Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peggie Hall wrote:
, In YOUR area...but not in all. But even storm drains that do empty directly into the ocean instead of a sewer line do so through pipes that terminate at least 3 miles offshore (that wasn't always true, but is in MOST places now), ....Not likely which is also the minimum distance from shore to legally dump a tank at sea. So how is dumping a tank down a storm drain that terminates 3 miles offshore any worse for the environment than dumping it at sea barely 3 miles offshore? Yours is just one more example of a "knee jerk" emotional reaction without any rational reasoning behind it. First I will detail my "rational reasoning" for anyone who still can't grasp it; Knee-jerk to follow.. Ever hear of the L.A. River? It is a primary storm drain for the Los Angeles basin. Serving,what, 8 or 10 million people? And fed by the storm runoff of thousands of street corners etc. This is typical of systems statewide and beyond. Rarely will you see storm drains discharge to an offshore diffuser. The exception being small treatment districts with large capacity for runoff...nearly non existant. As soon as the treatment facilities reach capacity during a storm, from their fractional share of run-off, they discharge directly to the canals,etc., to prevent the destruction of the pipelines that are meant to carry waste only..This flows directly into the harbors, river mouths, and beach outfalls. One of the reasons for this is quite simple...Runoff carries with it a staggering volume of solid waste and debris, from trees to refrigerators, trash to telivisions...literally..treatment plants can't process it, pipelines can't pass it, pumps can't move it. The only way to deliver the liquid portion via lift stations and pipelines, is to remove the solids by building large acreage catch- basins to collect it in.. A house on a 35' by 65' or 70' lot runs over 700k (median). Now guess how much land is going to be set aside for occasional use during storms...just above nil. Treated sewage is easily transported offshore, storm drain runoff simply takes the paths of least reistance to the sea. How do I know this? 5 years diving for the USN Underwater Construction Teams, three more for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory/Ocean Ops and a couple more on contract projects. We built, repaired, extended, and inspected sewer outfalls and diffusers all over the world, among other things. Municipalities deliver treated waste offshore because they are required to, they let runoff take its course because they don't have the funds or resources to do otherwise, and for the most part have no regulations requiring offshore delivery...yet. So I will say it again, nothing should be sent down a storm drain besides water, yes, animal waste, trash, oil from the roadways etc. will still end up in the system but that's no reason for people to contribute to the muck... If your boat was taking on water, you wouldn't shrug your shoulders, say it was going to sink anyway, then turn on a garden hose to help fill it... We're supposed to be smarter than that... The only knee-jerk reactions I have are from the cramps caused by dysentery contracted through exposure to contaminated runoff in the harbor... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
35s5 Not vacuum bagged! | ASA |