On 02 Sep 2004 12:17:42 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
and green is lollipops to a true-believer, jim.

look up the term "cognitive dissidense" (pardon the terbil spelink, but you
ain't gonna look the psychological underpinnings to your behavior anyway)


There's a trend here, When JAXAshby loses a debate on the technical
issues, he starts flinging insults.

noted.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Instruction ends in the schoolroom -- but education
ends only with life. -- Publilius Syrus.

jim, it is you who lost the debate two days ago when you told one and all you
didn't even understand that terms, let alone the principles involved.

even when I explained the terms to you, you still couldn't keep up.

From: Jim Richardson
Date: 9/2/2004 2:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 02 Sep 2004 12:17:42 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
and green is lollipops to a true-believer, jim.

look up the term "cognitive dissidense" (pardon the terbil spelink, but you
ain't gonna look the psychological underpinnings to your behavior anyway)


There's a trend here, When JAXAshby loses a debate on the technical
issues, he starts flinging insults.

noted.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Instruction ends in the schoolroom -- but education
ends only with life. -- Publilius Syrus.

On 03 Sep 2004 04:04:08 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jim, it is you who lost the debate two days ago when you told one and all you
didn't even understand that terms, let alone the principles involved.

even when I explained the terms to you, you still couldn't keep up.


You haven't explained anything yet. But I am still hopeful.

So how is the autoprop not a feathering propellor JAXAshby?


--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Remember - if all you have is an axe, every problem looks like hours of fun.
Frossie

oh, jim, it has been explained in terms even a 10 year kid could understand.
get your older sister to explain it to you.

From: Jim Richardson
Date: 9/3/2004 4:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 03 Sep 2004 04:04:08 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jim, it is you who lost the debate two days ago when you told one and all
you
didn't even understand that terms, let alone the principles involved.

even when I explained the terms to you, you still couldn't keep up.


You haven't explained anything yet. But I am still hopeful.

So how is the autoprop not a feathering propellor JAXAshby?


--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Remember - if all you have is an axe, every problem looks like hours of fun.
Frossie

On 03 Sep 2004 11:58:59 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
oh, jim, it has been explained in terms even a 10 year kid could
understand. get your older sister to explain it to you.



Well, I don't have an older sister JAXAshy, so perhaps you can try
again.

How is the autoprop not feathering?

The blades swivel to be inline with the axis of the shaft, and present
less drag than in the forward or reverse config. How is that not
feathering?


--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
"We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in
tolerance and free speech," - David Brin

Subject: What are the pros and cons of a folding prop?
From: Jim Richardson
Date: 09/03/2004 19:51 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 03 Sep 2004 11:58:59 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
oh, jim, it has been explained in terms even a 10 year kid could
understand. get your older sister to explain it to you.



Well, I don't have an older sister JAXAshy, so perhaps you can try
again.

How is the autoprop not feathering?

The blades swivel to be inline with the axis of the shaft, and present
less drag than in the forward or reverse config. How is that not
feathering?


Jim, the issue is not whether the autoprop can be called a feathering prop.
The issue is, how long can Doodles keep you arguing the point.


Shen

On 04 Sep 2004 17:15:55 GMT,
Shen44 wrote:
Subject: What are the pros and cons of a folding prop?
From: Jim Richardson
Date: 09/03/2004 19:51 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 03 Sep 2004 11:58:59 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
oh, jim, it has been explained in terms even a 10 year kid could
understand. get your older sister to explain it to you.



Well, I don't have an older sister JAXAshy, so perhaps you can try
again.

How is the autoprop not feathering?

The blades swivel to be inline with the axis of the shaft, and present
less drag than in the forward or reverse config. How is that not
feathering?


Jim, the issue is not whether the autoprop can be called a feathering prop.
The issue is, how long can Doodles keep you arguing the point.



Yeah, the old adage about mud wrestling with a pig springs to mind...

--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Windows XP... now runs all your favorite viruses.