Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somebody wrote:
I just found a 90 pound stainless steel plow to use as a mooring anchor. The guy I got it from said that he thinks there is an electrolysis issue if you use galvanized chain. He said that there was something I needed to do, but couldn't remember what. Anyone have any clues for me? There is. Install a monel or equal link between the S/S and the galvanized items. Lew |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Lew,
The monel link wouldn't prevent the galvanized chain from coming into direct contact with the anchor. It would be a great solution if the chain could be held taut and away from the anchor. Chuck Lew Hodgett wrote: Somebody wrote: I just found a 90 pound stainless steel plow to use as a mooring anchor. The guy I got it from said that he thinks there is an electrolysis issue if you use galvanized chain. He said that there was something I needed to do, but couldn't remember what. Anyone have any clues for me? There is. Install a monel or equal link between the S/S and the galvanized items. Lew |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a thick mud/sand bottom, mostly mud. WIth reversing tidal
current (4 knots) I expect the 90 stainless plow to dig in pretty deep within the first week or two (i'll be keeping a good eye on it during that time) - Chuck, it seems to me that with an achoring setup like that, the chain may very well be held away from the anchor and the monel link might work. What do you think - am i being too optimistic (stainless chain and new anchors are expensive) Thanks, Mike. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather than use a ss plow $$$ for a mooring, get 3 over-sized Danforths
spread out 120 degrees and leading to a central point with a swivel and a short chain to the buoy. I found that the chain becomes a more significant cost, so increase the anchor size and get by w/ less chain. With anchors, the mooring can be more easily raised and inspected. At least in the mud my mooring was set in, there was no detectable wear on the anchor or chain at that end (the labels were still on the anchors after a dozen years) . The chain does wear close to the middle (at the swivel), but you can replace those sections w/ new chain and clevis connecting links. wrote in message ups.com... This is a thick mud/sand bottom, mostly mud. WIth reversing tidal current (4 knots) I expect the 90 stainless plow to dig in pretty deep within the first week or two (i'll be keeping a good eye on it during that time) - Chuck, it seems to me that with an achoring setup like that, the chain may very well be held away from the anchor and the monel link might work. What do you think - am i being too optimistic (stainless chain and new anchors are expensive) Thanks, Mike. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would that really help?
I thought that if the two dissimilar metals were electrically connected, you had a problem. Hanging a zinc guppy overboard will sacrifice the guppy, so why wouldn't the galvanized chain be sacreificed even if it was seperated, but electrically connected? Electrolysis can be a real problem. I had a bridle w/ almost all ss parts: chain hook, ring, shackles and thimbles. Everything except about 5 links of galvanized chain between the chain hook and the shackle connecting to the ring. Those links quickly became rust, so I replaced the ss with galvanized. Of course, all this was in direct contact with each other, but I suspect that electrical contact is enough to creat a problem. "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message ink.net... Somebody wrote: I just found a 90 pound stainless steel plow to use as a mooring anchor. The guy I got it from said that he thinks there is an electrolysis issue if you use galvanized chain. He said that there was something I needed to do, but couldn't remember what. Anyone have any clues for me? There is. Install a monel or equal link between the S/S and the galvanized items. Lew |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I understand it, two dissimilar metals in an electrolyte
is a necessary but not sufficient condition for corrosion to occur. If the chain is electrically connected to the anchor, but 50 feet away from it, very little of the zinc would be sacrificed. This is where I was originally going with the 50 feet of nylon. In the case of a single monel link, I believe you are entirely correct. The galvanized chain will be sacrificed almost as readily as without the monel link, even if the galvanized chain links never touch the stainless steel directly. Thanks for pointing that out. Chuck Garland Gray II wrote: Would that really help? I thought that if the two dissimilar metals were electrically connected, you had a problem. Hanging a zinc guppy overboard will sacrifice the guppy, so why wouldn't the galvanized chain be sacreificed even if it was seperated, but electrically connected? Electrolysis can be a real problem. I had a bridle w/ almost all ss parts: chain hook, ring, shackles and thimbles. Everything except about 5 links of galvanized chain between the chain hook and the shackle connecting to the ring. Those links quickly became rust, so I replaced the ss with galvanized. Of course, all this was in direct contact with each other, but I suspect that electrical contact is enough to creat a problem. "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message ink.net... Somebody wrote: I just found a 90 pound stainless steel plow to use as a mooring anchor. The guy I got it from said that he thinks there is an electrolysis issue if you use galvanized chain. He said that there was something I needed to do, but couldn't remember what. Anyone have any clues for me? There is. Install a monel or equal link between the S/S and the galvanized items. Lew |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In Search of Stainless Steel Staples | Boat Building | |||
Stainless steel running gear | Boat Building | |||
316 Stainless steel 3mm thick | UK Power Boats | |||
5mm thick stainless steel | Power Boat Racing | |||
back with a problem now | General |