Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let us consider relative risks of boating things. We all know of
accidents caused by keels falling off external keeled sailboats, if not, google Mike Plant. Yet, I have never heard of an accident caused by blisters. This means that external keels are far far more dangerous than even the worst case of blisters. So, should I reject all boats with external keels? Actually, I would. I have never heard of anybody being adversley affected by blisters while they were on the water. Considering that many people here who would not have a boat with blisters actually sail even when they are near thunder storms, you have to wonder about their perception of relative risk. The risk of lightning strike even without thunderstorms is probably thousnads of times higfher than being affected by blisters. I have heard of prop shaft breakage sinking boats but have never keard of problems from blisters while on the water. Considering the relative risk of blisters causing problems, I have to conclude the risk is relatively non-existant. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
260 Defiance, not that dissimilar to a Parker | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
The future of yacht design - 10 myths scotched | ASA |