Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.fan.frank-zappa,wi.general
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is:
William Cmelak N9340 Pickerel Creek Rd Pearson, WI 54462-8140 Of course, what the Hoodoo Troll (450 lbs. of greasy William "Fat Bill" Cmelak of Pearson, WI) doesn't bother to explain is that he is clearly in violation of Florida's anti-stalking laws. A veteran detective who was investigating Cmelak even called him a "sick ****" because of the threats that he posted a year ago to run over motorcyclists during Bike Week and to sodomize another man. And he's still around, 13 months later, stalking and trolling and spamming newsgroups. For more information on this pervert who lives in a mobile home in the woods of Wisconsin and stalks 24/7 go to http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Cmelak.htm ~~~ Florida Stalking Law Section 784.048 Stalking; Definitions; Penalties (1) As used in this section, the term: (a) "Harass" means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such person and serves no legitimate purpose. (b) "Course of conduct" means a pattern a conduct composed of series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "corse of conduct". Such constitutionally protected activity includes picketing or other organized protests. (c)"Credible threat" means a threat made with the intent to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety. The threat must be against the life of, or a threat to cause bodily injury to, a person. (2) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree. (3) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person, and makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury, commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. (4) Any person who, after an injunction fro protection against violence pursuant to s. 784.046, or an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to s. 741.30, or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the subject person that person's property, knowingly, willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a fleony of the third degree. (5) Any person who willfully, maciliously, and repeatedly follows or harasses a minor under 16 years of age commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. (6) Any law enforcement officer may arrest, without a warrant, any person he or she has probable cause to believe has violated the provisions of this section |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.fan.frank-zappa,wi.general
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dear poster,
Your words........... "Moffitt Corporation in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. What a ****-hole that must be to allow an abject loser like him to post...." Sounds as though your statment would also qualify as, "... liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites..." Better watch out, the guy you do not like may just sue you along with the Moffitt Corp. I think the Moffitt Corp may very well have much deeper pockets and meaner attorneys than you. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.fan.frank-zappa,wi.general
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com, Bob says...
dear poster, Your words........... "Moffitt Corporation in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. What a ****-hole that must be to allow an abject loser like him to post...." Sounds as though your statment would also qualify as, "... liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites..." Better watch out, the guy you do not like may just sue you along with the Moffitt Corp. I think the Moffitt Corp may very well have much deeper pockets and meaner attorneys than you. Say Bob, Do you know the difference between a website and usenet? The Sears corporate owners sucks dicks. Now... Let them sue me... ****ing Retard! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Mar 2006 16:16:28 -0800, "Bob" wrote:
dear poster, Your words........... "Moffitt Corporation in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. What a ****-hole that must be to allow an abject loser like him to post...." Sounds as though your statment would also qualify as, "... liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites..." Better watch out, the guy you do not like may just sue you along with the Moffitt Corp. I think the Moffitt Corp may very well have much deeper pockets and meaner attorneys than you. Please provide the credentials which allows you to present yourself as a qualified ****house lawyer, because, as your comment proves, your reasoning is so faulty as to be beyond laughable. View the verifiable data I present within my original document. Notice the originating domain data I provide and then search for and view the many hundreds of usenet messages posted to usenet by dozens of aliases from that Moffitt domain. Notice how many of the messages posted to usenet from that Moffitt domain contain harassing and abusive content targeting numerous victims. After you have followed my suggestions above, I will gladly submit to you or any court of law wishing to judge a legal case of Moffitt and/or the chicken**** sociopath behind those hundreds of denigrating and abusive usenet messages against me for defamatory intent. If, in America, I cannot present factual data clearly identifying an individual who repeatedly posts harassing content targeting numerous other individuals while hiding behind dozens of aliases and the messages originate from the computers and/or computer network of a commercial entity who had previously received complaints about the abuse from various victims of it, then we as a society are in far worse condition than any news report may portend. If my statement that, "Moffitt Corporation in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. What a ****-hole that must be to allow an abject loser like him to post...", causes the initiation of a legal suit by either entity for damages by it, then, bring it on because I have volumes of archival data to argue my side of the story. The truth, as I present it, will prevail. -- Verifiable data regarding "PigSty PirateJohn" Weasely Gilmer III who initiates and perpetuates, yet refuses to take responsibility for, internet and real life abuse: John Wesley Gilmer III, 12526 Agatite Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32258; (904) 247-3543 or (904) 652-7222 or (904) 268-5220 or (904) 673-0932; "I'm smarter, bigger, stronger, and a lot meaner than you are. You also won't be the first person that I didn't like who I had to kill. Legally." -- john wesley gilmer III; john wesley gilmer III is, of course, "el Presidente, Atlantic Beach Vintage Motorcycle Club, www.ABVMC.com" |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hoodoo wrote:
If my statement that, "Moffitt Corporation in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. What a ****-hole that must be to allow an abject loser like him to post...", causes the initiation of a legal suit by either entity for damages by it, then, bring it on because I have volumes of archival data to argue my side of the story. The truth, as I present it, will prevail. Dear Hoodoo, I hope what I am about to say will help you solve your problem. Many people mistakenly confuse "fact" and "opinion." This may create a great many problems. Lets test your skill level. For example, which is a fact and which is an opinion: A) Today is another wonderful example of Gods creations. B) There is a 50% scattered overcast at 1500' / winds 020 degrees 20knts/ 58 degreesF. Now I suggest that you apply that concept to your words. The words "****-hole...abject loser..." are not facts. Those words are only your opinion. What fact do you have to support your opinion? The problem is that most people lack the skill and vocabulary to describe human behavior accurately. As a result folks will spew opinions thinking they are describing facts. What happens when people use opinions believing them facts? In a bar they get punched, in a marriage they get divorced and don't get to see their kids, and in court they are found guilty....of slander and required to pay court costs. Why... ? Opinions are not facts. I hope you have facts that are facts and not simply an opinion. If that is the case what you say will simply appear to others as the rantings of an under-educated, self indulgent, and very angry person. Hugs and kisses my friend, My God bless you. Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
off-topic - possible legislation in New Jersey: persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites | General | |||
So where is...................... | General |