Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With out question, roller furling for the head sail. You will be on duty at
the helm anyway...though very nice, an Autohelm is not strictly necessary, though might seem so on a long passage. I'm just thinking of those nights at the helm with most of the crew sleeping, squally blowing in an seas breaking over the front of your boat, and flowing down your lee deck. May not be the time you would feel like strolling to the foredeck to shorten sail. Glenn. s/v Seawing www.seawing.net wrote in message oups.com... Lauri Tarkkonen wrote: In Lloyd Sumpter writes: On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:29:41 +0000, Mic wrote: On a sailing craft which purchase would be a priority an AutoPilot or a furling (head sail)? And why? "Furler" I donno. Roller reefing, absulutely (on the headsail at least). A properly-balanced sailboat under sail doesn't really need autohelm anyway: I've sailed across Georgia Strait and never touched the helm. Having roller reefing allows you to reef the headsail without having to go forward. Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 I would beg to differ, an autopilot is something that you can use for most of your time afloat, the roller of the headsail is needed only for a couple of minutes when you hoist and take your headsail down. If you are interested in sailing then a partly rolled headsail is not a satisfactory solution. - Lauri Tarkkonen I have both RF and AP on my 28' S2 and I bought the AP many yrs ago but the RF just last year. It is my experience that the RF is used far more than the AP and greatly increases the amount that I actually sail because it can be unfurled easily when you get a light breeze and easily furled when the wind dies. Sailing on close quarters where you have to drop the jib a lot, say the ICW, the RF means you will sail much more of the time because dropping the head sail every time you go under a bridge is a pain whereas the RF is a breeze. For short or single handed sailing, the RF means not going forward to deal with a headsail so you can stay and steer while furling or unfurling the headsail. I believe the RF will greatly improve your sailing experience. Under these conditions, I also consider the RF to be a safety enhancement. I can definitively say that RF has increased the quantity and quality of my sailing. The AP is very nice, but not essential for most coastal cruising. On a recent 30 hour sail across the Gulf of Mexico (only about 130 miles), we had 3 people aboard and rarely used the AP although we did use it some. For shorter distances, you might like the feedback of using the tiller. I have to admit, for those long hours of motoring when there is little or no wind, the AP is nice. Note that it is also possible to rig up a "self tending tiller arrangement" with bungees and line that will keep you on a specific course with respect to the wind. In short, if I was short of funds and had to make a choice, I'd go with the RF and rig up a self tending device for the tiller. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Garmins and autopilot interfaces | Electronics | |||
Roller Furling | Cruising | |||
Autopilot fails on Raytheon ST5000+ with "No Data" error | Cruising | |||
Furling Genoa | Cruising | |||
Furling mainsail idea | Cruising |