Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More transmissions
I replaced the Hurth HBW100 transmission on an 18-hp Universal diesel I
owned a few years back. The original transmission simply refused to engage in forward. Reverse, OK. I was told at the time that replacement would be almost as cheap as rebuilding. Maybe, maybe not. Now, I have another boat with an HBW100 transmission. The previous owner had trouble with the original unit. He replaced it, and the new transmission did not perform well. Hurth replaced that transmission ultimately. He sold the boat to me, and now I'm having trouble with the second new transmission, although it has very few hours. Is there a problem with these units I don't know about? Is there another make of transmission that would slip seamlessly into the hole left by a Hurth transmission? BTW, for the earlier poster: Replacement isn't hard if you can get at your unit. I think folks have already made that point. |
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More transmissions
I'm not terribly impressed with Hurth transmissions. I had a 100 mated to a
35hp Perkins in my Westsail 32 that failed after only a couple of hundred hours. I had it rebuilt, and then it failed again. Thinking the transmission was simply too lightweight to shove the Westie around, I replaced it with a 150, a much huskier transmission. (None of these shenanigans were covered by Hurth, btw.) That seemed to do the trick, and two subsequent owners of the boat, as far as I know, have not had any further problems. We now have a Victory Tug with a 150 hp. Cummins and a Borg Warner Velvet Drive transmission: a truly honkin' gearbox. Bottom line: in my experience, the Hurth transmissions are at least suspect. Dick Behan M/V "Annie" "Jim" wrote in message ups.com... I replaced the Hurth HBW100 transmission on an 18-hp Universal diesel I owned a few years back. The original transmission simply refused to engage in forward. Reverse, OK. I was told at the time that replacement would be almost as cheap as rebuilding. Maybe, maybe not. Now, I have another boat with an HBW100 transmission. The previous owner had trouble with the original unit. He replaced it, and the new transmission did not perform well. Hurth replaced that transmission ultimately. He sold the boat to me, and now I'm having trouble with the second new transmission, although it has very few hours. Is there a problem with these units I don't know about? Is there another make of transmission that would slip seamlessly into the hole left by a Hurth transmission? BTW, for the earlier poster: Replacement isn't hard if you can get at your unit. I think folks have already made that point. |
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More transmissions
R.W. Behan wrote:
I'm not terribly impressed with Hurth transmissions. I had a 100 mated to a 35hp Perkins in my Westsail 32 that failed after only a couple of hundred hours. I had it rebuilt, and then it failed again. Thinking the transmission was simply too lightweight to shove the Westie around, I replaced it with a 150, a much huskier transmission. (None of these shenanigans were covered by Hurth, btw.) That seemed to do the trick, and two subsequent owners of the boat, as far as I know, have not had any further problems. We now have a Victory Tug with a 150 hp. Cummins and a Borg Warner Velvet Drive transmission: a truly honkin' gearbox. This gearbox is now the ZF 10 M The HBW 100's torque rating is pretty low. For a 2.045 ratio, the maximum HP / RPM is 38 HP @ 3000 RPM. So while a 35 HP / 3000 Perkins may just be under the maximum rating, if you miss the footnote you might be in trouble, depending on the number of cylinders. Note: For all "M" (Mechanical) transmissions reduce power capacity by the following shock factors: 1 cylinder engine ÷ 1.25, 2 cylinder engine ÷ 1.20, 3 cylinder engine ÷ 1.15" The "Pleasure" rating isn't very high either: "Highly intermittent operation with very large variations in engine speed and power Average engine operating hours limit: 500 hours/year 300 hours/year for mechanical gearboxes" Translation - don't expect too much at this rating. Don't run it all day at full power. Here's the ratings page: http://zf-marine.com/ZFR/Transmissio...ngs&GN=ZF_10_M We had one on a 23 HP, 3000 RPM Isuzu. Put 1800 hours on it over 4 years. Never hiccuped. I suspect that the box is just undersized for that size engine Evan Gatehouse |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Volvo Penta MS-3 Transmissions | General | |||
Transmissions | Cruising | |||
HAM and SSB Frequencies | Cruising | |||
Marine Transmissions | Cruising | |||
Transmissions | Cruising |