Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in : But has the ITU changed the treaty? Nothing can happen until then. Doug, k3qt Long time ago. ARRL did what it could to prevent ITU from changing its mind, but common sense prevailed. Code hasn't been an ITU requirement in years. ARRL pulled out all the stops to prevent ham radio from having a new flood of new hams without code on the old codgers' HF bands. Now, we need to get rid of this stupid caste system and get down to ONE license with all frequencies available to ALL, without CODE SUBBANDS, which I predict are the next on the chopping block! USA hams may be heard from 14.100-14.150 on SSB before I die! What a concept....joining the rest of the world on this precious slice of frequencies....all on PHONE. -- Larry Yea! Welcome to the next generation of CB. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ham Radio Licenses | Electronics | |||
Code Flags | ASA | |||
Ignorant Dupes | ASA |