Bill Kearney wrote:
The whole notion that it's somehow any sort of realistic risk. Sure,
there's all sorts of things that "could go wrong"


So you acknowledge a real increase in
risk . . .


but in reality they very
seldom do.


meaning you believe the risks are lower
(i.e., more seldom) than others believe
them to be?


Seems it's just fashionable lately to
scream like Chicken Little
about so-called risks because of increased security procedures. I find it
rather tiresome.

And therefore hearing others espouse
different assessments of risk than those
you hold is rather tiresome to you and
you would rather they either adopt your
risk assessments or simply remain silent?

Thank you for sharing that with us, Bill.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----