Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Don White
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Me wrote:
In article ,
"Mungo Bulge" wrote:


I'll get there again sooner or latter. Maybe on my way back from Lat
69.4 N Long 132.96 W



Over playing with he Canuks, are you? Just make sure you get out befor
the Ice closes in.......


Me


Or is that off the northern coast of Alaska? We'll claim it for Canada
anyway.
  #52   Report Post  
Mungo Bulge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't mind the ice and cold, its the fact that I have to ask
permission to go out side in the winter that bugs me.
"Me" wrote in message
...
| In article ,
| "Mungo Bulge" wrote:
|
| I'll get there again sooner or latter. Maybe on my way back from
Lat
| 69.4 N Long 132.96 W
|
| Over playing with he Canuks, are you? Just make sure you get out
befor
| the Ice closes in.......
|
|
| Me


  #53   Report Post  
Jim Richardson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:06:47 GMT,
Bruce in Alaska wrote:
In article ,
Brian Whatcott wrote:

Oh, I feel such a dud, not even knowing trhat your anonymous buddy is
in fact a big man on the radio waves in Alaska.

Oh, I feel so bad.
Still, I *can* spell. Does that count?
:-)

Brian W


and what makes you thnk he is "My Buddy"....... I just happen to
have worked with him, 35 years ago, at Northern Radio Co. He
was more than compitant then, and still compitant now, well as long as
you take into account that he may be having "Senior Moments" these days.


as for your spelling..... quote from above...."knowing trhat your"

Just what word is that in the middle there? Does "thrat" count?


Bruce in alaska


Probably about as much as a competent speller would think... absent any
"senior moments"

--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
"Microsoft Wheel. Now with 8 sides for a smoother ride."
-- The Ghost in the Machine, in COLA
  #54   Report Post  
Brian Whatcott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:06:47 GMT, Bruce in Alaska
wrote:

In article ,
Brian Whatcott wrote:

Oh, I feel such a dud, not even knowing trhat your anonymous buddy is
in fact a big man on the radio waves in Alaska.

Oh, I feel so bad.
Still, I *can* spell. Does that count?
:-)

Brian W


and what makes you thnk he is "My Buddy"....... I just happen to
have worked with him, 35 years ago, at Northern Radio Co. He
was more than compitant then, and still compitant now, well as long as
you take into account that he may be having "Senior Moments" these days.


as for your spelling..... quote from above...."knowing trhat your"

Just what word is that in the middle there? Does "thrat" count?


Bruce in alaska



I'll trade three" trhats" to two of your (and strangely enough ME's)
"compitants"

You two must really get along well together when you meet?

:-)

Brian W


  #55   Report Post  
Heikki
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Me" wrote:

There are few 3 Mhz Marine Frequencies, (Mostly in alaskan waters)
and most non-commercial MF/HF Marine Radio Users rarely use any below
the Maritime Mobile 4 Mhz Band.


I don't claim to be any sort of expert, but on the radio course I took, we
learned that 2182 kHz is "the international distress, safety and calling
frequency for radiotelephony". As far as I can see that is well below 4MHz,
and commonly used even outside Alaska.

-Heikki




  #56   Report Post  
Me
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Heikki wrote:

"Me" wrote:

There are few 3 Mhz Marine Frequencies, (Mostly in alaskan waters)
and most non-commercial MF/HF Marine Radio Users rarely use any below
the Maritime Mobile 4 Mhz Band.


I don't claim to be any sort of expert, but on the radio course I took, we
learned that 2182 kHz is "the international distress, safety and calling
frequency for radiotelephony". As far as I can see that is well below 4MHz,
and commonly used even outside Alaska.

-Heikki



Actually you will find that in the USA, 2182 Khz is not used along our
Coasts for the simple reason that it's daytime coverage (Groundwave)
is easily covered by Remote Base VHF Highsite Radio Systems. This is
different then most of the European Countires as they tend to have
significantly less coastline to monitor, and usally it can be done with
just one or two stations in any country. All High Seas Distress Radio
Systems are now based on the IMO GMDSS Convention, which feature
multiple Maritime Radio Frequencies in the HF Band. In the USA 2182.0
Khz isn't even monitored on a regular basis by human ears. For the
North Pacific, 4125.0 Khz is moniotred by human ears, from Kodiak,
Hawii, and Comox BC on a 24/7 basis.


Me who understands the difference between the book,
and reality.....
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HF antenna placement question Skip Gundlach Boat Building 55 August 14th 05 10:56 AM
SSB Antenna for a Ketch David Swindon Electronics 45 November 12th 04 07:47 PM
GR100 - antenna question Nick Electronics 0 May 10th 04 10:49 PM
Antenna Ratings sk Electronics 22 January 7th 04 12:27 PM
weatherfax Klaus Electronics 9 August 29th 03 02:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017