Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under some circumstances, a freewheeling prop may have less drag than
a fixed one. Props on normal transmissions are not freewheeling however. There is enough drag in the shaftline, bearings, and transmission to upset things. Outboards, with their clutches right in the lower unit are closer to freewheeling. Roger Long I will second Roger on this. The dinghy experiment would be valid on a very naiive level of thinking and the experiment with the fishing lure is invalid because the boat propellors is NOT freewheeling. There is quite a bit of friction involved. In some cases the gearbox get too hot to hold a hand on it because the transmission fluid is not pumped around and while lubricating it is also transmitting the heat away. - Lauri Tarkkonen Actually, the dingy experiment is on the right track. It seems to me that the energy dissipated in the prop/shaft/transmission/oil train is irrelevant. That is energy that *would* had been dissipated in redirecting water flow. Look at it simply; you have *one* energy source, and that's the water 'stream' past the prop (not quite accurate of course, since the overall drag will affect the 'stream' velocity, but it's an easier way to envision it). The amount of energy extracted from that source will be the result of 1) frictional losses, 2) inertial forces, i.e. energy required to redirect the mass of water striking the prop surfaces (not straightforward to calculate), and 3) impact forces (momemtum, if we're thinking in terms of a 'stream'). Now, the only issue is whether the drag at the prop is more or less when fixed. So *if* the freewheeling prop has less drag than the fixed prop, then so will the turning prop attached to the prop/shaft/transmission/oil train. To the extent that energy is dissipated by the drive train, the prop will be rotating slower, and the system will behave somewhere in between fixed and freewheeling. Now, whether the fixed or turning has less drag, under any particular set of parameters, I don't know. I suspect it's a wash. Clearly a totally freewheeling prop would have less, as the impact forces are reduced, as is the angular deflection of the water stream, leaving mostly frictional losses. I suspect though, as appears the case on my Catalina 30, that the prop when turning significantly slower than it's pitch rate (i.e. dragging the shaft and trans with it) creates nearly the same drag as the fixed prop. Keith Hughes |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Propeller Seminar accredited for Continuing Education credits | Boat Building | |||
steering question | Cruising | |||
Propeller rotation - important? | General | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
propeller engineering question | General |