schlakoff, admit you were the source of the conclusion, **IF** you are capable
of understanding the ramifications of your statement. otherwise, admit you
abject stupidity.

(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 12:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 00:30:55 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

rhys, I was taking schlackoff's stupid statement to its conclusion.

No, you were making yet another of your stupid statements.

Steve

On 15 Oct 2004 11:59:51 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlakoff, admit you were the source of the conclusion, **IF** you are capable
of understanding the ramifications of your statement. otherwise, admit you
abject stupidity.

Jox, admit your conclusion that "a 350# draw crossbow can fire twenty
bolts a minute, while a 100# longbow can fire off nearer to 100 shafts a
minute" is a completely absurd extension from the simple statement that
your original firing rate of "it took two men most of two minutes to
load and fire a crossbow, while a longbowman could pump out three shafts
a minute" is on the high side. If you can't imagine a true firing rate
somewhere between those two extremes, you are even dumber than you
appear to be... and that's pretty dumb.

Steve


(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 12:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 00:30:55 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

rhys, I was taking schlackoff's stupid statement to its conclusion.

No, you were making yet another of your stupid statements.

Steve

schlackoff, are you drunk so early in the evening that you post this trip
without knowing it?


(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 ----------------- 6:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
----------------------
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 11:59:51 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlakoff, admit you were the source of the conclusion, **IF** you are
capable
of understanding the ramifications of your statement. otherwise, admit you
abject stupidity.

Jox, admit your conclusion that "a 350# draw crossbow can fire twenty
bolts a minute, while a 100# longbow can fire off nearer to 100 shafts a
minute" is a completely absurd extension from the simple statement that
your original firing rate of "it took two men most of two minutes to
load and fire a crossbow, while a longbowman could pump out three shafts
a minute" is on the high side. If you can't imagine a true firing rate
somewhere between those two extremes, you are even dumber than you
appear to be... and that's pretty dumb.

Steve


(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 12:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 00:30:55 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

rhys, I was taking schlackoff's stupid statement to its conclusion.

No, you were making yet another of your stupid statements.

Steve

On 16 Oct 2004 01:20:48 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, are you drunk so early in the evening that you post this trip
without knowing it?

I didn't think you'd have the mental capacity to understand it. Here
you admit it's true.

Steve

(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 ----------------- 6:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
----------------------
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 11:59:51 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlakoff, admit you were the source of the conclusion, **IF** you are
capable
of understanding the ramifications of your statement. otherwise, admit you
abject stupidity.

Jox, admit your conclusion that "a 350# draw crossbow can fire twenty
bolts a minute, while a 100# longbow can fire off nearer to 100 shafts a
minute" is a completely absurd extension from the simple statement that
your original firing rate of "it took two men most of two minutes to
load and fire a crossbow, while a longbowman could pump out three shafts
a minute" is on the high side. If you can't imagine a true firing rate
somewhere between those two extremes, you are even dumber than you
appear to be... and that's pretty dumb.

Steve


(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/15/2004 12:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 15 Oct 2004 00:30:55 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

rhys, I was taking schlackoff's stupid statement to its conclusion.

No, you were making yet another of your stupid statements.

Steve

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

On 16 Oct 2004 13:30:09 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

lol, enough said. Thanks for resorting to the oldest trick in the
book and proving once and for all that you're an idiot.

Steve