Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
Today started early - too early, as I couldn't get back to sleep after waking at 3:30AM.
So, I did as I always do after 30 minutes awake - I got up, and read. Then I headed to the boat, where I resolved the conflict in my WiFi system, thus providing access to the dozen or so folks who have come to rely on my signal. Then I dove into the engine room again, where, the short story is that I can't get my smallest feeler gauge, 0.003", between any place, at any rotation, on the joint between the coupling and transmission flange on the engine alignment I'd worried so much about. Before that, I did the gross alignment, making the shaft centered in the exit tube and cutlass bearing, and hand-movable with little effort from outside, in the middle, and at the transmission. The actual alignment was as expected, lots of cut-and-try, but now all is locked down. I'll let it settle for a couple of days, shake the engine as much as I can and check it again, but I'd bet I'm done, as my crawling all over the engine to get to the mounts, at my 200+ avoirdupois has surely caused it to move and settle nicely. Reward is burger on the grill, followed by ice cream, before I head back tomorrow for more boat chores in prep for getting back on the high seas. Great day! |
#12
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
"Flying Pig" wrote in message
... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message news:504a191a$0$62077 Poor Skippy!!! It sounds like your amateur attempt at alignment is doomed to failure. Why? Because there is a lot more to alignment that just centering the shaft in the log. A perfectly centered shaft can fail to be perfectly aligned with the transmission output shaft/flange. IOW, if the two flanges that bolt together are not perfectly parallel both top to bottom and side to side and everywhere else, when the propeller shaft is centered in the log there will be a terrible vibration set up as the two flanges will bind and loosen as they rotate. The only way to get them perfect is by using two dial gauges, one for each flange and as you rotate them with perhaps an 18th inch of space between them (in neutral) by hand both gauges must not move more than a blonde hair. Sounds to me you are doing the job only halfway, Skippy. Wilbur Hubbard Heh. Reading deficit, eh? We got the shaft centered. That took care of the alignment with the cutlass. The shaft turns readily, by hand, from the skinny end outside, the middle, next to the log, and the transmission, where I've got the coupling mated with the bolts, but not yet tightened, as we've not yet aligned the engine. That's what I'm talking about. When you snug up the two flanges (propeller shaft flange and engine/transmission flange - assuming engine and transmission are integreal) unless their two flange faces are perfectly alligned snugging them down together will result is binding and releasing (vibration). Prior to snugging them down face-to-face you must assure yourself that they are perfectly parallel both horizontally and vertically. And, keep in mind, depending upon the flexibility of your old hull, that the relationship may well change when the boat is back in the water (not that that's EVER going to happen, LOL!) It can be rather tricky. Some of the Irwin 43's I helped build working as an MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) experienced this problem as the hulls were rather 'flexible' and the alignment was done on the production line. Some needed to be re-done once splashed. Wilbur Hubbard |
#13
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
"Flying Pig" wrote in message
... Today started early - too early, as I couldn't get back to sleep after waking at 3:30AM. So, I did as I always do after 30 minutes awake - I got up, and read. Then I headed to the boat, where I resolved the conflict in my WiFi system, thus providing access to the dozen or so folks who have come to rely on my signal. Then I dove into the engine room again, where, the short story is that I can't get my smallest feeler gauge, 0.003", between any place, at any rotation, on the joint between the coupling and transmission flange on the engine alignment I'd worried so much about. Before that, I did the gross alignment, making the shaft centered in the exit tube and cutlass bearing, and hand-movable with little effort from outside, in the middle, and at the transmission. The actual alignment was as expected, lots of cut-and-try, but now all is locked down. I'll let it settle for a couple of days, shake the engine as much as I can and check it again, but I'd bet I'm done, as my crawling all over the engine to get to the mounts, at my 200+ avoirdupois has surely caused it to move and settle nicely. Reward is burger on the grill, followed by ice cream, before I head back tomorrow for more boat chores in prep for getting back on the high seas. ====================[reply]====================== Most likely wasted effort and a premature pat on the back. Come back and tell us the result once splashed. (That will probably be in 2013 or 2014 if past performance is an indication of future trends. LOL!) It might just be better to leave the final tightening until the "Pig" is floating again. And, feeler gauges don't cut it. Best you use two dial gauges working off the mating faces as I recommended. Once you have them perfect you can draw the two flanges completely together. Read this: http://www.hellersolutions.com/C350/...llManual10.pdf Wilbur Hubbard |
#14
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:56:00 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Flying Pig" wrote in message ... I made great progress in the alignment saga today. Lots more contortions, but the exertion part was alleviated by the borrowing of a couple of very serious wrenches, allowing me better leverage. Once I had stuff moving, I could use my smaller wrenches to good effect, having the ability to move them further because they were lots shorter. I got all of the sliding stuff loose today, something I'd been pretty concerned about. However, as most things I do will defer to brute force, and I'm a brute, sometimes, I got things started. At the moment we're nearly finished with the gross alignment of the shaft in the exit tube. Once we have that set, we'll go about making the face of the coupler match up perfectly with the flange on the transmission. As everything is entirely loose at the moment, I have little doubt that the hard part is yet come, as every loose part has to be retightened, and every time I do that, the alignment will change, slightly. However, I'll keep at it (I'm known for patience), and as long as I've got it all loose, won't settle for better than the .004 it was before (albeit, WAAAY off straight astern). WooHoo! ================[reply]======================= Poor Skippy!!! It sounds like your amateur attempt at alignment is doomed to failure. Why? Because there is a lot more to alignment that just centering the shaft in the log. A perfectly centered shaft can fail to be perfectly aligned with the transmission output shaft/flange. IOW, if the two flanges that bolt together are not perfectly parallel both top to bottom and side to side and everywhere else, when the propeller shaft is centered in the log there will be a terrible vibration set up as the two flanges will bind and loosen as they rotate. The only way to get them perfect is by using two dial gauges, one for each flange and as you rotate them with perhaps an 18th inch of space between them (in neutral) by hand both gauges must not move more than a blonde hair. Sounds to me you are doing the job only halfway, Skippy. Wilbur Hubbard How in the world would a chap who's entire boating experience involves a tiny plastic dinghy know anything about aligning an inboard installed engine and drive line? Easy.... he read it inna book and without other knowledge he professes to be an expert. Stupidity knows no bounds, apparently. Had you read the message, and had you an 8th grade command of English you would note the paragraph in which the O.P. states "At the moment we're nearly finished with the gross alignment of the shaft in the exit tube. Once we have that set, we'll go about making the face of the coupler match up perfectly with the flange on the transmission." But, as the Old Folks said, "stupid does as stupid does", and Willie provides living proof that they were right. |
#15
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:07:40 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Flying Pig" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message news:504a191a$0$62077 Poor Skippy!!! It sounds like your amateur attempt at alignment is doomed to failure. Why? Because there is a lot more to alignment that just centering the shaft in the log. A perfectly centered shaft can fail to be perfectly aligned with the transmission output shaft/flange. IOW, if the two flanges that bolt together are not perfectly parallel both top to bottom and side to side and everywhere else, when the propeller shaft is centered in the log there will be a terrible vibration set up as the two flanges will bind and loosen as they rotate. The only way to get them perfect is by using two dial gauges, one for each flange and as you rotate them with perhaps an 18th inch of space between them (in neutral) by hand both gauges must not move more than a blonde hair. Sounds to me you are doing the job only halfway, Skippy. Wilbur Hubbard Heh. Reading deficit, eh? We got the shaft centered. That took care of the alignment with the cutlass. The shaft turns readily, by hand, from the skinny end outside, the middle, next to the log, and the transmission, where I've got the coupling mated with the bolts, but not yet tightened, as we've not yet aligned the engine. That's what I'm talking about. When you snug up the two flanges (propeller shaft flange and engine/transmission flange - assuming engine and transmission are integreal) unless their two flange faces are perfectly alligned snugging them down together will result is binding and releasing (vibration). Prior to snugging them down face-to-face you must assure yourself that they are perfectly parallel both horizontally and vertically. And, keep in mind, depending upon the flexibility of your old hull, that the relationship may well change when the boat is back in the water (not that that's EVER going to happen, LOL!) It can be rather tricky. Some of the Irwin 43's I helped build working as an MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) experienced this problem as the hulls were rather 'flexible' and the alignment was done on the production line. Some needed to be re-done once splashed. Wilbur Hubbard Hey STUPID! Read the message before you set out to amaze us with your knowledge (or lack thereof). The O.P. stated, "... but not yet tightened, as we've not yet aligned the engine." Read it again, "WE'VE NOT YET ALIGNED THE ENGINE". Got it yet? HE HASN'T YET ALIGNED THE ENGINE, you ignorant fool. Question. Does sweeping the floor and emptying the trash can constitute "help build"? |
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
Hi, Y'all,
I'm enjoying the arguments :{)) While I was aware, of course, of the intricacies of alignment, I'd not seen the westerbeke manual pages. In fact, I did just as it suggested. Once I got it aligned, I pulled the bolts and rotated the tranny 1/4 turn and reinserted the bolts. Pulled mightily as I twisted my wrist, and repeated my feeler gauge bits at the entire circumference, rotated 90° per time. Can't get the gauge between any of the faces... There are actually more than one Bruce (the other being someone I met in the Endeavour group many years ago, who splashed his 43 after 10 years ashore, recently) who've had no movement once back in the water for a time; I'm hopeful I'll have the same results, but am prepared to do battle with the system again as needed. L8R, y'all - pix to come. Skip |
#17
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in
anews.com: Poor Skippy!!! It sounds like your amateur attempt at alignment is doomed to failure. Why? Because there is a lot more to alignment that just centering the shaft in the log. A perfectly centered shaft can fail to be perfectly aligned with the transmission output shaft/flange. IOW, if the two flanges that bolt together are not perfectly parallel both top to bottom and side to side and everywhere else, when the propeller shaft is centered in the log there will be a terrible vibration set up as the two flanges will bind and loosen as they rotate. The only way to get them perfect is by using two dial gauges, one for each flange and as you rotate them with perhaps an 18th inch of space between them (in neutral) by hand both gauges must not move more than a blonde hair. Sounds to me you are doing the job only halfway, Skippy. Wilbur Hubbard BullPucky! Its simple enough to get them dead in line with a feeler gauge between their faces. Simply rotate the two flanges together while checking the gaps at four points seperated by 90 degrees. (the measurement points rotate with the flanges). If they neither tighten or loosen on the gauge finger through a whole turn the angular alignment is 'dead nuts'. Of course you must get the prop shaft and transmission output shaft centres dead in line as well but you certainly dont need two dial gauges. BTDT including replacing the shaft log which involved fabricating a new GRP tube for the bronze log tube to fit in and glassing it in place. -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL |
#18
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
Flying Pig wrote in
: Hi, Y'all, I'm enjoying the arguments :{)) While I was aware, of course, of the intricacies of alignment, I'd not seen the westerbeke manual pages. In fact, I did just as it suggested. Once I got it aligned, I pulled the bolts and rotated the tranny 1/4 turn and reinserted the bolts. Pulled mightily as I twisted my wrist, and repeated my feeler gauge bits at the entire circumference, rotated 90° per time. Can't get the gauge between any of the faces... There are actually more than one Bruce (the other being someone I met in the Endeavour group many years ago, who splashed his 43 after 10 years ashore, recently) who've had no movement once back in the water for a time; I'm hopeful I'll have the same results, but am prepared to do battle with the system again as needed. L8R, y'all - pix to come. Skip Not good. You want enough clearance to get a feeler gauge in there, then rotate the two halves of the coupling TOGETHER while you check the clearance remains the same (at 4 positions round the coupling 90 deg apart). Twisting one half of the coupling 90 degrees only proves that the flanges are reasonably flat and square to the shafts. As you had the flanges jammed together, the shaft may be under enough compression load to bend it slightly to conform to the gearbox flange, hiding any misalignment. -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL |
#19
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 03:25:53 -0700 (PDT), Flying Pig
wrote: Hi, Y'all, I'm enjoying the arguments :{)) While I was aware, of course, of the intricacies of alignment, I'd not seen the westerbeke manual pages. In fact, I did just as it suggested. Once I got it aligned, I pulled the bolts and rotated the tranny 1/4 turn and reinserted the bolts. Pulled mightily as I twisted my wrist, and repeated my feeler gauge bits at the entire circumference, rotated 90° per time. Can't get the gauge between any of the faces... There are actually more than one Bruce (the other being someone I met in the Endeavour group many years ago, who splashed his 43 after 10 years ashore, recently) who've had no movement once back in the water for a time; I'm hopeful I'll have the same results, but am prepared to do battle with the system again as needed. L8R, y'all - pix to come. Skip I am assuming that you weren't trying to insert the feeler gage after you had tightened the bolts :-) |
#20
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Two steps forward, and one step - a huge one - back...
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:41:43 -0400, WaIIy wrote:
I think he put the feeler gauge in and then tightened the bolts. === As others have pointed out, that is not the right way to do it. Tightening the bolts on the coupling will correct minor misalignment by stressing the engine mounts but that is not what you want. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coakley steps in it again | General | |||
Superior Boats are Not Middle Steps | ASA | |||
Winterizing help needed, I/O Step by Step | General | |||
mast steps - fastep? | General | |||
Erie Canal Mast step/un-step | Cruising |