Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Cox wrote:
Yes, this is an old thread coming back to life... [snip] Roger Long and several others then made very convincing arguments that diesel would be the best fuel for this product. Well, my partner has found an appropriate diesel motor and electric motor/generator. We are putting together a test stand now and should get some real-world data soon. My partner insists that lubrication is not a problem at any angle of heel, but that is one thing we'll be taking a hard look at. There are a couple of major variables that I'm still unclear on: how it will get fuel and where it will be located. For fuel, I'm wondering if it would be preferable to have its own fuel tank or to connect to the main fuel system. For location, it could be a stand-alone unit that you put on deck to operate, or a built-in unit that could operate without getting in the way. Clearly these two issues are inter-related. My original idea was to make it stand-alone with its own fuel tank. By using a small fuel pump, we can locate the fuel tank beside the motor instead of on top like most generators. This would make for a low-profile package that would be less intrusive than a typical generator, but you'd still have one more thing on deck to trip over. So, if you were to put such a system on your boat, what would you prefer? i think this is a good idea. in battery based electrical systems there has always been a giant gap that needs to be filled in the area of battery charging with fuel based generators. with solar panels you get a small charge going into your bank, the same with wind generation, usually upwards to 200 or 300 watts if you are extremely fortunate. but if you want to use a fuel based system you've always had to step up to suddenly wasting incredible amounts of fuel to run an alternator that is very inefficient at charging batteries for the amount of fuel wasted doing it, and there's not been a generator that is down in the "few hundred watt" range that would make better use of fuel. battery banks can only accept a certain amount of power, and a 5000 watt generator might as well be a 500 watt generator because you can't charge the batteries any faster than using a few hundred watts anyway, so you're just wasting energy for nothing. nobody has ever bothered to make and sell an inexpensive small diesel generator designed to charge a battery bank, at least not that i've ever seen. cruisers are interested in the measurement "battery bank watt hours created per liter of fuel", and i'm not aware of any manufacturer that has ever thought about it that way. most generator makers just think of "watts generated per liter", which isn't the same thing at all. so i think this is a great idea for a product, one that's been needed for a long time. a fuel based battery charger, especially great in diesel, that will not make a pile of noise, won't generate more than a few hundred watts of power, and efficiently turns fuel into battery charge. what's not to like about that. i would think that hooking it into the fuel line for the engine's fuel tank would be the preferred way, but why not make the external tank an option ? that way you can decide for yourself when you buy one if you want the tank or if you want a piece of fuel line and a T adapter. diesel is definitely the way to go, storage of gasoline is a problem. it would be nice if it used fuel filters that you can get at the same time as the ones for your marine engine without special ordering. and also remote start so you can mount the starter switch where ever you want it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to Start an Outboard Motor Without Actually Starting It? | General | |||
Diesel starting problems | Cruising | |||
yanmar -ysb 1974 engine- poor starting | Cruising |