Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:25:34 -0600, CaveLamb
wrote: Jessica B wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:32:07 +0700, Bruce wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:45:51 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:07:49 +0700, Bruce wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:33:15 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:02:08 +0700, Bruce wrote: much snipped Sorry, but I didn't understand even 1/2 of this. Maybe one should not go sailing if you can't deal with the issues that come up, short of being run over by a tanker or something? Sounds pretty simple. Can you deal with a tsunami arrives with no warning and kills some 5,000 people in your immediate area? A 60 MPH squall that hits you at night? Of course not. A couple of things occur to me. First, I thought a tsunami was only dangerous near land. The wave front may only be a few inches (or feet) high depending on the depth of the water where you are. But they can move at amazingly high speeds. I've even heard near supersonic. So the amount of energy involved can be equally amazing. Enough to roll your boat. Or bust off the keel. From what I've read, nobody even knows a tsunami happens in the ocean. If that's the case, then how could it do damage to a boat that's sailing offshore? Second, it seems like you should be able to handle high winds. Wouldn't you be prepared for that? Why are you sleeping when there's a storm going on? Believe it or not, sailing can be very tiring. After a while the body is depleted and you just shut down. Ok, but wouldn't you have someone to take over while you sleep? If you get that tired, then maybe you need a shorter trip in better weather! Most of the boats abonded while racing are later found floating - intact. They were abandoned because the crew was exhausted to the point of having no other choice. No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? The crew is almost ALWAYS the limiting factor. I believe you. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If that's the case, then how could it do damage to a boat that's sailing offshore? Second, it seems like you should be able to handle high winds. Wouldn't you be prepared for that? Why are you sleeping when there's a storm going on? Believe it or not, sailing can be very tiring. After a while the body is depleted and you just shut down. Ok, but wouldn't you have someone to take over while you sleep? If you get that tired, then maybe you need a shorter trip in better weather! My boat sails 6 or 7 knots. Weather can move in many times faster than that. With modern weather forecasting we can pick our "window". But that's no guarantee that the weather guessers will be right The only perfectly safe way is to not go at all. And that's just not acceptable. The oldest prayer at sea still applies... Dear Lord, my boat is so small, and Your ocean so big... Most of the boats abandoned while racing are later found floating - intact. They were abandoned because the crew was exhausted to the point of having no other choice. No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? The crew is almost ALWAYS the limiting factor. I believe you. -- Richard Lamb email me: web site: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:49:45 -0600, CaveLamb
wrote: If that's the case, then how could it do damage to a boat that's sailing offshore? Second, it seems like you should be able to handle high winds. Wouldn't you be prepared for that? Why are you sleeping when there's a storm going on? Believe it or not, sailing can be very tiring. After a while the body is depleted and you just shut down. Ok, but wouldn't you have someone to take over while you sleep? If you get that tired, then maybe you need a shorter trip in better weather! My boat sails 6 or 7 knots. Weather can move in many times faster than that. With modern weather forecasting we can pick our "window". But that's no guarantee that the weather guessers will be right The only perfectly safe way is to not go at all. And that's just not acceptable. The oldest prayer at sea still applies... Dear Lord, my boat is so small, and Your ocean so big... Most of the boats abandoned while racing are later found floating - intact. They were abandoned because the crew was exhausted to the point of having no other choice. No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? The crew is almost ALWAYS the limiting factor. I believe you. Richard... but you and your boat should have a margin of ability several multiples of what "normal" wind would be wouldn't you? Does a squall last so long that you would give out after a few hours? If so, perhaps it's best not to go... as you said. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jessica B wrote:
No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? Try this on for size, and then Google for participants own reports: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Fastnet_race I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. Justin. -- Justin C, by the sea. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/28/2011 7:01 AM, Justin C wrote:
In , Jessica B wrote: No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? Try this on for size, and then Google for participants own reports:URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Fastnet_race I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. Justin. And just after that report came out, the price of a Contessa 32 doubled! G |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Gordon wrote:
On 1/28/2011 7:01 AM, Justin C wrote: Try this on for size, and then Google for participants own reports:URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Fastnet_race I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. Justin. And just after that report came out, the price of a Contessa 32 doubled! G I was going to comment on the Contessa myself, but I thought it might detract from my point. I've looked at a lot of boats (on-line) and I haven't found many with a stability curve that comes close to the Contessa. I'd love one, there's one in a slip just a long from me and she's in lovely condition, I admire it every time I pass. My wife wants a Rustler 36, we don't have the budget for either, but you'd get several Contessa's for the price of one Rustler :-( Justin. -- Justin C, by the sea. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:01:50 +0000, Justin C
wrote: In article , Jessica B wrote: No other choice than what? If the boat is still floating, why did the people leave? Try this on for size, and then Google for participants own reports: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Fastnet_race I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. Justin. From what I read, most of the deaths happened due to abandoning the boats. Maybe if they had stayed with the boat.... ? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats
in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. * Justin. From what I read, most of the deaths happened due to abandoning the boats. Maybe if they had stayed with the boat.... ? Fastnet Disaster of 1979 Interview with Bill Burrows, Chief Engineer Royal Navy Lifeboat Institution. Retrieved three disabled sailboats in a 21 hour rescue during the fatal 1979 Fastnet Storm. “… Look, you get 300 Yachats in poor weather and you’re going to have some trouble, almost certainly. But the majority of the trouble was hysteria created by the situation and by inexperienced crews. And that it was. They were blaming rudders and such, but none of those rudders would have snapped if they had put drogues out and storm jibs and run before the weather. They were under bare poles, most of them, and they were getting up on the seas. And the seas were about 45 feet. Not what we around here call big. They got up on these seas and they were running. When the boats were starting to broach, what the helmsmen were doing was hauling on the rudders to stop them from broaching. They were putting too much bloody strain on the rudders, and they had to go. Yes, I know they were racing sailors, not cruising men, but that’s no excuse. We went out that night and we passed a little old hooker sort of thing with a family of kids aboard and they were going away to Ireland with no trouble at all….” (The Yacht, April 1987) What was the most successful design in the history of Sydney to Hobart? Bob |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:01:23 -0800 (PST), Bob
wrote: I don't believe the people in this race were not prepared, nor the boats in poor condition. The crews were just exhausted, and in fear for their lives. Further reading: Sydney to Hobart, 1998. * Justin. From what I read, most of the deaths happened due to abandoning the boats. Maybe if they had stayed with the boat.... ? Fastnet Disaster of 1979 Interview with Bill Burrows, Chief Engineer Royal Navy Lifeboat Institution. Retrieved three disabled sailboats in a 21 hour rescue during the fatal 1979 Fastnet Storm. “… Look, you get 300 Yachats in poor weather and you’re going to have some trouble, almost certainly. But the majority of the trouble was hysteria created by the situation and by inexperienced crews. And that it was. They were blaming rudders and such, but none of those rudders would have snapped if they had put drogues out and storm jibs and run before the weather. They were under bare poles, most of them, and they were getting up on the seas. And the seas were about 45 feet. Not what we around here call big. They got up on these seas and they were running. When the boats were starting to broach, what the helmsmen were doing was hauling on the rudders to stop them from broaching. They were putting too much bloody strain on the rudders, and they had to go. Yes, I know they were racing sailors, not cruising men, but that’s no excuse. We went out that night and we passed a little old hooker sort of thing with a family of kids aboard and they were going away to Ireland with no trouble at all….” (The Yacht, April 1987) What was the most successful design in the history of Sydney to Hobart? Bob Hi Bob... well, I don't know... |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Bob... well, I don't know... Halvorson design: Freya 39 |