High gas prices have created a new group of people -
"pump grumblers."
When pumping our high priced gas, we grumble words of
resentment, while feeling powerless. We need gas, so
we pay the price. Standing as a individual we are
powerless, but together our voices would be heard.
America is a strong, independent country.
When John Kennedy proposed we put a man on the moon, a
goal and time line was set. American determination
made it happen. Let's apply the same initiative to
independence of oil through alternative energy
research and use. We already have brilliant minds who
are making great strides towards this goal.
Demand that the President stand up for us.
Ask him to support Alternative energy to free us from
oil dependence,
starting today. Millions of letters cannot be ignored.

Write a paper letter before July 4 to the President.
Urge friends and family to do the same.
President Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Down Load a letter at
http://oilindependenceday2006.com/
Pass this on or add a link to your web page.
From:
Linda

Linda wrote:
[spam deleted]
From:
Linda

i really enjoy writing non-sense too and posting it to newsgroups that
don't have anything to do with it, please read on for my most excellent
meaningless post that has nothing to say except what you are reading
now which is pretty much nothing except for words that go on and on and
string together in a long series of meaningless ideas that do nothing
but take up space on the board and annoy anyone who tries to read them.
it's so meaningless, in fact, that i don't know why you continue to
read these words, i wouldn't if i were you, even writing them is
annoying me, but you know it just seems like the right thing to do to
keep saying crap that doesn't mean anything in response to empty
moronic crap that was posted to one of my favorite newsgroups. am i
helping or hurting the situation, who knows, i'm sure such meaningless
non-sense as this can't hurt too much, but i can't see how it helps
either, it's not like someone who posts annoying empty words to an
inappropriate newsgroup like Linda here is going to stop just because i
post equally annoying and useless text back at her. i'm sure she isn't
even reading it, she just posted it .. fire and forget, hoping that her
empty words will land on ears that give them meaning, which i may be
doing right now by justifying them with any kind of response at all,
but i feel compelled to write back anyway since her post is like a spot
on the beautiful canvas that is rec.boats.cruising. if she spreads out
her senseless garbage wide and far enough she can play the percentages
and hope that her empty words will trigger a response, which it has, in
me! though not the intended response of writing the president, it has,
instead, make me really dislike the name Linda at least for today, and
if anything makes me want to support the President just out of spite.
maybe if we all post totally meaningless garbage like this eventually
the newsgroup will be so overloaded with useless, non-sailing related
stupid ass crap that we won't even be able to find the good posts, that
seems to be what is happening over on www.ssca.org at the moment, where
a relentless spammer/psycho moron keeps posting endless amounts of
garbage to what used to be a very good forum for talking with other
sailors. blah blah blah blah blah, non-sense crap crap crap, i can't
even think of new ways to express nothing at all, meaningless
emptiness, lack of quality, senseless void words spewing forth from an
expansive abyss. i'm at a loss to continue on! lol. these senseless
posts are like adding water to fine wine, diluting it and making it
into something junky and lame, thinning out the fine quality that is
our beautiful newsgroup rec.boats.cruising, and i feel just terrible
for making it even worse by responding to it. i hope you have enjoyed
my most excellent meaningless post, in response to an equally annoying
inappropriate post in a terrific newsgroup of cruisers. blah blah
blah, making noise and hiding the signal, blah blah blah

LOL! I read (almost) every word.

Of course, if I was a powerboater burning $60.00 an hour, I might see
the relavance. Banning recreational powerboating is the kind of idea
bound to crop up in any discussion of the kind of conservation that
would get prices back to where we pay no more attention to the cost of
the fuel than the cost of the air that burns it.

(I'm not advocating such a ban so, save your flames.)

--

Roger Long

Gas is cheaper in 2006 than it was in 1965, when it was 50cUS/US gallon.

"What? Are you CRAZY?!!"

Nope, it's true. In 1965, a brand new full-size American car was about
1/10th of the price of a nearly-full-size American minicar, today. Gold,
whether the Federal Reserve bankers like it or not, the value standard
for the planet, was even LESS than 1/10th of its price, today. Using
those two as a "value reference", the price of 50 cent gas should be 5 or
6 US dollars a US gallon! So, as it's only about half that price, gas is
actually HALF the price it was in 1965, against the price of the car it
goes in or against the value standard of the planet.

What DOES continue to change is the value of the American Dollar, quietly
under constant devaluation to offset the interest on the Federal Debt,
caused by decades of handing out political payoffs of funds we do not
have from the Federal printing presses at The Mint:
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
Every person in your family is born owing $US28,056...as of the moment I
typed this, but it has gone up since I sent it and you read it, about
1.76 Billion (with the B) per day. Click on the links on the webpage.
I've been watching this webpage cause our national disintegration for
years and years. Here, this Java-based realtime clock is more fun to
watch:
http://www.toptips.com/debtclock.html
The realtime "price" of gas/diesel continues to drop this afternoon as
the value of the microdollars in your pocket continue to decline. It
isn't rocket science to see what's happening. You just recently noticed
the effects of devaluation.

The other problem in your post is your reference to John Kennedy sending
live humans to the moon. Just like the 9-11 Commission Report, that was,
too, a lie. Humans cannot withstand the intense radiation in an
unshielded little spacecraft passing through the Van Allen Radiation
Belts that surround this and every other planet. The pictures of the
men-on-the-moon was a Hollywood production done on a big soundstage of
the Federal gummit.

Remember that movie they showed you of what the Earth looked like taken
from the Moon, showing the big blue marble? A few years ago, the REST of
the movie escaped NASA to show how it was done. As the "show" ended the
idiot astronauts forgot to cut off the tape recorder. When they turned
the lights back on in the spacecraft, you could see the blue surface of
the planet out the ROUND porthole as they removed the black mask from
around it, put there for the "show". Now, with the lights back on, you
can also see the bulkhead and stuff around the porthole you couldn't see
in the blackout of the "show" for TV. They were in Earth orbit over the
ocean during the taping....(c; Too funny.

Since I typed the toptips.com debt clock in this message, that java clock
has screwed up over $52M as I type this line.

Gas has gotten cheaper as the money has gotten WORTHLESS.




"Linda" wrote in news:1150636422.114486.34240
@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

High gas prices have created a new group of people -
"pump grumblers."
When pumping our high priced gas, we grumble words of
resentment, while feeling powerless. We need gas, so
we pay the price. Standing as a individual we are
powerless, but together our voices would be heard.
America is a strong, independent country.
When John Kennedy proposed we put a man on the moon, a
goal and time line was set. American determination
made it happen. Let's apply the same initiative to
independence of oil through alternative energy
research and use. We already have brilliant minds who
are making great strides towards this goal.
Demand that the President stand up for us.
Ask him to support Alternative energy to free us from
oil dependence,
starting today. Millions of letters cannot be ignored.

In article ,
says...
Gas is cheaper in 2006 than it was in 1965, when it was 50cUS/US gallon.

"What? Are you CRAZY?!!"
SNIP
Remember that movie they showed you of what the Earth looked like taken
from the Moon, showing the big blue marble? A few years ago, the REST of
the movie escaped NASA to show how it was done. As the "show" ended the
idiot astronauts forgot to cut off the tape recorder. When they turned
the lights back on in the spacecraft, you could see the blue surface of
the planet out the ROUND porthole as they removed the black mask from
around it, put there for the "show". Now, with the lights back on, you
can also see the bulkhead and stuff around the porthole you couldn't see
in the blackout of the "show" for TV. They were in Earth orbit over the
ocean during the taping....(c; Too funny.


LOL! Thanks for the laughable hypothesis. It's a bit contradictory,
though. Any astronauts orbiting sufficiently high to take photos
showing the whole earth would be orbiting right in the middle of the
Van Allen Belts! Wouldn't that fog your film!

Even Van Allen himself doesn't think the belts present a great risk
to the astronauts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/waw/mad/mad19.html

SNIP

Mark Borgerson

Mark Borgerson mborgerson.at.comcast.net wrote in
.net:

LOL! Thanks for the laughable hypothesis. It's a bit contradictory,
though. Any astronauts orbiting sufficiently high to take photos
showing the whole earth would be orbiting right in the middle of the
Van Allen Belts! Wouldn't that fog your film!



The picture was just a round porthole picture of the OCEAN below, not the
whole earth....

Oops, silly Larry... here's the pix of the plane wreckage in the
Pentagon:
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
yawn

Oh yea, if you want to compare dollars to dollars, inflation-wise,
check out these calculators:
http://www1.jsc.nasa.gov/bu2/inflate.html

Gasoline is still way cheap. Note what people pay per gallon for
bottled drinking water!

In article ,
says...
Mark Borgerson mborgerson.at.comcast.net wrote in
.net:

LOL! Thanks for the laughable hypothesis. It's a bit contradictory,


Then there's that little problem of why there was no indication of any kind
of blast from the LEM's rocket directly under the LEM in the "dust" that
made such an impression when an astronaut stepped into it. The surface was
undisturbed under the LEM when it should have looked like someone took a
high pressure hose to it!

They wouldn't lie to us, would they? After all, a 737 airliner went right
through a 16' diameter hole in the Pentagon and vanished on 9/11!


Well, you're only off by 20. I guess that's close enough for some
people!. ;-)



Mark Borgerson

"Keith" wrote in
oups.com:

http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm


Where? There's no plane in those pictures.

over 9000# of body parts, thousands of pounds of luggage and freight,
9000 gallons of kerosene that would have burned for DAYS, not exploded in
a fireball.

Most of the airplane, including the wings, engines, tail assy, and the
passenger compartment would have been left OUT ON THE LAWN as the wings
would have extended for hundreds of feet from the hole.

Bull****....no airliner hit the Pentagon....A Predator drone is the size
of the hole and has those wheels in the picture....

Oh, look at a 737 turbofan engine. You can nearly stand up in the
intake. It's made of TITANIUM that melts at some godawful temperature
kerosene cannot attain. Those engines would have been UNSCATHED OUT
THERE ON THE LAWN AND IT ALL WAS WAY TOO HEAVY FOR THE FEW PEOPLE TRYING
TO HIDE THE EVIDENCE TO CARRY OFF without a crane and several tractor
trailers.

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html

Oh, hell, go to Google and put "9-11 Pentagon Pictures" into the search
engine. There's too many to list here....