![]() |
Hi there!
Let start with... Len is completely right. Forget this stuff about autopilots, windvanes, etc... that`s all icing that can be added later. The most important thing that you cannot change is your hull, and second is your layout (changeable, but at considerable expense). Then there`s your rig. Big question... where do you want to sail, and why. High latitude and low latitude boats are completely different animals, and very few vessels suit both roles. If you want to circumnavigate, based on what conditions do you chose this? If you want a rapid circumnavigation then you should be following the Dashew world... very fast boats... but not my definition of fun. If you want to cruise in comfort and you choose your weather windows well, staying in lower latitudes, there are a lot of boats that will give you this. If you want to see higher latitudes such as Chile, Argentina, northern Canada, etc... fewer boats suit these needs. In Puerto Williams, Chile and Ushuaia, Argentina, most of the vessels you see will be metal. But surprisingly, there are two very well founded ferro-cement vessels that do fine in Ushuaia. You just have to know what you want, why and how to take care of it. Know your vessel`s limitations and respect them. That`s the key. The deck salon/pilothouse world is a controversial one and again, it depends on what you want. Yes, this vessel will be your home, so you want to be comfortable in it. But remember, if you want to circumnavigate, you have some big oceans to cross and once you`re out there, you`re out there. Too much open space and you`ll be tossed around like a salad. And it hurts. Furthermore, the larger the vessel, the bigger the systems, the more maintenance, the more expense, and the more muscle needed to move it. There are times I envy the guy in the 34 footer. One very important thing to remember... buy your boat based on her hull, the material she`s constructed from, the interior layout, and the material used for the interior. And of course your rig. As I said, the rest is icing. Hopefully, you`ll install the other bits and pieces yourself. If not, get good manuals and take the time to following everything throughout the boat. Things will break. You will fix them. And you will learn in the process. Rick, there are a lot of opinions out there. Go sailing. |
akcarlos wrote:
my point was that you can have a larger yacht and sail it quite well short crewed without having lots of modern toys like roller furling, electric winches etc . True enough, but apparently you also forgot that "Spray" was a very old wooden boat ballasted with loose rocks, and that while Slocum did manage to sail around the world in her, he was also lost at sea in her. Modern gear is better. It isn't necessary, of course, but much of it (if intelligently chosen & properly installed) makes life while sailing/cruising SAFER as well as more comfortable. Fresh Breezes- Doug "Throw A Brick At A Luddite Today" King |
You know there=B4s all kinds out here and it depends on what YOU want
and WHERE. I=B4m currently sailing in the Beagle Channel. One couple we sail alongside has a lovely steel vessel, 38=B4, they built themselves. Cutter-rig, 18HP diesel. Sounds a little underpowered, but they=B4ve been out for 18 years. Everything is manual except for the furling headsails. They get everywhere they need to go and don=B4t spend all of their time making repairs. We have two ferro-cement sailboats down here that prove the fact that good construction can do alot. The average =A8pleasure=A8 vessel (lots of charters down here that don=B4t count) is probably between 45 and 55 feet. But remember, this is an extreme environment and high-latitude vessels are a tad different from their tropical counterparts. Modern equipment is great, but things can freeze up down here. The lanolin-based greases solidify as our friend aboard Sula discovered. I think most people down here in the extreme south like modern, electric when possible, but with a good manual override. When you want to bring in that sail or reef, you may want to do it quickly. But if it breaks, you want to be able to handle it easily. On a transocean passage it=B4s not much different. If you get hit in a squall, you don`t want to spend your precious energy messing about. Just get the sails reefed and hunker down. |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:05:25 -0400, DSK wrote:
Modern gear is better. It isn't necessary, of course, but much of it (if intelligently chosen & properly installed) makes life while sailing/cruising SAFER as well as more comfortable. Absolutely. Slocum probably didn't have lifelines, but probably *did* rig preventers, etc. I have no argument against modern equipment: modern materials (Spectra, carbon fibre, etc.) are clearly superior in almost all respects excepting price G. But there are multiple cut-offs, in my opinion, between modern and useful and modern and (potentially) dangerous gear and ideas in the bluewater yacht world. One such break-point, for me, are assistive devices like electric winches or windlasses: if you are older and/or weaker and/or short-handed, and the only way you can handle that big beautiful boat is via such devices, you are pretty well stuck if they break. You want options in sailing, and not bringing the entire contents of a modern condo with you on a voyage is easier than having to get a bigger boat with bigger gear to run it. I am rather more distressed, if not surprised, at the lack of basic seamanship in said bigger boats than I am worried at expensive and possibly superfluous gear that breaks. We hear more and more of GPS-piloted boats running onto reefs, of crew unable to stop the boat to do a MOB, with subsequent loss of life, of bozos with zero knowledge yakking to their fellow bozos on VHF, etc. Watching the news last night, for instance, I saw several shots of nice big yachts in (presumably) the Florida Keys, riding out Hurricane Rita at anchor. Fair enough. But under what part of basic seamanship do you leave a foresail on a roller-furler or a mainsail on a boom (in one instance unlashed and with the sail cover already shredding and straining the rode)? This month's Ocean Navigator has a "future of voyaging" section which is in parts a bit pessimistic in this way: it's not terrorism or high fuel prices that will cut back on voyaging, it's the unwillingness of a lot of cruisers to learn the basics of navigation and boat-handling because they are focused on the gleaming saloon or the wonderful washer/dryer in the forepeak...G R. |
On 20 Sep 2005 14:04:37 -0700, "ASG" wrote:
You know there´s all kinds out here and it depends on what YOU want and WHERE. snip I think most people down here in the extreme south like modern, electric when possible, but with a good manual override. When you want to bring in that sail or reef, you may want to do it quickly. But if it breaks, you want to be able to handle it easily. Exactly. Thanks for the "out there" perspective. R. |
Modern gear is better. It isn't necessary, of course, but much of it (if
intelligently chosen & properly installed) makes life while sailing/cruising SAFER as well as more comfortable. rhys wrote: Absolutely. Slocum probably didn't have lifelines, but probably *did* rig preventers, etc. The ironic thing about Slocum is that his boat was an old-fashioned anachronism, backwards to the point of comedy, even at the time he was sailing it. And he did it that way because he couldn't afford better... if he hadn't been flat broke, he wouldn't have gone on his solo voyage. I have no argument against modern equipment: modern materials (Spectra, carbon fibre, etc.) are clearly superior in almost all respects excepting price G. But there are multiple cut-offs, in my opinion, between modern and useful and modern and (potentially) dangerous gear and ideas in the bluewater yacht world. Well, don't blur the line between the gear & it's potential, and the actual use to which many people put it. ... One such break-point, for me, are assistive devices like electric winches or windlasses: if you are older and/or weaker and/or short-handed, and the only way you can handle that big beautiful boat is via such devices, you are pretty well stuck if they break. Yep- and unless you have the technical knowledge to maintain them well, they will break constantly. Another bit of irony, if you *do* have that knowledge then you can probably fix it yourself as well. In this hi-tech age, it's still good advice IMHO to not have anything on your cruising boat that you can't fix yourself. And it's a still a very achievable goal. I am rather more distressed, if not surprised, at the lack of basic seamanship in said bigger boats than I am worried at expensive and possibly superfluous gear that breaks. We hear more and more of GPS-piloted boats running onto reefs, of crew unable to stop the boat to do a MOB, with subsequent loss of life, of bozos with zero knowledge yakking to their fellow bozos on VHF, etc. Right, but you seem to want to blame it on the VHF, the GPS, the autopilot, etc etc. This is like blaming forks & spoons for obesity. The real problem here is one of cultural relativity... when we go cruising we want to "get away from it all" but many try to take it all with them... including their consumer-based cultural values. Those of us who plan our lives with a bit of common sense don't fare so poorly! Watching the news last night, for instance, I saw several shots of nice big yachts in (presumably) the Florida Keys, riding out Hurricane Rita at anchor. Fair enough. But under what part of basic seamanship do you leave a foresail on a roller-furler or a mainsail on a boom (in one instance unlashed and with the sail cover already shredding and straining the rode)? Doesn't bother me a bit, except that they drive up insurance rates for the rest of us. This month's Ocean Navigator has a "future of voyaging" section which is in parts a bit pessimistic in this way: it's not terrorism or high fuel prices that will cut back on voyaging, it's the unwillingness of a lot of cruisers to learn the basics of navigation and boat-handling because they are focused on the gleaming saloon or the wonderful washer/dryer in the forepeak...G A regular poster here had an answer for that, can't remember the exact phrase. Something to the effect of "If you think learning to navigate is boring, just imagine how exciting it is to hit the rocks!" Don't worry, a lot of these boats will be for sale cheap. Lack of interest will bring down marina prices too. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
In article , DSK
wrote: A technologist would express a 'blue water' boat as designed with all critical components specified with a safety factor of 4 or more; a coastal boat @ 3, a 'production' coastal boat @ 2. What I mean by safety factor is the deduction of stress imparted to a structure such as having a stainless steel component with 90,000 psi ultimate properties and designing the *function* at 22,500 psi applied stress ..... for a safety factor of 4. If you discuss such with the reknown designers of 'blue water' boats they will relate that they do design with such a 4X safety factor, more if the boat is going to the 'high latitudes'. They will also give you a lighterweight coastal design of the exact same size, shape & configuration but at SF of 3, or you can buy a 'production' boat that sometimes approaches SF of 2. |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:10:41 -0400, rhys wrote:
One such break-point, for me, are assistive devices like electric winches or windlasses: if you are older and/or weaker and/or short-handed, and the only way you can handle that big beautiful boat is via such devices, you are pretty well stuck if they break. Unless you have a satisfactory backup plan, like taking longer to do the job, or taking other steps to make it easier. All of those hauling jobs can be accomplished slowly with a block and tackle, but it's hardly an enjoyable way to do it. I don't have a windlass, electric or otherwise, but there are certainly days when I wouldn't mind a little help. Ryk |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:42:21 -0400, Ryk
wrote: Unless you have a satisfactory backup plan, like taking longer to do the job, or taking other steps to make it easier. All of those hauling jobs can be accomplished slowly with a block and tackle, but it's hardly an enjoyable way to do it. That depends. If you are trying to coastal cruise in a two-week vacation window, more power...literally...to you. If you are passage-making, wherein you combine longish trips with longish anchoring-out, you might want both the security of the manual "old-school" options, not to mention the needed exercise. It used to be noted that a lot of cruising couples had massive backs and shoulders from winch-work, and skinny little legs from little more strain than bracing themselves in a cockpit. These days, of course, you just install a marinized folding exercise bike in the saloon as your automatic bilge pumps whirr...G I don't have a windlass, electric or otherwise, but there are certainly days when I wouldn't mind a little help. And I wouldn't begrudge it to you. But I would suggest a manual windlass, or even a come-along/handy-billy, just for the exercise in a Great Lakes type of situation. It's not the electric gear I find problematic in a blue-water (as per the original poster) situation; it's the exclusive reliance on electric gear. For the record, I like stuff like spring-wound starter motors and windvanes, as well...but I'm no Luddite, just prudent, I hope. R. |
Rhys makes an important point here... It=B4s fine to have the toys to
make things a little easier, but without the routine exercise to keep the muscles working, (not to mention the mind), you won=B4t have it when you really need it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com