Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry W4CSC" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Flemming Torp" fletopkanelbolle2rp.danmark wrote in : My intuition tells me that when you ' loosen the grip' on the propeller shaft and let the propeller turn freely, it reduces the drag on the boat. Right or wrong? It'd be real easy to test. Get one of those plastic props for a small outboard, put it on a shaft. Pull it loosely behind the boat, FREEWHEELING, with no load (which produces no work) using a simple fish weighing scale to measure its drag. Then, lock it to the shaft so it can't turn and drag it at the same speed, yet again. Wanna bet the locked prop draggin' through the water creates lots more drag than the one locked that can't turn? Take the dingy out for a spin. Run it wide open then drop the engine into neutral, freewheeling the prop, and see how long it takes to stop dead. Crank it back up and run it wide open again. This time, leave it in gear and just pull the safety lanyard making it lock the prop dead still. Retime how long it takes it to stop. More the drag, the quicker the stop. You'll find it stops MUCH quicker pulling that STALLED prop through the water than one FREEWHEELING. As Lionheart's freewheeling shaft alternator is TURNED ON to produce power (producing torque on the alternator shaft), it SLOWS the boat as the alternator SLOWS THE PROP. The heavier it pulls (more torque produced), the more it slows the boat and prop. Freewheeling props are producing a minimal amount of torque...and work with no or little load...as load increases, to the point of being stalled at maximum torque, the drag- converted-into-torque INCREASES, not decreases! If you were to spin the prop faster than its drag is capable of, you will pass through a point of ZERO DRAG just at the point where increasing the speed of the prop PRODUCES THRUST. So, as prop speed DECREASES, drag INCREASES! As prop speed INCREASES, it passes through zero drag at the point where it starts to produce thrust by turning it even faster! I'm not a physicist, but I play one on Usenet....(c; Your assignment for tomorrow's class is pages 287 through 312. Do the workbook exercies on workbook pages 42-43 for turn in. The test will be on Friday at 2PM. It might also be a good time to point out that the HELICOPTER rotor CHANGES DIRECTION as the chopper crashes. It is FORCED in the OPPOSITE direction from freewheeling to provide DOWNDRAFT to hold the craft aloft by the engine. As it decends freewheeling, unless you can reverse the pitch of the rotor, the RISING air through it will make it spin in the opposite direction.....making it not relevant to any of our discussion here as props are fixed pitched and already going in the direction of flow caused by thrust. Geez.... Thank you for proposing an interesting experiment ... I will try to set up this experiment during the summer holidays ... In the meantime, I must admit, I'm getting pretty much confused ... I have just appreciated and accepted Roger Longs 'lecture' on drag and rotation speed etc., where the conclusion was: The locked propeller gives the maxium speed compared to the freewheeling propeller ... And now, you testify just to the opposite ... My intuition was exactly as you write - I quote: Wanna bet the locked prop draggin' through the water creates lots more drag than the one locked that can't turn? Unquote. I think I understand what you mean, but being a Dane, and having read it quite a few times makes me a little uncomfortable - is the sentence correctly phrased? The beauty of your proposed experiment is, that it is very operational with a little plastic propellerthing and the weight from my wifes kitchen, a string and a piece of wood. And you can repeat the experiment several time under different conditions ... I will have to find out have to keep the propeller from turning and at the same time measure the drag on the weight, without affecting the weight measurement ... I don't have a motor on the dinghy ... I had serious problems understanding the helicopter analogy .... and the way you phrase the case is the way, my intuition saw the situation - I quote: It might also be a good time to point out that the HELICOPTER rotor CHANGES DIRECTION as the chopper crashes. It is FORCED in the OPPOSITE direction from freewheeling to provide DOWNDRAFT to hold the craft aloft by the engine. unquote. Therefore, I do not see, that this analogy explains anything related to my question. May be an old quotation is in place now: I'm still confused, but - hopefully - at a higher level ??? As to the assignment, I'm afraid I forgot my textbook in the office, and I will be working from other places the rest of the week .... sorry! I'm 'afraid' this debate is not over yet, but you have given me inspiration to make some funny experiments, that might give me and my brother in law a clear and convincing answer, so we can settle our little dispute ... thankyou! -- Flemming Torp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Propeller Seminar accredited for Continuing Education credits | Boat Building | |||
steering question | Cruising | |||
Propeller rotation - important? | General | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
propeller engineering question | General |