schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

On 16 Oct 2004 13:30:09 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

lol, enough said. Thanks for resorting to the oldest trick in the
book and proving once and for all that you're an idiot.

Steve

On 16 Oct 2004 16:49:33 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

idiot? schlackoff, *you* are the guy who to a toy crossbow and go hunting 17
year old pirates with AK-47's. So, who is the idiot?

Lay off the booze before you post, will ya? Oh, and to answer your
question, you are.

Steve

From: (Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/16/2004 11:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 16 Oct 2004 13:30:09 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

lol, enough said. Thanks for resorting to the oldest trick in the
book and proving once and for all that you're an idiot.

Steve

On 16 Oct 2004 13:29:06 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jimmy, let me parse this for you.

"as a ------------------ weapon ---------------------------- of
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((war)))))))))))))))))) )))))))))), the biggest
crossbows ever had a range of about 30
feet"

jimmy, that statement means if the damned thing is useless beyond 30 feet it
ain't a weapon of war. therefore, its [effective] range [as a weapon of war]
is 30 feet.


It doesn't matter how often you repeat it Jax, you are incorrect.


jimmy, let me explain this another way. An M-14 can pitch a round
something like 3,000 yards, yet its [effective] range is about 500
yards. Getting hit by an M-14 round at 500 yards is going to cause
some problems, while getting hit by an M-14 round at 3,000 yards is
likely to merely **** you off.


Not relevent to the claim you made regarding crossbows.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Life is too short to be taken seriously.
-- Oscar Wilde

jimmy, reality is for people who can't handle drugs.

not sure I am happy to see you are beyond reality, but hey, enjoy dood all
those green and orange colors.

From: Jim Richardson
Date: 10/16/2004 9:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 16 Oct 2004 13:29:06 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jimmy, let me parse this for you.

"as a ------------------ weapon ---------------------------- of
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((war)))))))))))))))))) )))))))))), the biggest
crossbows ever had a range of about 30
feet"

jimmy, that statement means if the damned thing is useless beyond 30 feet
it
ain't a weapon of war. therefore, its [effective] range [as a weapon of
war]
is 30 feet.


It doesn't matter how often you repeat it Jax, you are incorrect.


jimmy, let me explain this another way. An M-14 can pitch a round
something like 3,000 yards, yet its [effective] range is about 500
yards. Getting hit by an M-14 round at 500 yards is going to cause
some problems, while getting hit by an M-14 round at 3,000 yards is
likely to merely **** you off.


Not relevent to the claim you made regarding crossbows.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Life is too short to be taken seriously.
-- Oscar Wilde