Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Gogarty wrote:
In article , fletopkanelbolle2rp.danmark says... My brother in law, and I have had a discussion of whether it is best - from a pure speed point of view (no consideration to the mechanics/oil/maintenance/gearbox etc. here ...) whether you should let your "fixed three bladed propeller" run/turn or keep it fixed (like put into gear) when sailing just for the wind with your sails in a 34 feet cruiser weighing roughly 5 T ... We have - unsuccesfully - tried to find out using the log ... the results were not conclusive - or one of us would not admit, that the other was right ... I think we need a testimony from someone, that has a 'scientific based valid answer' ... or just knows for sure ... The assumption is: There is no way to move, turn, 'collapse' anything on the propeller - the 'blades' are fixed ... (hard to explain in a language, that is not your own ... hope you get my point). 1. Many transmissions require a running engine to keep them lubricated. Such transmissions should be locvked in reverse to prevent freewheeling. 2. A freewheeling propeller creates more drag than a locked on.. Just consider a helicopter. Engine out and rotors freewheeling, the aircraft will go down safely. Rotors locked and it drops like a stone. The analogys between aircraft and boat propellors do not hold up when examined by people who understand the physics involved. I have a very superficial understanding of the matter, but I can see several problems with it. An aircraft with a fixed pitch propellor will glide farther with the propellor stopped because the propellor is bolted directly to the engine crankshaft. If the prop is turning, the engine is turning. If the engine is dead but still being turned, the power to turn the engine is being extracted from the air flowing through the propellor. The power lost in turning the porpellor and engine shows up as drag in the airstream which requires a steeper and shorter glide to maintain a flyable airspeed. If the engine can be separated from the propellor by placing a transmission into neutral as I would expect the case to be in a sailboat, I would guess that a free wheeling prop would produce less drag than pulling the stalled propellor blades through the water. It should take very little power to turn a shaft riding in two or three bearings with no load on them. The turbulence of the stopped propellor blades dragging through the water at nearly right angles to their streamline shape should put up a lot more resistance. A helicopter rotor bears no resemblance to a boat propellor because the rotor blades have variable pitch that can change each blade individually. The pitch angle can be set so that (in one exampe) the blade that is moving forward has a very low pitch while the blade that is moving backward has a very high pitch. This means that the individual blades are constantly twisting and turning in their hub bearings as the entire rotor assembly goes around. There is nothing similar to that in any boat propellor that I have ever heard of. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Propeller Seminar accredited for Continuing Education credits | Boat Building | |||
steering question | Cruising | |||
Propeller rotation - important? | General | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
propeller engineering question | General |