sorry to show my computer un-savvy BUt I would like to know how to set
up a kill file to cut out some of these lame idiots that wish to
pollute the Rec.boats.cruising forum.

Wreck.boats is junk.

BTW I'm using Google Groups.

Thanks.
Tim

On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:02:47 -0700, Tim wrote
(in article .com):

sorry to show my computer un-savvy BUt I would like to know how to set
up a kill file to cut out some of these lame idiots that wish to
pollute the Rec.boats.cruising forum.

Wreck.boats is junk.

BTW I'm using Google Groups.

Thanks.
Tim


Tim, I don't believe you can set up a killfile in Google's Groups.

If you download a newsreader (check out www.tucows.com) you will be able to
read newsgroups and most have killfile capabilities.

Tim, I don't believe you can set up a killfile in Google's Groups.

If you download a newsreader (check out www.tucows.com) you will be
able to
read newsgroups and most have killfile capabilities.


Thanks, I'll check into it.

Tim

"Tim" wrote in message ups.com...



Tim, I don't believe you can set up a killfile in Google's Groups.

If you download a newsreader (check out www.tucows.com) you will be
able to
read newsgroups and most have killfile capabilities.


Thanks, I'll check into it.

Tim

You do that, you little putz, though I doubt you're intelligent enough to
install and use a newsreader. I hope to be the very first entry on your
killfile list. I don't wish to be read by idiots . . .

CN

Capt. Neal=AE wrote:

You do that, you little putz, though I doubt you're intelligent
enough to
install and use a newsreader. I hope to be the very first entry on
your
killfile list. I don't wish to be read by idiots . . .

CN


You'll have to wait in line Neal. Harry Krause is first, but don't be
dissapointed, you'll make the list.

Tim

Thanks, I'll check into it.

Tim

You do that, you little putz, though I doubt you're intelligent enough to
install and use a newsreader. I hope to be the very first entry on your
killfile list. I don't wish to be read by idiots . . .

Well put and thanks for the input Neal. We all admit to being idiots...you
don't want to be read by idiots...therefore take your eloquent prose and
post it were there are intellectuals capable of interpreting your lofty
ramblings. We idiots won't miss you one bit...even Peggy who is smart as
****!
Bruce

On 8 Apr 2005 22:02:47 -0700, "Tim" wrote:

sorry to show my computer un-savvy BUt I would like to know how to set
up a kill file to cut out some of these lame idiots that wish to
pollute the Rec.boats.cruising forum.

Wreck.boats is junk.

BTW I'm using Google Groups.

Thanks.
Tim

Without a doubt Agent is the best newsreader out there. Especially
when you can globally killfile someone.

http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php


Ironhorse, HSB#96, SENS BS
2001 Ultraclassic with Sidecar
96 Custom bucket of bolts (gone but not forgotten)

"Bruce on horizon" wrote in message . ..

Well put and thanks for the input Neal. We all admit to being idiots...you
don't want to be read by idiots...therefore take your eloquent prose and
post it were there are intellectuals capable of interpreting your lofty
ramblings. We idiots won't miss you one bit...even Peggy who is smart as
****!
Bruce


Dear Group of Idiots and Peggie Hall Labia Lappers,

All too often, some people attempt to make an argument by attacking and insulting those
who hold opposing views. Bruce's tactics are a perfect example. So let's begin, quite
properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted
solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. Try as I may, I can't understand why he
would want to gag free speech. I and Bruce part company when it comes to the issue of
sucking Peggie's dick. He feels that newsgroups should belong to imbeciles, while I insist
that she has garnered enough support to accelerate the natural tendency of Usenet to devolve
from lame to lamer, liberty to tyranny, virtue to vice and freedom of speech to censorship
but not enough support to make her **** not stink. Or, to express that sentiment without all
of the emotionally charged lingo, he uses the words without ever having taken the time to
look them up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should
be ignored, not debated, debased, debauched and debunked as is the temptation.

It's a well-known fact that the worst sorts of dissolute yokels there are thrive on hatred
rather than love. It's an equally well-known fact that I don't need to be particularly delicate
here. When logic puts these two facts together, the necessary result is an understanding that
Bruce takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent
referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't
support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position.

Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which self-righteous yahoos are directly or
indirectly responsible, I shall pick out only a single one which is most in keeping with the inner
essence of Bruce's antisocial agendas: defeatism. The idea of letting him fill the air with
recrimination and rancor is, in itself, treacherous. That being the case, we can infer that the
baneful nature of his witticisms is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. I think
I've dished it out to Bruce as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I
say that Bruce is positing a "valid" logic devoid of empirical content (i.e., devoid of facts).

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal

Dear Group of Idiots and Peggie Hall Labia Lappers,

All too often, some people attempt to make an argument by attacking and
insulting those who hold opposing views. Bruce's tactics are a perfect
example. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the
historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of
the eternal argument about it. Try as I may, I can't understand why he
would want to gag free speech. I and Bruce part company when it comes to
the issue of sucking Peggie's dick. He feels that newsgroups should belong
to imbeciles, while I insist that she has garnered enough support to
accelerate the natural tendency of Usenet to devolve from lame to lamer,
liberty to tyranny, virtue to vice and freedom of speech to censorship but
not enough support to make her **** not stink. Or, to express that
sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, he uses the words
without ever having taken the time to look them up in the dictionary.
People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored,
not debated, debased, debauched and debunked as is the temptation.

It's a well-known fact that the worst sorts of dissolute yokels there are
thrive on hatred rather than love. It's an equally well-known fact that I
don't need to be particularly delicate here. When logic puts these two
facts together, the necessary result is an understanding that Bruce takes
things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide
decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all
of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly
contradicts) his position.
Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which self-righteous
yahoos are directly or indirectly responsible, I shall pick out only a
single one which is most in keeping with the inner essence of Bruce's
antisocial agendas: defeatism. The idea of letting him fill the air with
recrimination and rancor is, in itself, treacherous. That being the case,
we can infer that the baneful nature of his witticisms is not just a
rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. I think I've dished it out to
Bruce as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say
that Bruce is positing a "valid" logic devoid of empirical content (i.e.,
devoid of facts).

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal

I am soooo sorry Neal....I am an Idiot and so unworthy of reading your
response. Are you still looking for someone as intelligent as yourself to
exchange ideas with? Write long rambling disjointed post that try to make a
point but fail because the thesaurus is stuck on the keyboard? I am sorry
you won't find it here, as we are all idiots and Peggie Hall Labia Lappers.
You might try the mensa.sigs.giftedchildern group to satisfy you needs.
Capt Neal, please refer to me as a 'dissolute yokel"...I like that better
than my given name. Have a nice day.

In article ,
says...

Without a doubt Agent is the best newsreader out there. Especially
when you can globally killfile someone.

I use a really ancient newsreader called WinVn. Few bells and whistles
but everything you need. Its kill file filter is particularly effective
and easy to set up. It can filter on any and all fields in a header. So
even though some people can slip one through once, they can't do it
twice. It just takes a little longer to load headers if they are
searching some of the more obscure fields.

So I still see objectionable postings but only when someone else quotes
them.