. We burned 95 gallons of diesel over the course of the month. The power boat burned 895 gallons of diesel. bob s/v Eolian Seattle |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RW Salnick wrote: DSK inscribed in red ink for all to know: Budget max to buy is low $100k's. Annual budget would be in the neighborhood of $25-30k. Cap'n Ric wrote: Annual budget of 30K for a power boat isn't much unless you plan on not going very far. Or get a boat that is fuel efficient (ie not a speedboat) From what I have read, and talking to a lot of different cruiser in both power & sail bost, there isn't a whole lot of difference in the cost of cruising (unless you are burning fuel to make ten tons of boat & furniture plane). DSK I can only offer this direct, real-world comparison. Two years ago, we (and our 50' ketch, Perkins 4-236 4 cyl diesel) made a month-long trip from Seattle to Desolation Sound and back. During the same time frame, friends of ours down the dock made essentially the same trip in their 55' (?) trawler-style power boat. Not sure of the power plants, but they are also diesel. We burned 95 gallons of diesel over the course of the month. The power boat burned 895 gallons of diesel. bob s/v Eolian Seattle How much time was spent under sail? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RW Salnick wrote:
I can only offer this direct, real-world comparison. Two years ago, we (and our 50' ketch, Perkins 4-236 4 cyl diesel) made a month-long trip from Seattle to Desolation Sound and back. During the same time frame, friends of ours down the dock made essentially the same trip in their 55' (?) trawler-style power boat. Not sure of the power plants, but they are also diesel. We burned 95 gallons of diesel over the course of the month. The power boat burned 895 gallons of diesel. Cal Vanize wrote: How much time was spent under sail? Going at what speed? Not meaning to be suspicious but a lot of "trawler style" power boats these days are semi-planing hulls disguised to look like tugboats. If two boats of relatively similar LWL & displacement motor at the same speed, their fuel consumption will generally be pretty close to the same. Now, how much did you spend on sails & running rigging, and how much fuel would that amount buy? ![]() DSK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An essay on cruising boats | Cruising | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |