Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am learning celestial and found in the "abandoned gear" bin at my
club a copy of the 1983 Nautical Almanac, produced by both the UK and US Hydrographical offices (or equivalents). As I read my celestial nav books, this publication is referenced frequently, as are the HO 229 and other sets of government produced tables. My question is this: For the purposes of teaching myself sight reductions, the math aspects and accuracy with a sextant (I have a new Astra IIIB), do I need a *current* Nautical Almanac? It strikes me that if I rule out lunar cycles and the very small changes of the precession of the equinoxes, the data of 22 years ago on the same dates isn't going to be widely variant. Or am I missing something and should I order the 2006 edition immediately so I can do land-based reductions all winter and be competant for the spring? R. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nice nautical gift store...... | General | |||
CAPT LOU'S TOP WEIRD NAUTICAL NEWS STORIES IN 2004 | Cruising | |||
Hear "Nautical Talk Radio" - Sailing to the Med, Red, & Dead Seas | Cruising | |||
The Bush Administration Wants Your Almanacs | General | |||
nautical almanac | ASA |