![]() |
|
Ferry encounter
Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels
change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I’ve had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn’t a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn’t change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn’t want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn’t see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn’t luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
Roger Long wrote:
Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I’ve had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn’t a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn’t change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn’t want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn’t see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn’t luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? Roger...don't mess with ferries. A buddy of mine had the job of ferrying school kids over water off the islands between the mainland and Vancouver Island. He got a bit close to one of the big BC ferrys and all hell broke lose. Ended up being threatened with charges and lost his job. They are supreme beings out on the waterways. Stay well away from them. |
Ferry encounter
There are new rules about leaving clearances around ferries, since 9/11.
I think it might be two hundred yards, but it's been a little while since I saw the notices. They were posted all around our marinas and in the newspapers as well. Never saw them, out your way? Riding the Bainbridge ferry to Seattle, I've even occasionally seen Coast Guard escorts in high-speed inflatables, with mounted 50 caliber machine guns. I'd leave them plenty of room if I were you. They might get a little twitchy if you try to pull the old sail right-of-way flim-flam on them. Besides, they're not very maneuverable and they might hit you even while they were trying to avoid you. Regards, Tom Dacon "Roger Long" wrote in message ... Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. We sail with ferries all of the time in the SF bay, and they know the rules and obey them. We do not change course to avoid them, unless they're either in front of us and it's an overtaking situation (damn rare) or coming into or out of a restricted spot, such as the short channel near the ferry dock. If I were you, I would have gotten her numbers and given them or the CG a call. I had an encounter with a fishing boat coming back to port that was somewhat similar. We were sailing, they were overtaking and had plenty of room to go around. Their skipper decided that not being late for dinner was more important that following the rules, and we barely were able to avoid the boat, taking evasive action as a last resort after signalling (no time for a call on the VHF, but I doubt they were listening). I knew who they were and where they were berthed and discussed the situation with the harbor master upon our arrival. He had had other complaints about this particular boat, and promised to look into it. We've seen them out there after this happened in somewhat similar situations, and they have not failed to give way. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
"Capt. JG" wrote:
"Roger Long" wrote in message .. . Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. We sail with ferries all of the time in the SF bay, and they know the rules and obey them. We do not change course to avoid them, unless they're either in front of us and it's an overtaking situation (damn rare) or coming into or out of a restricted spot, such as the short channel near the ferry dock. If I were you, I would have gotten her numbers and given them or the CG a call. I had an encounter with a fishing boat coming back to port that was somewhat similar. We were sailing, they were overtaking and had plenty of room to go around. Their skipper decided that not being late for dinner was more important that following the rules, and we barely were able to avoid the boat, taking evasive action as a last resort after signalling (no time for a call on the VHF, but I doubt they were listening). I knew who they were and where they were berthed and discussed the situation with the harbor master upon our arrival. He had had other complaints about this particular boat, and promised to look into it. We've seen them out there after this happened in somewhat similar situations, and they have not failed to give way. We have had similar situations, although we were almost always under power but we were being overtaken. The first one was in mid 2000 - a menhaden boat coming into the Greater Wicomico to Reedville. We were under sail, but were in the process of turning on the engine to go into anchor in Mill Creek off the Great Wicomico. As we were coming in, a large (abt 100 feet) grey boat came boiling up behind us on the port side. We were on the starboard side of the channel, but thought since he was overtaking that he would go around us. NOT. We finally made a panic circle to the starboard out of the channel so that he wouldn't ram us. At that point he made a whole bunch of rapid blasts of his horn. The second incident was the first time we went down the ICW when we were on the Elizabeth River in Norfolk in November 2000. The Elizabeth River ferry paddle wheel came out from his dock and turned down the river along our port side. He started to pass us and got almost all the way past, and then decided to come over to the other side of the river, and turned almost right into us. I thought we would be skewered. We speeded up so he went behind us. So a little later on in the trip, when we encountered the Fort Fisher ferry, we tried to stay out of their way, because these ferries apparently don't deviate from their track, and the route isn't obvious on the charts (although it is on the road map) .. |
Ferry encounter
"Rosalie B." wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in message . .. Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. We sail with ferries all of the time in the SF bay, and they know the rules and obey them. We do not change course to avoid them, unless they're either in front of us and it's an overtaking situation (damn rare) or coming into or out of a restricted spot, such as the short channel near the ferry dock. If I were you, I would have gotten her numbers and given them or the CG a call. I had an encounter with a fishing boat coming back to port that was somewhat similar. We were sailing, they were overtaking and had plenty of room to go around. Their skipper decided that not being late for dinner was more important that following the rules, and we barely were able to avoid the boat, taking evasive action as a last resort after signalling (no time for a call on the VHF, but I doubt they were listening). I knew who they were and where they were berthed and discussed the situation with the harbor master upon our arrival. He had had other complaints about this particular boat, and promised to look into it. We've seen them out there after this happened in somewhat similar situations, and they have not failed to give way. We have had similar situations, although we were almost always under power but we were being overtaken. The first one was in mid 2000 - a menhaden boat coming into the Greater Wicomico to Reedville. We were under sail, but were in the process of turning on the engine to go into anchor in Mill Creek off the Great Wicomico. As we were coming in, a large (abt 100 feet) grey boat came boiling up behind us on the port side. We were on the starboard side of the channel, but thought since he was overtaking that he would go around us. NOT. We finally made a panic circle to the starboard out of the channel so that he wouldn't ram us. At that point he made a whole bunch of rapid blasts of his horn. The second incident was the first time we went down the ICW when we were on the Elizabeth River in Norfolk in November 2000. The Elizabeth River ferry paddle wheel came out from his dock and turned down the river along our port side. He started to pass us and got almost all the way past, and then decided to come over to the other side of the river, and turned almost right into us. I thought we would be skewered. We speeded up so he went behind us. So a little later on in the trip, when we encountered the Fort Fisher ferry, we tried to stay out of their way, because these ferries apparently don't deviate from their track, and the route isn't obvious on the charts (although it is on the road map) Interesting.. out here they definitely go around all sailboats. I have yet to see a ferry not follow the rules - although they occasionally hit the docks pretty hard :-) What you're describing really sounds dangerous. I mean how do you know what to do if commercial vessels don't follow the rules of the road? Strange. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
"Roger Long" wrote in news:MGDpg.58359$3B.6612
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up Too bad your digital camera wasn't just sitting there to take a good closeup picture of that empty bridge for the CG boys to consider..... |
Ferry encounter
"Capt. JG" wrote:
"Rosalie B." wrote in message .. . The second incident was the first time we went down the ICW when we were on the Elizabeth River in Norfolk in November 2000. The Elizabeth River ferry paddle wheel came out from his dock and turned down the river along our port side. He started to pass us and got almost all the way past, and then decided to come over to the other side of the river, and turned almost right into us. I thought we would be skewered. We speeded up so he went behind us. So a little later on in the trip, when we encountered the Fort Fisher ferry, we tried to stay out of their way, because these ferries apparently don't deviate from their track, and the route isn't obvious on the charts (although it is on the road map) Interesting.. out here they definitely go around all sailboats. I have yet to see a ferry not follow the rules - although they occasionally hit the docks pretty hard :-) What you're describing really sounds dangerous. I mean how do you know what to do if commercial vessels don't follow the rules of the road? Strange. In the case of both ferries, we were not sailing, we were under power. But in all three cases they were overtaking. In any case, for large commercial vessels of any kind, we get out of their way (if at all possible) before it comes up to following or not following the rules. If necessary, Bob will circle the boat - especially if the ship in question is a tug and tow. We did have a close call once when crossing the Savannah River (motor sailing). The ICW cuts across while large ships are going up and down the river. (The same situation applies for the river in Jacksonville FL, but the sight lines are better.) There was a German warship coming in the river, and we could hear the very southern pilot on the radio warning sailboats in the ICW. I saw the superstructure of the ship (mostly the mast part) through the trees, but did not immediately recognize it as a ship - I thought it was just some funny kind of tree. There was another sailboat ahead of us, and I thought the pilot was talking to them. He could only see our mast, so he couldn't tell that the boat ahead of us was a catamaran. [When I called Bob's attention to the funny 'tree', he did recognize it as a ship.] But when we came out into the river, we saw the warship a very short distance away, and consequently we put on the power to get out of his way and onto the other side of the channel. |
Ferry encounter
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 23:37:16 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I’ve had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn’t a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn’t change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn’t want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn’t see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn’t luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? I can only think of three possibilities: 1) the ferry was using rule 9 of colregs. 2) a traffic seprartion zone is in effect (a chart would show that) 3) harbour regulations (would need to see them) Jack _________________________________________ Jack Dale ISPA Yachtmaster Offshore Instructor CYA Advanced Cruising Instructor http://www.swiftsuresailing.com _________________________________________ |
Ferry encounter
"Rosalie B." wrote in message
... In the case of both ferries, we were not sailing, we were under power. But in all three cases they were overtaking. Sure thing. Doesn't make much difference, since it was an overtaking situation. In any case, for large commercial vessels of any kind, we get out of their way (if at all possible) before it comes up to following or not following the rules. If necessary, Bob will circle the boat - especially if the ship in question is a tug and tow. A good practice if it's practicable. And, of course, there is the issue about restricted maneuverability, which one keep in mind. This comes up all the time for cargo, tanker, tug, etc. situations out here. We did have a close call once when crossing the Savannah River (motor sailing). The ICW cuts across while large ships are going up and down the river. (The same situation applies for the river in Jacksonville FL, but the sight lines are better.) There was a German warship coming in the river, and we could hear the very southern pilot on the radio warning sailboats in the ICW. I saw the superstructure of the ship (mostly the mast part) through the trees, but did not immediately recognize it as a ship - I thought it was just some funny kind of tree. There was another sailboat ahead of us, and I thought the pilot was talking to them. He could only see our mast, so he couldn't tell that the boat ahead of us was a catamaran. [When I called Bob's attention to the funny 'tree', he did recognize it as a ship.] But when we came out into the river, we saw the warship a very short distance away, and consequently we put on the power to get out of his way and onto the other side of the channel. |
Ferry encounter
"Jack Dale" wrote in message
... On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 23:37:16 GMT, "Roger Long" wrote: Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? I can only think of three possibilities: 1) the ferry was using rule 9 of colregs. 2) a traffic seprartion zone is in effect (a chart would show that) 3) harbour regulations (would need to see them) On the first and last one cited, I agree. On the traffic separation zone, I don't think it would make a difference. Just because someone is using the correct lane for their course, doesn't give them license to ignore the other rules. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
Roger Long wrote:
Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? At least it was a lesser encounter than that which we experienced in May of this year, with one of Her Majesty's Trident submarines, which despatched an MOD outrider, an insolent bugger who lost no time in telling us to get out of the sub's way, despite the fact that we had already tacked and were heading directly away from said sub! My post on this matter to uk.rec.sailing invoked a huge response, most of which was directed at the Royal Navy's submarine service for their insolence and intransigence, although a few ex-submariners did side with the sub's captain. I should add that we were in open water, with lots of room to manouever, no "constrained by draft" channels, and took avoiding action almost as soon as the sub hove into sight. It would seem that might is right! Dennis. |
Ferry encounter
I pretty much agree with you and Tom in the other reply when it comes
to the large ferries on shuttle routes. I generally give a them a clear and obvious course change well in advance even when they are the stand on vessel. If they altered course for every sailboat in the harbor, it would be chaos. However, not the 65 feet in the original post. This is one of the little boats that does excursions and services the outer islands. Despite being nearly as wide as it is long and two decks high, it is just a little and very maneuverable boat. There were no other boats nearby, she was at half speed so schedule was clearly not an issue, and two spokes of the wheel would have avoided a lot of work and disruption below for me. No way she could have known the later part but she could see that I was alone on deck and it was blowing hard. By the time it was clear that she wasn't giving an inch, the rule for the stand on vessel to maintain a predictable course was also coming into play. If I'd tried to bear off under her just as she decided to go behind me, I wouldn't have been able to avoid her. Even a tack could have been dicey if she had made a last minute correction. She proceeded exactly as if she had the right of way. The best possibility I can think of, other than sheer arrogance or total ignorance of the surrounding water depths, is that she thought I had my engine running and was therefore a powerboat which would have made us burdened. A lot of people start running their engines around here when it starts to get as gnarly as it was working up to at the time. -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
"Jack Dale" wrote I can only think of three possibilities: 1) the ferry was using rule 9 of colregs. Here is the chart with the ferry (excursion boat would be a more accurate description in this case although it is operated by a ferry line) shown in red and our course in black. I just read rule 9 and I would be curious if anyone would think that it applies to a 6 foot draft vessel near high tide in this case. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Encounter.jpg 2) a traffic seprartion zone is in effect (a chart would show that) Not applicable. 3) harbour regulations (would need to see them) We were outside the harbor. -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
Rosalie B. wrote in
: There was a German warship coming in the river, and we could hear the very southern pilot on the radio warning sailboats in the ICW. I saw the superstructure of the ship (mostly the mast part) through the trees, but did not immediately recognize it as a ship - I thought it was just some funny kind of tree. There was another sailboat ahead of us, and I thought the pilot was talking to them. He could only see our mast, so he couldn't tell that the boat ahead of us was a catamaran. [When I called Bob's attention to the funny 'tree', he did recognize it as a ship.] But when we came out into the river, we saw the warship a very short distance away, and consequently we put on the power to get out of his way and onto the other side of the channel. What a fantastic example for the use of AIS if both boat and ship were so equipped. You and he would have been plotting each other for 10 miles so better synchronization between you would have avoided any conflict. He would have been able to call you BY YOUR NAME AND CALL, not just "sailboat with a mast sticking up". You would have known, not only something was there long before you could see it but WHAT is was and WHO it was and his speed and course for planning purposes..... The sooner every boat is on AIS, the better for everyone..... |
Ferry encounter
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 00:23:11 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote: On the first and last one cited, I agree. On the traffic separation zone, I don't think it would make a difference. Just because someone is using the correct lane for their course, doesn't give them license to ignore the other rules. That could depend on the application of Rule 10 (j) (j) A vessel of less than 20 meters in length or a sailing vessel shall not impede the safe passage of a power driven vessel following a traffic lane. This would not apply as Roger's chart does not show a TSZ. Jack _________________________________________ Jack Dale ISPA Yachtmaster Offshore Instructor CYA Advanced Cruising Instructor http://www.swiftsuresailing.com _________________________________________ |
Ferry encounter
Having sailed the Great Lakes for some 60 years I have had ample
experience with the solid stream of freighters... They don't turn, period... Usually there is not even anyone visible in the bridge windows... I long ago developed the attitude that I will immediately turn away as soon as I see a converging track developing... I am not burning hundreds of dollars an hour of fuel... I can turn on a dime... I like tacking... I am sailing for pleasure... Being ground up underneath a 400 foot cement hauler is not my idea of pleasure... And, likely the person on the bridge (if any) does not speak english and doesn't particularily like 'rich', 'ugly americans'... Just a fact of life for a yachtsman... Just because you think the Colregs say you don't have to turn, doesn't mean you shouldn't... If I were pulling a fish net or dredging, I would ignore the big guy and let him make the quivering explanations in the Admiralty Court as to why he ran someone down... I'm not, so I give way... denny |
Ferry encounter
That's pretty much my attitude but this "ferry" was smaller and as
maneuverable as a lot of the power yachts in the marinas. Just having the paint and logo of the larger boats in the fleet doesn't change the physics. Having just tacked a 32 foot boat alone few minutes earlier and gotten settled down at the end of a long day with the weather going downhill fast, I was sort of in the net towing category you describe. -- Roger Long "Denny" wrote in message oups.com... Having sailed the Great Lakes for some 60 years I have had ample experience with the solid stream of freighters... They don't turn, period... Usually there is not even anyone visible in the bridge windows... I long ago developed the attitude that I will immediately turn away as soon as I see a converging track developing... I am not burning hundreds of dollars an hour of fuel... I can turn on a dime... I like tacking... I am sailing for pleasure... Being ground up underneath a 400 foot cement hauler is not my idea of pleasure... And, likely the person on the bridge (if any) does not speak english and doesn't particularily like 'rich', 'ugly americans'... Just a fact of life for a yachtsman... Just because you think the Colregs say you don't have to turn, doesn't mean you shouldn't... If I were pulling a fish net or dredging, I would ignore the big guy and let him make the quivering explanations in the Admiralty Court as to why he ran someone down... I'm not, so I give way... denny |
Ferry encounter
For the conditions you are discussing, there have been no changes (BTW
"commercial vessels" is not a class of vessel under the Rules). The reasons for the ferry's actions could involve a number of possibilities but none would hold up in court, so I think I'd just put it down to one of those meeting situations we all come across that confirm the need to be ready to act on our own, be we "give way" or "standon". One point....... not being able to see someone in a wheelhouse from your perspective, does not necessarily mean they are not there. Much depends on the layout, location of the helmstation, etc. . Personally, I treat all vessels as if no one is in control. otn "Roger Long" wrote in message ... Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
"Roger Long" wrote in message news: Here is the chart with the ferry (excursion boat would be a more accurate description in this case although it is operated by a ferry line) shown in red and our course in black. I just read rule 9 and I would be curious if anyone would think that it applies to a 6 foot draft vessel near high tide in this case. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Encounter.jpg Roger, From your chart, he/she was definitely following a marked channel. However, with that draft they were in no way restricted to the channel. 1. Some boaters and especially ferry operators following a normal route, tend to be "anal" about staying in the channel or along their prescribed route. 2. Looking at your arrows for your and the other vessels headings, I can see a possible view that could lead to a misread of your intentions from the ferry's view..... i.e. that you would soon come left to continue down the channel. 3. Once again, there are so many possibilities for their action............... otn |
Ferry encounter
Unless the vessel was following an designated traffic lane, you had right of
way. Argh! Man the guns! Away the boarding party! MMC "Roger Long" wrote in message ... Say, did the right of way rules for commercial passenger vessels change when they became official terrorist targets under the protection of homeland security? The ferry crews in this part of the world have always seemed very competent and courteous to me and I've had a number of professional dealings with them. We were finishing up a day sail today in shifty and increasing winds that shortly after turned into a squall. There is a large anchorage that has a pair of red and greens in it that used to guide the largest vessels up to a long abandoned navy oil depot. It isn't a channel in the normal sense but marks the deepest area in the center. We were close hauled and I was alone on deck with everyone below cleaning and straightening up. One of the little 65 foot ferries was proceeding down the bay through the buoys as if it were a channel. The ferry was going slowly, we were converging, the bearing didn't change. There was plenty of room for a minor correction that would take them astern and I really didn't want to tack. I started looking for a head in the pilot house and couldn't see any faces so I finally luffed up which took some finessing in the shifty conditions as we slowed down and began to lose rudder authority. The ferry passed about 50 feet in front of us and a lady who looked a lot like she might be the captain stuck her head out and studied us intently without waving as if she was trying to read the numbers on the bow. As I sailed on over the next half mile of 20 + foot deep and unobstructed water, I found myself wondering if she could really think that the rule about vessels in a channel and constrained by their draft really applied to her. No question that we would have hit if I hadn't luffed or taken some more dramatic action. She proceeded like she was on autopilot. Just coming up to normal speed or a 10 degree course change early on would have avoided any possibility of contact. This was quite out of character for the outfit. I wonder what she was thinking? -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
Another factor may be the area you sail in. My home port has traffic
lanes marked in 'magenta colour' on the charts. Pleasure boats are supposed to cross them at right angles as quickly as possible. Most people don't...but if a major commercial vessel..such as a post panamax containership comes in...we get out of the way. |
Ferry encounter
I wish my point could point well enough to have come left. I'd win
every race I entered! The easiest action for the ferry to have taken would have been a slight diversion to the middle of the channel. There was not other traffic that would have been a factor. She may have assumed that I would tack to stay in the channel so as to keep at least 20' of water under my keel:) -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
I carry charts and try to be well aware of things like that.
-- Roger Long "Don White" wrote in message ... Another factor may be the area you sail in. My home port has traffic lanes marked in 'magenta colour' on the charts. Pleasure boats are supposed to cross them at right angles as quickly as possible. Most people don't...but if a major commercial vessel..such as a post panamax containership comes in...we get out of the way. |
Ferry encounter
"Jack Dale" wrote in message
... On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 00:23:11 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: On the first and last one cited, I agree. On the traffic separation zone, I don't think it would make a difference. Just because someone is using the correct lane for their course, doesn't give them license to ignore the other rules. That could depend on the application of Rule 10 (j) (j) A vessel of less than 20 meters in length or a sailing vessel shall not impede the safe passage of a power driven vessel following a traffic lane. This would not apply as Roger's chart does not show a TSZ. Jack _________________________________________ Jack Dale ISPA Yachtmaster Offshore Instructor CYA Advanced Cruising Instructor http://www.swiftsuresailing.com _________________________________________ Interesting... There doesn't appear to be any language about size of vessel using the separation zone. I can just imagine a skiff claiming rights. :-) -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
400' ships have status over a sailing vessel in a restricted situation. I
don't know about the Great Lakes, but I've been in an overtaking situation with a tanker in the Pacific Ocean. Being prudent, when we spotted her coming up on the stern, we made ready to change course. However, the tanker changed course and went around us, as they should according to the rules. You're right, just because you have rights doesn't mean being foolish. However, they're not following the rules and should be contacted. What's wrong with hailing them? I don't think this has anything to do with being a rich or ugly American. I'm sure the CG wouldn't be averse to reminding them of their obligations. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Denny" wrote in message oups.com... Having sailed the Great Lakes for some 60 years I have had ample experience with the solid stream of freighters... They don't turn, period... Usually there is not even anyone visible in the bridge windows... I long ago developed the attitude that I will immediately turn away as soon as I see a converging track developing... I am not burning hundreds of dollars an hour of fuel... I can turn on a dime... I like tacking... I am sailing for pleasure... Being ground up underneath a 400 foot cement hauler is not my idea of pleasure... And, likely the person on the bridge (if any) does not speak english and doesn't particularily like 'rich', 'ugly americans'... Just a fact of life for a yachtsman... Just because you think the Colregs say you don't have to turn, doesn't mean you shouldn't... If I were pulling a fish net or dredging, I would ignore the big guy and let him make the quivering explanations in the Admiralty Court as to why he ran someone down... I'm not, so I give way... denny |
Ferry encounter
Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. I looked on the Washington State ferry system web site but couldn't find anything. I've emailed them to ask about it, and I'll post their response when I hear from them. Tom Dacon |
Ferry encounter
"Tom Dacon" wrote in message
... Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. I looked on the Washington State ferry system web site but couldn't find anything. I've emailed them to ask about it, and I'll post their response when I hear from them. Tom Dacon Tom, I've been looking on the CG site also, but can't find anything. But, you never know of course. I know I have to stay a bit further away from military, cruise liners, tankers, etc. But, why the heck would I want to be close to those... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
Here's what I got from the Washington State ferry system. It's an advisory
from the Port of Seattle. It looks like (paraphrasing the relevant paragraph) the Coast Guard has established, for Puget Sound, security zones around larger passenger vessels such as ferries and cruise ships. Vessels should slow to minimum speed while within 500 yards, and mantain at least 100 yards distance unless they have obtained permission to approach. To get permission to approach within the zone, among other things they can contact the patrol or the master of the passenger vessel on VHF 16 or 13. Civil penalties up to $27,500 for violations. Here's the link: http://www.portseattle.org/about/sec...security.shtml When this was being publicized, I imagined that it was nation-wide, but all I know about for sure today is Puget Sound. No doubt the Coast Guard in each jurisdiction has made their own decisions about doing something like this if they felt it was warranted. So this is the situation in Puget Sound anyway - I don't what the situation might be where Roger sails. Regards, Tom Dacon "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Tom Dacon" wrote in message ... Roger, despite what the others have said so far, Don and Tom, there are no special rules that I'm aware of regarding ferries. There are some for approaching large vessels, but I can't see how they would apply to a ferry that can have twice or three times your speed on open water. If there are, I'd love to see a link. I looked on the Washington State ferry system web site but couldn't find anything. I've emailed them to ask about it, and I'll post their response when I hear from them. Tom Dacon Tom, I've been looking on the CG site also, but can't find anything. But, you never know of course. I know I have to stay a bit further away from military, cruise liners, tankers, etc. But, why the heck would I want to be close to those... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
"Tom Dacon" wrote
(snip) Vessels should slow to minimum speed while within 500 yards, and maintain at least 100 yards distance unless they have obtained permission to approach. I don't what the situation might be where Roger sails. Well, we don't have anything similar that I'm aware of. With a 1000 yard wide harbor, it would be chaos it we did. There usually is a boat with a blinking blue light just off the stern of any cruise ships that are in town (room for one only) but I've never seen them chase anyone. There was a lot of amusement a year or so ago when the USCG was escorting the ferries back and forth. I don't know whether it was the laughter or the fuel bills that ended that foolishness. -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... "Tom Dacon" wrote (snip) Vessels should slow to minimum speed while within 500 yards, and maintain at least 100 yards distance unless they have obtained permission to approach. I don't what the situation might be where Roger sails. Well, we don't have anything similar that I'm aware of. With a 1000 yard wide harbor, it would be chaos it we did. There usually is a boat with a blinking blue light just off the stern of any cruise ships that are in town (room for one only) but I've never seen them chase anyone. There was a lot of amusement a year or so ago when the USCG was escorting the ferries back and forth. I don't know whether it was the laughter or the fuel bills that ended that foolishness. -- Roger Long Interesting link. Of course, if the ferry is approaching you, you'll have limited ability to get to the distance requirement. They're talking about ships over 100 feet in length, so that wouldn't hold for the ferries around here. Also, anything that large would be restricted in maneuverability in the channels. They never escorted the ferries here. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
Without knowing all the particulars (i.e., being there) it's hard to tell
who did what to whom. At any rate, my guess is that it was just one of those circumstances we may all run into that's mainly kept in the memory banks for future possible incidents, where we can now think of another possibility of what may happen. "Roger Long" wrote in message ... I wish my point could point well enough to have come left. I'd win every race I entered! The easiest action for the ferry to have taken would have been a slight diversion to the middle of the channel. There was not other traffic that would have been a factor. She may have assumed that I would tack to stay in the channel so as to keep at least 20' of water under my keel:) -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 12:36:09 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: Here is the chart with the ferry (excursion boat would be a more accurate description in this case although it is operated by a ferry line) shown in red and our course in black. I just read rule 9 and I would be curious if anyone would think that it applies to a 6 foot draft vessel near high tide in this case. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Encounter.jpg If she thought you were motorsailing she would have been the stand-on vessel. Only explanation that fits the facts. Hard to judge her emotional state. :o) Mark E. Williams |
Ferry encounter
"Maynard G. Krebbs" wrote in message
... On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 12:36:09 GMT, "Roger Long" wrote: Here is the chart with the ferry (excursion boat would be a more accurate description in this case although it is operated by a ferry line) shown in red and our course in black. I just read rule 9 and I would be curious if anyone would think that it applies to a 6 foot draft vessel near high tide in this case. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Encounter.jpg If she thought you were motorsailing she would have been the stand-on vessel. Only explanation that fits the facts. Hard to judge her emotional state. :o) Mark E. Williams Unfortunately, it's not good enough to think that. One is obligated to avoid a collision, and it doesn't matter if you think you're right and don't. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Ferry encounter
Roger Long wrote:
I wish my point could point well enough to have come left. I'd win every race I entered! The easiest action for the ferry to have taken would have been a slight diversion to the middle of the channel. There was not other traffic that would have been a factor. She may have assumed that I would tack to stay in the channel so as to keep at least 20' of water under my keel:) Roger, It looks to me that the ferry was burdened. I would have sounded 5 short blasts and called the ferry on the radio and asked about the ferry's intentions as soon as I realized that the ferry was not going to mnvre in accordance with the rules. Time permitting of course. Gary |
Ferry encounter
"Gary"
Roger, It looks to me that the ferry was burdened. I would have sounded 5 short blasts and called the ferry on the radio and asked about the ferry's intentions as soon as I realized that the ferry was not going to mnvre in accordance with the rules. Time permitting of course. You must be a powerboater. Short BLASTS? You mean five short little peeps (which I doubt they could have heard), if I could have taken one hand off the wheel in conditions in which the boat had become seriously overpowered due to the wind increasing very rapidly. I was lugging until I could get to the lower traffic zone to reef. I was just holding it together and this was happening too fast to have started a radio exchange, even if I could have spared a hand. Despite the number of people on the boat, I was essentially single handed. If situation awareness counts for anything, the ferry skipper (or skipperette) should have been able to look at the conditions, one person on deck, rail in the water, main eased, and figured that maybe I had my hands full and couldn't be counted on to do any fancy maneuvers. She's actually damn lucky I am a good enough helmsman to have been able to carry a controlled luff under those circumstances. If I'd hit her or taken the rig out coming aback while trying a last minute avoidance of a burdened vessel standing on, you can be damn sure I would have been going after her license. -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
"Roger Long" wrote:
"Gary" Roger, It looks to me that the ferry was burdened. I would have sounded 5 short blasts and called the ferry on the radio and asked about the ferry's intentions as soon as I realized that the ferry was not going to mnvre in accordance with the rules. Time permitting of course. You must be a powerboater. Short BLASTS? You mean five short little peeps (which I doubt they could have heard), if I could have taken one hand off the wheel in conditions in which the boat had become seriously overpowered due to the wind increasing very rapidly. I was lugging until I could get to the lower traffic zone to reef. I was just holding it together and this was happening too fast to have started a radio exchange, even if I could have spared a hand. Despite the number of people on the boat, I was essentially single handed. If situation awareness counts for anything, the ferry skipper (or skipperette) should have been able to look at the conditions, one person on deck, rail in the water, main eased, and figured that maybe I had my hands full and couldn't be counted on to do any fancy maneuvers. She's actually damn lucky I am a good enough helmsman to have been able to carry a controlled luff under those circumstances. If I'd hit her or taken the rig out coming aback while trying a last minute avoidance of a burdened vessel standing on, you can be damn sure I would have been going after her license. I would anyway. Or at least file a complaint. |
Ferry encounter
"Rosalie B." wrote
I would [go after her license] anyway. Or at least file a complaint. Well, I'm sure she (and I only say "she" because it was a female head that stuck out the window to look back at me, could have been a girlfirend, crew, or trainee) didn't get this far in her career without understanding the rules well enough to have been saying to herself, "Yikes, if that idiot had hit me, I wouldn't have a leg to stand on." The caliber of the ferry district crews seems high enough to me (a former consultant to them) that I don't think a complaint and the flurry of paper surrounding it is needed to drive the point home. I may feel different if I see more of this. As a former pilot (well, still one officially but self grounded), I know that we all screw up occasionally, even when the consequences are more endangering to ourselves than a slap on the wrist from the Coast Guard. Since this incident though I've been watching the behavior of other vessels more analytically; also myself. I think there is some basis the idea mentioned here somewhere that electronics have put a lot of people on the water who haven't gotta clue. Loss of the expectation that others will follow the rules changes behavior. The ferry captain may well have been thinking, "This bozo will tack like all the others do." I, in fact, give way to the CBIT vessels with early, clear, course changes 99% of the time because they have a job to do, are on schedules, and I like to handle my boat. Just as I type this, a very plausible explanation occurs to me. I sail a lot and my boat and behaviour could easily be as well known to the ferry captains as they are to me. "She" may well have been thinking, "Oh, it's that guy, he'll tack." Meanwhile, I'm thinking, "There's a professional in that pilothouse, I can count on them to do the right thing." If it had been a 50 foot seaway or a dragger, you can be sure I would have tacked. This is all pointing to something a lot more subtle and complex than knowledge of the rules of the road. -- Roger Long |
Ferry encounter
Roger Long wrote:
"Gary" Roger, It looks to me that the ferry was burdened. I would have sounded 5 short blasts and called the ferry on the radio and asked about the ferry's intentions as soon as I realized that the ferry was not going to mnvre in accordance with the rules. Time permitting of course. You must be a powerboater. Short BLASTS? You mean five short little peeps (which I doubt they could have heard), if I could have taken one hand off the wheel in conditions in which the boat had become seriously overpowered due to the wind increasing very rapidly. I was lugging until I could get to the lower traffic zone to reef. I was just holding it together and this was happening too fast to have started a radio exchange, even if I could have spared a hand. Despite the number of people on the boat, I was essentially single handed. If situation awareness counts for anything, the ferry skipper (or skipperette) should have been able to look at the conditions, one person on deck, rail in the water, main eased, and figured that maybe I had my hands full and couldn't be counted on to do any fancy maneuvers. She's actually damn lucky I am a good enough helmsman to have been able to carry a controlled luff under those circumstances. If I'd hit her or taken the rig out coming aback while trying a last minute avoidance of a burdened vessel standing on, you can be damn sure I would have been going after her license. No I'm not a power boater. Even though the ferry appears to have been the burdened vessel, you are still required by the R of R to go through the steps of indicating you don't understand her movements etc. I keep an air horn and handheld VHF in the cockpit just for that reason. How far ahead of you did the ferry pass? Maybe her appreciation of the situation was different from your. Her ARPA may have indicated a safe CPA astern (one that the ferry was comfortable with) while you were eyeballing it. Gary |
Ferry encounter
"Gary" wrote
What you are saying here is you only adhere to the rules when you want to and the rest of the boats on the water know you do that? What about the rule that requires you to stand on? Maybe you have inadvertently created the confusion by allowing some vessels to pass while demanding your rights with this one? Not at all. I'm quite cognizant of the need for the stand on vessel to behave in a predictable fashion. Once a situation has developed to the point that the burdened vessel needs to make a correction in course I religiously go straight and steady. When I give way to the ferries, I do it well in advance of it's becoming a crossing situation and do it with a clear and often exaggerated course change to make my intentions clear. This is done well in advance of it becoming an encounter. Thinking about it further, I probably do this far enough outside their zone of concern that I kind of doubt that the notice. After all, I know exactly what their route is likely to be. Still, the point about creating confusion is an interesting one. I see it more in terms of everyone's aggregate behavior though. Maybe it would be better if everyone insisted on their right of way. In a small busy harbor, though, you are often burdened and stand on at the same time to different vessels. -- Roger Long |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com